A novel family of composite laminates with a simplified stacking sequence and double-double layup [±ϕ/±ψ]n has significant potential to reduce weight and increase strength, while facilitating design optimization and simplifying the manufacturing process. In this study, the low-velocity impact response of a double-double (DD) laminate and a quadriaxial (Quad) laminate of equivalent stiffness and thickness were compared. Carbon/epoxy laminates were produced with stacking sequences of [±0/±50]10 and [03/90/±45/02/±45]2S corresponding to double-double and quadriaxial varieties, respectively. Low velocity impact tests were conducted at 74 J of energy and damage areas were examined using X-ray computed tomography. Compressive strength and compression after impact (CAI) strength were equivalent for the two laminates. However, differences in impact damage morphology were observed and are discussed.
BohrerRZGKimIY. Concurrent topology and stacking sequence optimization of composite laminate plates using lamination parameters. Compos Struct2021; 276(July): 114556. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114556.
2.
Von HagelKJoglekarSPankowM, et al.Exploring composite panels using multi-objective optimization and varying load conditions. In: AIAA Aviat 2014-15th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, 16-20 June 2014, 1–17.
3.
IrisarriFXBassirDHCarrereN, et al.Multiobjective stacking sequence optimization for laminated composite structures. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(7–8): 983–990.
4.
LeeCGreenhalghESPanesarA. Optimization of patch-wise laminated composite panels for enhanced dynamic characteristics. Compos Struct2021; 269(April): 114017. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114017.
5.
SprengholzMTraubHSinapiusM, et al.Rapid transformation of lamination parameters into stacking sequences. Compos Struct2021; 276(August): 114514.
6.
VermesBTsaiSWMassardT, et al.Design of laminates by a novel “double–double” layup. Thin-Wall Struct2021;165(May):107954. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107954.
7.
TsaiSWMeloJDDSihnS, et al.Composite laminates: theory and practice of analysis, design and automated layup. Stanford, California: Stanford Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017.
8.
TsaiSW. Double–double: new family of composite laminates. AIAA J2021; 59(11): 4293–4305.
9.
VermesBTsaiSWRiccioA, et al.Application of the Tsai’s modulus and double-double concepts to the definition of a new affordable design approach for composite laminates. Compos Struct2021; 259: 113246. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113246.
10.
VijayachandranAWaasA. On the use of non traditional stacking to maximize critical buckling loads in flat composite panels. Compos Struct2021; 261(August): 113320. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113320.
11.
ShrivastavaSSharmaNTsaiSW, et al.D and DD-drop layup optimization of aircraft wing panels under multi-load case design environment. Compos Struct2020; 248(January): 112518. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112518.
12.
ArteiroASharmaNMeloJDD, et al.A case for Tsai’s modulus, an invariant-based approach to stiffness. Compos Struct2020; 252(June): 112683. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112683.
13.
TsaiSWSharmaNArteiroA, et al.Composite double-double and grid/skin structures - low weight/low cost design and manufacturing1st ed.Stanford Univerity. International Paris air Show. 2019: 129.
14.
KazemianfarBEsmaeeliMNamiMR. Response of 3D woven composites under low velocity impact with different impactor geometries. Aerosp Sci Technol2020; 102: 105849.
15.
SantosJKDdosDantas da CunhaRde Amorim JuniorWF, et al.The variation in low speed impact strength on glass fiber/Kevlar composite hybrids. J Compos Mater2020; 54(21): 3009–3019.
16.
da CunhaRADda CunhaRDde Amorim JuniorWF, et al.Study of an intraply/yarn composite submitted to low-velocity impact in the presence of high void content. J Mater Eng Perform2021; 30(10): 7523–7531.
17.
da CunhaRDda CunhaRADde Amorim JuniorWF, et al.Study of the resistance variation in intraply/yarn Kevlar/glass composite after low-velocity impact. J Mater Eng Perform2020; 29(8): 5001–5007.
18.
NettlesATJacksonJRHodgeAJ. Change in damage tolerance characteristics of sandwich structure with a thermal protection system (TPS). J Compos Mater2012; 46(2): 211–226.
NettlesATGuinWEJacksonJR. Repair of thin face sheet sandwich structure with small holes and impact damage. Appl Compos Mater2020; 27(3): 231–250.
21.
de AzevedoCMDda CunhaRDFreire JuniorRCS, et al.Development of a mathematical model to analyze residual strength of composites after low-velocity impact. J Strain Anal Eng Des2018; 53(8): 738–745.
22.
XiaoLWangGQiuS, et al.Exploration of energy absorption and viscoelastic behavior of CFRPs subjected to low velocity impact. Compos. B: Eng2019; 165: 247–254.
23.
ChengZXiongJ. Progressive damage behaviors of woven composite laminates subjected to LVI, TAI and CAI. Chinese J. Aeronaut2020; 33(10): 2807–2823.
24.
YinHIannucciL. An experimental and finite element investigation of compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of biaxial carbon fibre non-crimp-fabric (NCF) based composites. Compos Struct2022; 281(December 2021): 115057. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115057.
25.
NettlesATJacksonJR. Compression after impact strength of out-of-autoclave processed laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos2013; 32(24): 1887–1894.
D7136/D7136M. A. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. Annu B ASTM Stand2012; i(C): 1–16.
33.
ASTM Standard. D7137/D7137M − 17 standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite plates. ASTM Int2012; i: 1–16.
34.
CantwellWJ. The influence of target geometry on the high velocity impact response of CFRP. Compos Struct1988; 10(3): 247–265.
35.
JoshiSPSunCT. Impact induced fracture in a laminated composite. J Compos Mater1985; 19(1): 51–66.
36.
SalpekarSA. Analysis of delamination in cross ply laminates initiating from impact induced matrix cracking. J. Compos. Technol. Res1993; 15(2): 88–94.
37.
SrinivasanKJacksonWCSmithBT, et al.Characterization of damage modes in impacted thermoset and thermoplastic composites. J Reinf Plast Compos1992; 11(10): 1111–1126.
38.
SoutisCFleckNA. Static compression failure of carbon fibre T800/924C composite plate with a single hole. J Compos Mater1990; 24(5): 536–558.
39.
SoutisCCurtisPT. Prediction of the post-impact compressive strength of CFRP laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(6): 677–684.
40.
HawyesVJCurtisPTSoutisC. Effect of impact damage on the compressive response of composite laminates. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf2001; 32(9): 1263–1270.
41.
NettlesAHodgeAJacksonJ. An examination of the compressive cyclic loading aspects of damage tolerance for polymer matrix launch vehicle hardware. J Compos Mater2011; 45(4): 437–458.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
