Mechanical vibrations are serious problems threatening key electronics and components of aerial vehicles under mission. For controlling the vibrations, fibre reinforced polymer composites are promising materials that can provide high damping as well as high strength values depending on their fibre orientations and stack sequences. In this study, Single Lap Joints (SLJs) with glass fibre reinforced adherends were subjected to two different tests; first non-destructive vibrations to measure their damping values, and then quasi-static loadings to assess their structural performance. The objective was to design joints with high damping and high strength. For this purpose, the adherends with different fibre orientations and stacking sequencies were manufactured and bonded using a constant adhesive layer of 0.2 mm and an overlap length of 25 mm. It is found the plies with ±45° fibre orientations that normally has a high energy absorption capability can contribute to the joint damping considerably depending on their stacking sequencies. The results show it is possible to get high values of damping as well as high the joint strength when using suitable parameters. For instance, Type3 joints achieved a 61% increase in damping with only a 14% reduction in strength compared to Type1. The joints were also analysed using finite element simulations that are consistent with experimental results.
XieDWuZHaiJ, et al.Reliability enhancement of automotive electronic modules using various glues. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), San Diego, CA, USA, 29 May–1 June 2018, 1–7.
2.
SuhirEGhaffarianR. Flip-chip (FC) and fine-pitch-ball-grid-array (FPBGA) underfills for application in aerospace electronics—Brief review. Aerospace2018; 5: 74.
3.
GrieuMMassiotGMaireO, et al.Durability modelling of a BGA component under random vibration. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multiphysics Simulation and Experiments in Micro-Electronics and Micro-Systems (EuroSimE), Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, 20–23 April 2008, 1–8.
4.
LallPPanduranganARRDornalaK, et al.Effect of shock angle on solder-joint reliability of potted assemblies under high-G shock. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm), Orlando, FL, USA, 21–23 July 2020, 1–12.
5.
XiaoWYuSLiuL, et al.Vibration reduction design of extension housing for printed circuit board based on particle damping materials. Appl Acoust2020; 168: 107434.
6.
Tae-YongPSeok-JinSHyun-UngO. New version of high-damping pcb with multi-layered viscous lamina. Aerospace2021; 8(202): 1–14.
7.
ParkTYShinSJParkSW, et al.High-damping PCB implemented by multi-layered viscoelastic acrylic tapes for use of wedge lock applications. Eng Fract Mech2021; 241: 107370.
8.
RueppelMRionJDransfeldC, et al.Damping of carbon fibre and flax fibre angle-ply composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol2017; 146: 1–9.
9.
RueppelMRionJDransfeldC, et al.Damping of carbon fibre and flax fibre reinforced angle ply polymers. In: ECCM17- 17th European Conference on Composite Materials, Munich, Germany, 2016.
10.
HungPYLauKTChengLK, et al.Impact response of hybrid carbon/glass fibre reinforced polymer composites designed for engineering applications. Compos B Eng2018; 133: 86–90.
11.
RozyloPDebskiHKubiakT. A model of low-velocity impact damage of composite plates subjected to compression-after-impact (CAI) testing. Compos Struct2017; 181: 158–170.
12.
ChandraRSinghSPGuptaK. A study of damping in fiber-reinforced composites. J Sound Vib2003; 262: 475–496.
13.
LiYCaiSHuangX. Multi-scaled enhancement of damping property for carbon fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2017; 146: 1–9.
14.
EliasALaurinFKaminskiM, et al.Experimental and numerical investigations of low energy/velocity impact damage generated in 3D woven composite with polymer matrix. Compos Struct2017; 159: 228–239.
15.
GiannopoulosIKDoroni-DawesDKourousisKI, et al.Effects of bolt torque tightening on the strength and fatigue life of airframe FRP laminate bolted joints. Compos B Eng2017; 125: 19–26.
16.
YooSYKimCHKweonJH, et al.The structural analysis and strength evaluation of the rivet nut joint for composite repair. Compos Struct2016; 136: 662–668.
KadiogluFAvilEErcanME, et al.Effects of different overlap lengths and composite adherend thicknesses on the performance of adhesively-bonded joints under tensile and bending loadings. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2018; 369(1): 012034.
19.
KadiogluFDemiralM. Failure behaviour of the single lap joints of angle-plied composites under three point bending tests. J Adhes Sci Technol2020; 34(5): 531–548.
20.
DemiralMKadiogluF. Failure behaviour of the adhesive layer and angle ply composite adherends in single lap joints: a numerical study. Int J Adhesion Adhes2018; 87: 181–190.
21.
MahiBEBenrahouKHBelakhdarK, et al.Effect of the tapered end of a FRP plate on the interfacial stresses in a strengthened beam used in civil engineering applications. Mech Compos Mater2014; 50: 467–476.
22.
LiJYanYZhangT, et al.Experimental study of adhesively bonded CFRP joints subjected to tensile loads. Int J Adhesion Adhes2015; 57: 95–104.
23.
CampilhoRDSGde MouraMFSFDominguesJJMS. Numerical prediction on the tensile residual strength of repaired CFRP under different geometric changes. Int J Adhesion Adhes2009; 29: 195–205.
24.
MarquesEASCampilhoRDSGda SilvaLFM. Geometrical study of mixed adhesive joints for high temperature applications. J Adhes Sci Technol2016; 30: 691–707.
25.
KarachaliosEFAdamsRDda SilvaLF. Single lap joints loaded in tension with high strength steel adherends. Int J Adhesion Adhes2013; 43: 81–95.
26.
KarachaliosEFAdamsRDda SilvaLF. Single lap joints loaded in tension with ductile steel adherends. Int J Adhesion Adhes2013; 43: 96–108.
27.
KadiogluFAdamsRD. Non-linear analysis of a ductile adhesive in the single lap joint under tensile loading. J Reinforc Plast Compos2009; 28(23): 2831–2838.
28.
BudheSBaneaMDde BarrosS, et al.An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int J Adhesion Adhes2017; 72: 30–42.
29.
SuianWYuanchenLZonghongX. Free vibration analysis of adhesively bonded lap joints through layerwise finite element. Compos Struct2019; 223: 110943.
30.
RaoMDCrockerMJ. Analytical and experimental study of the vibration of bonded beams with a lap joint. J Vib Acoust1990; 112(4): 444–451.
31.
HeSRaoMD. Vibration analysis of adhesively bonded lap joint, part I: theory. J Sound Vib1992; 152(3): 405–416.
32.
RaoMDHeS. Vibration analysis of adhesively bonded lap joint, Part II: numerical solution. J Sound Vib1992; 152(3): 417–425.
33.
SaitoHTaniH. Vibrations of bonded beams with a single-lap adhesive joint. J Sound Vib1984; 92: 299–309.
34.
AlmitaniKHOthmanR. Analytical solution of the harmonic response of visco elastic adhesively bonded single-lap and double-lap joints. Int J Adhesion Adhes2016; 71: 55–65.
35.
ChallitaG. Analytical study of the dynamic behavior of a voided adhesively bonded lap joint under axial harmonic load. Int J Solids Struct2018; 141–142: 183–194.
36.
RueppelMRionJDransfeldC, et al.Damping of carbon fibre and flax fibre reinforced angle ply polymers. In: ECCM17- 17th European Conference on Composite Materials, Germany, 2016.
37.
JenMHRKauYSOngCL. Effect of matrix resin on the response in a centrally notched composite laminate. Compos Struct1994; 29: 99–106.
38.
AdamsRDBaconDGC. Effect of fibre orientation and laminate geometry on the dynamic properties of CFRP. J Compos Mater1973; 7: 402–428.
39.
NiRGAdamsRD. The damping and dynamic moduli of symmetric laminated composite beams: theoretical and experimental results. J Compos Mater1984; 18: 104–121.
HadiASAshtonJN. Measurement and theoretical modelling of the damping properties of a uni-directional glass/epoxy composite. Compos Struct1996; 34: 381–385.
42.
KadiogluFSekerciHUCoskunT. A novel method to measure dynamic properties of composite materials. In: AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, (AIAA 2018- 0226), Florida, USA, 8–12 January, 2018.
43.
KadiogluFCoskunTElfarraM. Investigation of dynamic properties of a polymer matrix composite with different angles of fiber orientations. Mater Sci Eng2018; 369: 012037.
44.
KadiogluFCoskunT. Performance of fibre-reinforced polymer composite with ply-angle orientations for structural and vibratory applications. Int J Ast Aeron Eng2020; 5: 1–12.
45.
GuildFJAdamsRD. A new technique for the measurement of the specific damping capacity of beams in flexure. J Phys E1981; 14: 355–363.
46.
ShishesazMRezaADanialiM. Stress distribution in single lap joints with a cracked composite adherend—Part I: single lamina adherends. J Adhes2014; 90: 912–931.
47.
ShishesazMRezaADanialiM. Stress distribution in single lap joints with a cracked composite adherend—Part II: laminated adherends. J Adhes2014; 90: 933–954.
48.
SiddiqueAIqbalZNawabY, et al.A review of joining techniques for thermoplastic composite materials. J Thermoplast Compos2023; 36(8): 3417–3454.
49.
ASTM D1002. Annual book of standards, part 22 adhesives.
50.
GraessnerEJWongCR. M3D: mechanics and mechanisms of material damping. ASTM STP1992; 1169: 316–343.
51.
AdamsRDPeppiattNA. Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints. J Strain Anal Eng Des1974; 9(3): 185–196.
52.
TsaiMYMortonJ. The effect of a spew fillet on adhesive stress distributions in laminated composite single-lap joints. Compos Struct1995; 32(1): 123–131.
53.
LiechtiKMKadiogluF. Bending of fusion-bonded thermoplastic single lap joints. Eng Fail Anal2024; 165: 108829.
