The growing demand to use thermoplastic matrix composites in aeronautic has been confronted with the need to understand the fracture mechanisms under different service conditions. Thus, the present work aims at studying the influence of different thermal stress conditions on the fracture behavior of PolyEther Ether Ketone-reinforced carbon/glass fiber hybrid laminates (CG/PEEK), as a function of heating temperature and fire exposure time. Compact Tensile (CT) specimens are exposed to isothermal (from 350°C to 550°C in a high temperature furnace) and critical service conditions (kerosene flame exposure characterized by a heat flux of 116 kW/m2 and a temperature of 1150°C) exposure conditions. Monotonic tensile tests are then conducted to assess the mode I translaminar fracture toughness (FT) at room temperature. Crack propagation is monitored during mechanical loading using a Digital Image Correlation (DIC) device combined with a binarization algorithm. Then, the G-R curves have been obtained from the compliance method. Under isothermal conditions, the residual mechanical properties degrade as temperature increases, particularly once thermal decomposition is about to start, due to the formation of porosities and extensive delamination. Under flame exposure, the microscopic and tomographic observations reveal thermally- and mechanically-induced damages with a heterogeneous distribution due to temperature gradients within the plies of laminates. Depending on the pyrolysis degree of each ply, the load bearing capabilities of the plies gradually deteriorate from the exposed to the opposed side. The critical FT values shows a decreasing trend (as a function of fire exposure time) with increasing ply number of charred regions through the thickness.
ZimmermannNWangPH. A review of failure modes and fracture analysis of aircraft composite materials. Eng Fail Anal2020; 115: 104692. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104692.
2.
MouritzAP. Fire safety of advanced composites for aircraft. Canberra City: RMIT University, 2006.
3.
BouvetC. Mechanics of aeronautical composite materials. London, Hoboken: ISTE Ltd; John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017.
4.
MouritzAPGibsonAG. Fire properties of polymer composite materials. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
5.
VieilleBAucherJTalebL. Comparative study on the behavior of woven-ply reinforced thermoplastic or thermosetting laminates under severe environmental conditions. Mater Des2012; 35: 707–719. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.037.
6.
SchuhlerECoppalleAVieilleB, et al.Behaviour of aeronautical polymer composite to flame: a comparative study of thermoset- and thermoplastic-based laminate. Polym Degrad Stabil2018; 152: 105–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.004.
7.
VieilleBCoppalleALe PluartL, et al.Kerosene flame behaviour of C/PEKK composite laminates: influence of exposure time and laminates lay-up on residual mechanical properties. Compos B Eng2021; 222: 109046. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109046.
8.
MaaroufiMACarpierYVieilleB, et al.Post-fire compressive behaviour of carbon fibers woven-ply polyphenylene sulfide laminates for aeronautical applications. Compos B Eng2017; 119: 101–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.046.
9.
VieilleBLefebvreCCoppalleA. Post fire behavior of carbon fibers polyphenylene sulfide- and epoxy-based laminates for aeronautical applications: a comparative study. Mater Des2014; 63: 56–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.046.
10.
BouvetCVieilleB. Mécanique de la rupture de fibres dans les composites stratifiés. Systèmes aéronautiques et spatiaux2020. DOI: 10.51257/a-v1-trp4044.
11.
KawAK. Mechanics of composite materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Taylor & Francis, 2006, vol 2.
12.
MonticeliFMFugaFRDonadonMV. A systematic review on translaminar fracture damage propagation in fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 187: 110742. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110742.
LaffanMJPinhoSTRobinsonP, et al.Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part I: data reduction. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 606–613. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.016.
15.
LaffanMJPinhoSTRobinsonP, et al.Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part II: size and lay-up effects. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 614–621. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.011.
IrwinGDe WitR. A summary of fracture mechanics concepts. J Test Eval1983; 11: 56–65. DOI: 10.1520/JTE11586J.
18.
LauneyMERitchieRO. On the fracture toughness of advanced materials. Adv Mater2009; 21: 2103–2110. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803322.
19.
HouFHongS. Characterization of R-curve behavior of translaminar crack growth in cross-ply composite laminates using digital image correlation. Eng Fract Mech2014; 117: 51–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.010.
20.
XuXTakedaSWisnomMR. Investigation of fracture process zone development in quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates using in situ and ex situ X-ray computed tomography. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2023; 166: 107395. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107395.
21.
ReinerJChenCVaziriR, et al.Combining digital image correlation and phased-array ultrasonics for non-destructive testing of translaminar fracture in composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 161: 107060. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107060.
22.
LaffanMJPinhoSTRobinsonP, et al.Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: a review. Polym Test2012; 31: 481–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002.
23.
E08 Committee. Test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials2023. DOI: 10.1520/E0399-22.
24.
E08 Committee. Test method for measurement of fracture toughness2019. DOI: 10.1520/E1820-18.
25.
D30 Committee. Test method for translaminar fracture toughness of laminated and pultruded polymer matrix composite materials2015. DOI: 10.1520/E1922-04R15.
26.
ChabchoubMBouscarratDVieilleB, et al.Investigations on the mode I translaminar failure and determination of fracture toughness in woven-ply carbon fibers thermoplastic composites at high temperatures. Appl Acoust2017; 128: 55–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.028.
27.
Pujols GonzalezJDVieilleBBouvetC. High temperature translaminar fracture of woven-ply thermoplastic laminates in tension and in compression. Eng Fract Mech2021; 246: 107616. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107616.
28.
LisleTBouvetCHongkarnjanakulN, et al.Measure of fracture toughness of compressive fiber failure in composite structures using infrared thermography. Compos Sci Technol2015; 112: 22–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.005.
29.
PinhoSTRobinsonPIannucciL. Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 2069–2079. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023.
30.
CatalanottiGCamanhoPPXavierJ, et al.Measurement of resistance curves in the longitudinal failure of composites using digital image correlation. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 1986–1993. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.022.
31.
RutarRSerraJBausiereQ, et al.Experimental characterization of tensile and compressive translaminar fracture toughness coupling multi-physics measurements. Eng Fract Mech2023; 291: 109568. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109568.
32.
LisleTPastorM-LBouvetC, et al.Damage of woven composite under translaminar cracking tests using infrared thermography. Compos Struct2017; 161: 275–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.030.
33.
E08 Committee. Test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIc of metallic materials1997. DOI: 10.1520/E0399-90R97.
34.
VieilleBGonzalezJ-DBouvetC. Fracture mechanics of hybrid composites with ductile matrix and brittle fibers: influence of temperature and constraint effect. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 1361–1376. DOI: 10.1177/0021998318802613.
35.
OrtegaAMaimíPGonzálezEV, et al.Translaminar fracture toughness of interply hybrid laminates under tensile and compressive loads. Compos Sci Technol2017; 143: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.029.
36.
FurtadoCArteiroALindeP, et al.Is there a ply thickness effect on the mode I intralaminar fracture toughness of composite laminates?Theor Appl Fract Mech2020; 107: 102473. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102473.
37.
KhanR. Fiber bridging in composite laminates: a literature review. Compos Struct2019; 229: 111418. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111418.
38.
CarpierYVieilleBCoppalleA, et al.About the tensile mechanical behaviour of carbon fibers fabrics reinforced thermoplastic composites under very high temperature conditions. Compos B Eng2020; 181: 107586. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107586.
39.
VieilleBAliaACoppalleA, et al.In situ tensile behavior of hybrid carbon and glass fibers reinforced PEEK laminates: isothermal or fire testing conditions. Compos B Eng2023; 262: 110807. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110807.
40.
MunroMLaiCPZ. The elevated-temperature dependence of fracture energy mechanisms of hybrid carbon-glass fibre reinforced composites. J Mater Sci1988; 23: 3129–3136. DOI: 10.1007/BF00551284.
41.
KimK-YYeLPhoaK-M. Interlaminar fracture toughness of CF/PEI and GF/PEI composites at elevated temperatures. Appl Compos Mater2004; 11: 173–190. DOI: 10.1023/B:ACMA.0000026586.12629.7e.
42.
PatelPHullTRLyonRE, et al.Investigation of the thermal decomposition and flammability of PEEK and its carbon and glass-fibre composites. Polym Degrad Stabil2011; 96: 12–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.11.009.
43.
PatelPHullTRMcCabeRW, et al.Mechanism of thermal decomposition of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) from a review of decomposition studies. Polym Degrad Stabil2010; 95: 709–718. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.024.
44.
LinLVieilleBBouvetC. About the influence of a thermal aggression on the tensile behaviour of hybrid PEEK thermoplastic laminates. Compos Struct2024; 333: 117945. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117945.
45.
CarpierYVieilleBDelpouveN, et al.Isothermal and anisothermal decomposition of carbon fibres polyphenylene sulfide composites for fire behavior analysis. Fire Saf J2019; 109: 102868. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102868.
46.
TadiniPGrangeNChetehounaK, et al.Thermal degradation analysis of innovative PEKK-based carbon composites for high-temperature aeronautical components. Aero Sci Technol2017; 65: 106–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.02.011.
47.
SwannJDDingYStoliarovSI. Comparative analysis of pyrolysis and combustion of bisphenol A polycarbonate and poly(ether ether ketone) using two-dimensional modeling: a relation between thermal transport and the physical structure of the intumescent char. Combust Flame2020; 212: 469–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.11.017.
48.
VieilleBCoppalleAKellerC, et al.Correlation between post fire behavior and microstructure degradation of aeronautical polymer composites. Mater Des2015; 74: 76–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.002.
49.
BazliMAbolfazliM. Mechanical properties of fibre reinforced polymers under elevated temperatures: an overview. Polymers2020; 12: 2600. DOI: 10.3390/polym12112600.
50.
DoddsNGibsonAGDewhurstD, et al.Fire behaviour of composite laminates. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2000; 31: 689–702. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00015-4.
51.
FeihSMouritzAP. Tensile properties of carbon fibres and carbon fibre–polymer composites in fire. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43: 765–772. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.016.
52.
WolfrumJWhitneyEEiblS. Approaches to understand and predict the influence of rapid heat-up on degradation and strength of carbon fibre polymer matrix composites. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 2435–2447. DOI: 10.1177/0021998316671184.
53.
GardinerCPMathysZMouritzAP. Tensile and Compressive Properties of FRP Composites with Localised Fire Damage. Applied Composite Materials2002; 9: 353–367.
54.
VieilleBCoppalleASchuhlerEChaudharyAAliaADelpouveN. Influence of kerosene flame on fire-behaviour and mechanical properties of hybrid Carbon Glass fibers reinforced PEEK composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2022; 279: 114786. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114786.
55.
SchuhlerEChaudharyAVieilleBCoppalleA. Fire behaviour of composite materials using kerosene burner tests at small-scales. Fire Saf J2021; 121: 103290. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103290.
