For network architecture design, stress concentration sensitivity caused by particle shape may change, which is rarely studied. Here, the particle shape dependent stress concentration and its effect on the deformation, fracture, and mechanical properties were investigated. Three particle shapes including hexahedron, twenty-six face polyhedron, and sphere were utilized to generate different stress distribution states in the matrix. A numerical composite model showing network architecture (like grain boundary) was applied. A strong correlation between particle shape, stress concentration factor (RSiC), and mechanical properties of network composite was built. The particle shape affected the load-bearing capability due to the stress concentration state generated at particle edges. Near the yield point, hexahedron particle wall parallel to the load direction (PaW) was more effective in carrying loads (∼1000 MPa) than that of twenty-six face polyhedron (750–1000 MPa) and sphere (600–1000 MPa) particles. In network composites reinforced by different shape particles, the main crack always initiated in perpendicular network walls (PeW), but propagated along different paths: in Al matrix for hexahedron particle, along macro-interface of SiC/Al–Al for twenty-six face polyhedron particle, and in PeW for sphere particle. Such crack propagation manners contributed to the different elongations of network composites by various particle shapes: sphere > twenty-six face polyhedron > hexahedron particles. Selection of round particle and adjustment of local volume fraction improved elongation with a sacrifice of modulus and strength.
HuangLJGengLPengHX. Microstructurally inhomogeneous composites: is a homogeneous reinforcement distribution optimal?Prog Mater Sci2015; 71: 93–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.002.
2.
PatelVVEl-DesoukyAGarayJE, et al.Pressure-less and current-activated pressure-assisted sintering of titanium dual matrix composites: effect of reinforcement particle size. Mater Sci Eng A2009; 507(1–2): 161–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.046.
3.
SahaRMorrisEChawlaN, et al.Hybrid and conventional particle reinforced metal matrix composites by squeeze infiltration casting. J Mater Sci Lett2002; 21: 337–339. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017960912030.
4.
QinSYZhangGD. Preparation of high fracture performance SiCp-6061Al/6061Al composite. Mater Sci Eng A2000; 279(1–2): 231–236. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00627-9.
5.
WongJCParamsothyMGuptaM. Using Mg and Mg–nanoAl2O3 concentric alternating macro-ring material design to enhance the properties of magnesium. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(3–4): 438–444. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.009.
6.
WuHLeiCXDuY, et al.Microstructure and superior mechanical property of in situ (TiBw + TiCp)/Ti composites with laminated structure. Ceram Int2021; 47(8): 11423–11431. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.269.
7.
PengHXFanZEvansJRG. Bi-continuous metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2001; 303(1–2): 37–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01879-7.
8.
SchermFVölklRvan SmaalenS, et al.Microstructural characterization of interpenetrating light weight metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2009; 518(1–2): 118–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.010.
ZhangXXuYWangM, et al.A powder-metallurgy-based strategy toward three-dimensional graphene-like network for reinforcing copper matrix composites. Nat Commun2020; 11: 2775. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16490-4.
11.
HuangLAnQGengL, et al.Multiscale architecture and superior high‐temperature performance of discontinuously reinforced titanium matrix composites. Adv Mater2021; 33(6): 2000688. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202000688.
12.
CaiCHeSLiL, et al.In-situ TiB/Ti-6Al-4V composites with a tailored architecture produced by hot isostatic pressing: microstructure evolution, enhanced tensile properties and strengthening mechanisms. Composites B Eng2019; 164: 546–558. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.080.
13.
LuK. The Future of Metals. Science2010; 328(5976): 319–320. DOI: 10.1126/science.1185866.
14.
YanYWGengLLiAB. Experimental and numerical studies of the effect of particle size on the deformation behavior of the metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2007; 448(1–2): 315–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.158.
15.
ShaoJCXiaoBLWangQZ, et al.An enhanced FEM model for particle size dependent flow strengthening and interface damage in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71(1): 39–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.014.
16.
ZhangJOuyangQBGuoQ, et al.3D Microstructure-based finite element modeling of deformation and fracture of SiCp/Al composites. Compos Sci Technol2016; 123: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.014.
17.
HuangTGongY. A multiscale analysis for predicting the elastic properties of 3D woven composites containing void defects. Compos Struct2018; 185: 401–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.046.
18.
LeiHFZhangZQLiuB. Effect of fiber arrangement on mechanical properties of short fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72(4): 506–514. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.12.011.
19.
ChengFKimS-MReddyJN, et al.Modeling of elastoplastic behavior of stainless-steel/bronze interpenetrating phase composites with damage evolution. Int J Plast2014; 61: 94–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.05.001.
20.
GuoRLiuR-ZJiangW, et al.Numerical analysis on static mechanical properties of the periodic multilayer lattice. Mater Eng2011; 3(12): 9208. DOI: 10.4236/eng.2011.312143.
21.
DengBXuRZhaoK, et al.Composite bending-dominated hollow nanolattices: a stiff, cyclable mechanical metamaterial. Mater Today2018; 21(5): 467–474. DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.027.
22.
DalaqASAbueiddaDWAbu Al-RubRK, et al.Finite element prediction of effective elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites with architectured 3D sheet reinforcements. Int J Solids Struct2016; 83: 169–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.011.
23.
AbueiddaDWDalaqASAbu Al-RubRK, et al.Micromechanical finite element predictions of a reduced coefficient of thermal expansion for 3D periodic architectured interpenetrating phase composites. Compos Struct2015; 133: 85–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.082.
24.
SoyarslanCBargmannSPradasM, et al.3D stochastic bicontinuous microstructures: generation, topology and elasticity. Acta Mater2018; 149: 326–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.005.
25.
LiGZhangXFanQ, et al.Simulation of damage and failure processes of interpenetrating SiC/Al composites subjected to dynamic compressive loading. Acta Mater2014; 78: 190–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.045.
26.
WangPNianGQuS, et al.Numerical study on mechanical properties of discontinuously reinforced titanium matrix composite with network reinforcement architecture. Int J Appl Mech2017; 09(5): 1750073. DOI: 10.1142/S1758825117500739.
27.
ZhaoSXuYPanC, et al.Microstructural modeling and strengthening mechanism of TiB/Ti-6Al-4V discontinuously-reinforced titanium matrix composite. Materials2019; 12(5): 827. DOI: 10.3390/ma12050827.
28.
LeeWJKimYJKangNH, et al.Finite-element modeling of the particle clustering effect in a powder-metallurgy-processed ceramic-particle-reinforced metal matrix composite on its mechanical properties. Mech Compos Mater2011; 46: 639–648. DOI: 10.1007/s11029-011-9177-y.
29.
HuangLJGengLXuHY, et al.Room temperature tensile fracture characteristics of in situ TiBw/Ti6Al4V composites with a quasi-continuous network architecture. Scr Mater2011; 64(9): 844–847. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.011.
30.
AbediniAButcherCChenZT. Numerical simulation of the influence of particle clustering on tensile behavior of particle-reinforced composites. Comput Mater Sci2013; 73: 15–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.02.021.
31.
GaoXZhangXGengL. Strengthening and fracture behaviors in SiCp/Al composites with network particle distribution architecture. Mater Sci Eng A2019; 740-741: 353–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.105.
32.
QinSChenCZhangG, et al.The effect of particle shape on ductility of SiCp reinforced 6061 Al matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A1999; 272(2): 363–370. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00503-1.
33.
GaoXZhangXLiA, et al.Plastic deformation and fracture behaviors in particle-reinforced aluminum composites: a numerical approach using an enhanced finite element model. J Compos Mater2020; 54(15): 1977–1985. DOI: 10.1177/0021998319889110.
34.
GöktürkHSFiskeTJKalyonDM. Effects of particle shape and size distributions on the electrical and magnetic properties of nickel/polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci1993; 50(11): 1891–1901. DOI: 10.1002/app.1993.070501105.
35.
SuYOuyangQZhangW, et al.Composite structure modeling and mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2014; 597: 359–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.024.
36.
WilliamsJJSeguradoJLLorcaJ, et al.Three dimensional (3D) microstructure-based modeling of interfacial decohesion in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A2012; 557: 113–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.108.
37.
RasoolABöhmHJ. Effects of particle shape on the macroscopic and microscopic linear behaviors of particle reinforced composites. Int J Eng Sci2012; 58: 21–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.03.022.
38.
LiuCZhangGDNakaM. Particle shape effects on ductility of SiC particle reinforced LD2 matrix composites investigated by AFM-based nanoindentation. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China2001; 11(4): 509–512, https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZYSY200104009.htm.
39.
BöhmHJRasoolA. Effects of particle shape on the thermoelastoplastic behavior of particle reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct2016; 87: 90–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.028.
40.
KaveendranBWangGSHuangLJ, et al.In situ (Al3Zr+Al2O3np)/2024Al metal matrix composite with novel reinforcement distributions fabricated by reaction hot pressing. J Alloys Compd2013; 581: 16–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.06.143.
41.
CappolaJStinvilleJ-CCharpagneM-A, et al.On the localization of plastic strain in microtextured regions of Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater2021; 204: 116492. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116492.
42.
GanesanSYaghoobiMGithensA, et al.The effects of heat treatment on the response of WE43 Mg alloy: crystal plasticity finite element simulation and SEM-DIC experiment. Int J Plast2021; 137: 102917. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102917.
43.
QueyRDawsonPRBarbeF. Large-scale 3D random polycrystals for the fi- nite element method: generation, meshing and remeshing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2011; 200(17–20): 1729–1745. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.002.
GaoXZhangXXQianMF, et al.Effect of reinforcement shape on fracture behaviour of SiC/Al composites with network architecture. Compos Struct2019; 215: 411–420. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.067.
46.
GaoHHuangY. Taylor-based nonlocal theory of plasticity. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38(15): 2615–2637. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00173-6.
47.
GaoXZhangXXQianMF, et al.Fracture behaviour of SiCp/Al composites with network architecture. Materialia2020; 12: 100725. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100725.
48.
ShinCSHuangJC. Effect of temper, specimen orientation and test temperature on the tensile and fatigue properties of SiC particles reinforced PM 6061 Al alloy. Int J Fatigue2010; 32(10): 1573–1581. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.02.015.
49.
ZhangJFZhangXXWangQZ, et al.Simulations of deformation and damage processes of SiCp/Al composites during tension. J Mater Sci Technol2018; 34(4): 627–634. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.09.005.
50.
ZhangJFZhangXXWangQZ, et al.Simulation of anisotropic load transfer and stress distribution in sicp/Al composites subjected to tensile loading. Mech Mater2018; 122: 96–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.04.011.
51.
RoySGibmeierJKostovV, et al.Internal load transfer in a metal matrix composite with a three-dimensional interpenetrating structure. Acta Mater2011; 59(4): 1424–1435. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.004.
52.
GaoXZhangXXLiAB. Numerical Study on Mechanical Properties of Quasi-Continuous SiCp/Al Network Composites with Various Particle Size Ratios (PSRs). Int J App Mech2019; 11(7): 1950065. DOI: 10.1142/S1758825119500650.
53.
ThomasonPF. Ductile fracture of metals. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1990.
54.
DengMJWuQDJiXL, et al.The effect of particle morphology and particle size distribution on the property of slip casting SiC. Adv Mater Res2009; 66: 13–16. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.
55.
CoxHL. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br J Appl Phys1952; 3(3): 72–79. DOI: 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
