This research focuses on the fabrication and characterization of jute fabric-reinforced polyester composites, exploring the effects of alkali treatment on their mechanical and structural properties. Jute fabrics were chemically treated with a 5% NaOH solution for varying exposure times, including raw, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours. The composites were manufactured using a vacuum contact molding process. Physical characterization methods included determining the reinforcement volume ratio and measuring the composites density. Tensile tests were conducted to assess the mechanical behavior of the materials under stress, providing critical insights into their performance. Structural characterization was performed using advanced techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray tomography, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyze the material’s internal structure and composition. Alkali treatment influenced the mechanical properties of the resulting composites. Notably, composites treated for 1 and 3 hours. XRD analysis revealed a modification in crystallinity parameters of the jute fibers after alkali treatment. FTIR spectra showed changes in chemical groups after treatment. X-ray tomography provided non-destructive, 3D analysis of the porosity within the composites, offering detailed information about pore size, shape, and distribution. The treated composites exhibited decreased porosity values, further validating the benefits of alkali treatment in reducing voids and improving material density. SEM observations revealed improved interfacial bonding between the jute fibers and the polyester matrix in the treated composites. The analysis of fracture surfaces elucidated fracture mechanisms, highlighting the critical role of interfacial bonding in determining the overall properties and performance of the composites.
ReponRMotalebKZMAIslamMT, et al.Tensile and water absorption properties of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite. Int J Compos Mater2017; 7(2): 72–76.
2.
CélinoAFréourSJacqueminF, et al.The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. Front Chem2014; 1: 43.
3.
CruzJRanaSFangueiroR (2013). Surface modification of natural fibers for application in composite materials: a review.
4.
KabirMMWangHLauKT, et al.Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Compos B Eng2012; 43(7): 2883–2892.
5.
FarukOBledzkiAKFinkHP, et al.Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci2012; 37(11): 1552–1596.
6.
KhanFHossainNHasanF, et al.Advances of natural fiber composites in diverse engineering applications—A review. Applications in Engineering Science2024; 18: 100184.
7.
Vazquez-NunezEAvecilla-RamirezAMVergara-PorrasB, et al.Green composites and their contribution toward sustainability: a review. Polym Polym Compos2021; 29(9_suppl): S1588–S1608.
8.
GeorgeJSreekalaMSThomasS. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci2001; 41(9): 1471–1485.
9.
ZwawiM. A review on natural fiber bio-composites, surface modifications and applications. Molecules2021; 26(2): 404.
10.
BenhamadoucheLRokbiMOsmaniH, et al.Characterization of physical and mechanical properties of recycled jute fabric reinforced polypropylene composites. Polym Compos2021; 42(10): 5435–5444.
11.
RamnathBVElanchezhianCNirmalPV, et al.Experimental investigation of mechanical behavior of jute-flax based glass fiber reinforced composite. Fibers Polym2014; 15(6): 1251–1262.
12.
TeraubeOAgopianJCPetitE, et al.Surface modification of sized vegetal fibers through direct fluorination for eco-composites. J Fluor Chem2020; 238: 109618.
13.
SuddellBC. Industrial fibres: recent and current developments. In: Proceedings of the symposium on natural fibres. Rome: FAO and CFC, 2008, 71–82.
14.
De CarvalhoLHDe SouzaGCd'AlmeidaJRM. Hybrid jute/cotton fabric–polyester composites: effect of fabric architecture, lamina stacking sequence and weight fraction of jute fibres on tensile strength. Plast Rubber Compos2007; 36(4): 155–161.
15.
VilayVMariattiMMat TaibR, et al.Effect of fiber surface treatment and fiber loading on the properties of bagasse fiber–reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(3-4): 631–638.
16.
LatifRWakeelSZaman KhanN, et al.Surface treatments of plant fibers and their effects on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Reinforc Plast Compos2019; 38(1): 15–30.
17.
ZhouFChengGJiangB. Effect of silane treatment on microstructure of sisal fibers. Appl Surf Sci2014; 292: 806–812.
18.
BledzkiAKGassanJ. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci1999; 24: 221–274. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5.
19.
Herlina SariNWardanaINGSurya IrawanY, et al.The effect of sodium hydroxide on chemical and mechanical properties of corn husk fiber. Orient J Chem2017; 33(6): 3037–3042.
20.
LakshmananAGhoshRKDasguptaS, et al.Optimization of alkali treatment condition on jute fabric for the development of rigid biocomposite. J Ind Textil2018; 47(5): 640–655.
21.
FangXTaoXXieY, et al.The effect of alkali treatment on the mechanical strength, thermal stability, and water absorption of bamboo Fiber/PLA composites. Forests2025; 16(1): 123.
22.
SinghJIPSinghSDhawanV. Effect of alkali treatment on mechanical properties of jute fiber-reinforced partially biodegradable green composites using epoxy resin matrix. Polym Polym Compos2020; 28(6): 388–397.
23.
Kumar KrovvidiSCSPGoyalSBhaduriAK. Design, analysis and experimental validation of Inconel-625 bellows for critical applications. Mater Today Proc2021; 39: 1733–1737.
24.
FloresALLKairytėAŠeputytė-JucikėJ, et al.Effect of chemical treatments on the mechanical properties of jute/polyester composites. Materials2024; 17(10): 2320.
25.
AnDZhaoDLiX, et al.Synthesis of surfactant-free hydroxypropylcellulose nanogel and its dual-responsive properties. Carbohydr Polym2015; 134: 385–389.
26.
BuffiereJYMaireEAdrienJ, et al.In situ experiments with X ray tomography: an attractive tool for experimental mechanics. Exp Mech2010; 50: 289–305.
27.
Munikenche GowdaTNaiduACBChhayaR. Some mechanical properties of untreated jute fabric-reinforced polyester composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf1999; 30(3): 277–284.
28.
XuRWuYF. Analytical study of beams strengthened by adhesively bonded reinforcement with variable properties using state space method. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(11-12): 1912–1918.
29.
KangSKLeeDBChoiNS. Fiber/Epoxy interfacial shear strength measured by the microdroplet test. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(2): 245–251.
30.
MohammedMRahmanRMohammedAM, et al.Surface treatment to improve water repellence and compatibility of natural fiber with polymer matrix: recent advancement. Polym Test2022; 115: 107707.
31.
CharletK. Fibers and of the derived unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater; 44(24): 2887–2896.
32.
WatanabeRIzakiKYamamotoK, et al.Preparation of nanochitin/polystyrene composite particles by pickering emulsion polymerization using scaled-down chitin nanofibers. Coatings2021; 11(6): 672.
33.
LiaoZHuYShenY, et al.Investigation into the reinforcement modification of natural plant fibers and the sustainable development of thermoplastic natural plant fiber composites. Polymers2024; 16(24): 3568.
34.
OwenMM. The effects of alkali treatment on the mechanical properties of jute fabric reinforced epoxy composites. International Journal of fiber and textile research2014; 4(2): 32–40.
35.
RayDSarkarBKRanaAK, et al.Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. Bull Mater Sci2001; 24: 129–135.
36.
BorchaniKECarrotCJaziriM. Untreated and alkali treated fibers from alfa stem: effect of alkali treatment on structural, morphological and thermal features. Cellulose2015; 22: 1577–1589.
37.
LiXTabilLGPanigrahiS. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ2007; 15: 25–33.
38.
ManimaranPSaravanakumarSSMithunNK, et al.Physicochemical properties of new cellulosic fibers from the bark of Acacia arabica. Int J Polym Anal Char2016; 21(6): 548–553.
39.
MwaikamboLYAnsellMP. Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 84(12): 2222–2234.
40.
KhanMAAliKMIBasuSC. IR studies of wood plastic composites. J Appl Polym Sci1993; 49(9): 1547–1551.
41.
SenthamaraikannanPKathiresanM. Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fiber from coccinia grandis. L. Carbohydr Polym2018; 186: 332–343.
42.
BabatundeOAUmoruPE. Determination of the physicochemical parameters, saturation and unsaturation of some branded and unbranded vegetable oils sold in sabo market, Kaduna state by fourier transformed infrared (ftir) analysis. Fudma Journal of Sciences2022; 6(5): 140–145.
43.
ShahinurSHasanMAhsanQ, et al.Effect of rot-fire-and water-retardant treatments on jute fiber and their associated thermoplastic composites: a study by FTIR. Polymers2021; 13(15): 2571.
44.
RanaMSRahimMAMosharrafMP, et al.Morphological, spectroscopic and thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from waste jute fiber by acid hydrolysis. Polymers2023; 15(6): 1530.
45.
LiJLuYYangD, et al.Lignocellulose aerogel from wood-ionic liquid solution (1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride) under freezing and thawing conditions. Biomacromolecules2011; 12(5): 1860–1867.
46.
Annie PaulSBoudenneAIbosL, et al.Effect of fiber loading and chemical treatments on thermophysical properties of banana fiber/polypropylene commingled composite materials. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39(9): 1582–1588.
47.
RanaAKBasakRKMitraBC, et al.Studies of acetylation of jute using simplified procedure and its characterization. J Appl Polym Sci1997; 64(8): 1517–1523.
48.
SunQJainMK. Computational elastic analysis of AA7075-O using 3D-microstructrure-based-RVE with really-distributed particles. Int J Mech Sci2022; 221: 107192.
49.
SudhaSThilagavathiG. Effect of alkali treatment on mechanical properties of woven jute composites. J Text Inst2016; 107(6): 691–701.
50.
VinodAVijayRLenin SingaraveluD, et al.Effect of alkali treatment on performance characterization of Ziziphus mauritiana fiber and its epoxy composites. J Ind Textil2022; 51(2_suppl): 2444S–2466S.
51.
AzzedineMELOUKIAzzedineBENYAHIANadirDEGHFEL, et al.Effect of alkaline treatment on mechanical properties of alfa fiber/unsaturated polyester composite. Cellul Chem Technol2023; 57(5-6): 607–615.
ElbadryEAAly-HassanMSHamadaH. Mechanical properties of natural jute fabric/jute mat fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites. Adv Mech Eng2012; 4: 354547.
54.
AchaBAMarcovichNEReboredoMM. Physical and mechanical characterization of jute fabric composites. J Appl Polym Sci2005; 98(2): 639–650.
55.
AdekunleKF. Surface treatments of natural fibres—A review: part 1. OJPChem2015; 05(03): 41–46.
56.
Burrola-NúñezHHerrera-FrancoPJRodríguez-FélixDE, et al.Surface modification and performance of jute fibers as reinforcement on polymer matrix: an overview. J Nat Fibers2019; 16: 944–960.
57.
SivakandhanCMuraliGTamiloliN, et al.Studies on mechanical properties of sisal and jute fiber hybrid sandwich composite. Mater Today Proc2020; 21: 404–407.
58.
SahuPGuptaMK. A review on the properties of natural fibres and its bio-composites: effect of alkali treatment. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L2020; 234(1): 198–217.
59.
SahaAMarazKMKhanRA. Physio-mechanical properties and applications of natural fiber reinforced bio-composites. GSC Adv Eng Technol2022; 3(1): 001–010.
