This paper aimed to evaluate hygrothermal aging effects on polymethyl methacrylate modified with TiO2, SiO2, and Al2O3 nanoparticles in 0.5, 1, and 2% weight fractions. The distribution of nanoparticles was characterized by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) method. Moisture absorption behavior and mechanical properties of samples in terms of elastic modulus, tensile strength, impact strength, and hardness were investigated. Furthermore, the coefficient of hygrothermal expansion (CHE) for each sample was calculated thanks to experimental data. Finally, by applying the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique, the optimum composition for superior performance was obtained in 0.5 wt% of nanoparticles, more specifically for SiO2.
WeitsmanYJElahiM. Effects of fluids on the deformation, strength and durability of polymeric composites–an overview. Mech Time-Dependent Mater2000; 4(2): 107–126.
KhanISaeedKKhanI. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arabian J Chem, 2017.
5.
HanemannTSzabóDV. Polymer-nanoparticle composites: from synthesis to modern applications. Mol Diver Preser Int2010; 6: 3468–3517.
6.
AlamriHLowIM. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of n-SiC fi lled recycled cellulose fi bre reinforced epoxy eco-nanocomposites. Polymer Testing2012; 31(6): 810–818. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.001.
7.
ProlongoSGGudeMRUrenaA. Water uptake of epoxy composites reinforced with carbon nanofillers. Composites A: Appl. Sci. Manufacturing2012; 43(12): 2169–2175.
8.
PrasadVJosephMASekarK. Investigation of mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties of flax fibre reinforced epoxy composite with nano TiO2 addition. Composites A: Appl. Sci. Manufacturing2018; 115: 360–370, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.031.
9.
AgwaMAMegahedMMegahedAA. Enhancement of water barrier properties and tribological performance of hybrid glass fiber/epoxy composites with inclusions of carbon and silica nanoparticles. Polymers for Advanced Technologies. Wiley Online Library2017; 28(9): 1115–1124.
10.
VlasveldDPNGroenewoldJBerseeHEN, et al.Moisture absorption in polyamide-6 silicate nanocomposites and its influence on the mechanical properties. Polymer2005; 46(26): 12567–12576.
11.
AgwaMATahaIMegahedM. Experimental and analytical investigation of water diffusion process in nano-carbon/alumina/silica filled epoxy nanocomposites. Int J Mech Mater Design2017; 13(4): 607–615.
12.
ZhaoHLiRKY. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical and dielectric properties of nano-alumina filled epoxy nanocomposites. Composites A: Appl. Sci. Manufacturing2008; 39(4): 602–611.
13.
US Research Nanomaterials. Al2O3 Co3O4 CuO Fe2O3 Fe3O4 MgO NiO SiO2 TiO2 ZnO ZrO2 ATO SiC Si3N4 ZrC Nanoparticles and Nanopowder | Graphene | Graphene Oxide n.d, https://www.us-nano.com/nanopowders2019, (accessed 18 August 2019).
14.
Ouled AhmedRBAChattiSBen DalyH. Modeling of Hygrothermal Damage of Composite Materials. Mech Advan Composite Struct2016; 3(2): 137–144.
15.
WeitsmanYJ. Fluid Effects in Polymers and Polymeric Composites. USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
16.
YuBYangJ. 1.20 Hygrothermal Effects in Composites. In: BeaumontPWRZwebenCH (eds). Comprehensive Composite Materials II. Oxford: Elsevier; 2018, pp. 502–519.
17.
LiuWHoaS VPughM. Water uptake of epoxy–clay nanocomposites: Model development. Composites Sci Tech2008; 68(1): 156–163.
18.
DhakalHNZhangZYRichardsonMOW. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Composites Sci Tech2007; 67(7): 1674–1683.
19.
CrankJ. The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
20.
McCabeJFWassellRW. Thermal expansion of composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med1995; 6(11): 624–629.
21.
VinsonJRSierakowskiRL. The Behavior of Structures Composed of Composite Materials. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
22.
JenkinsCH. Manual on Experimental Methods for Mechanical Testing of Composites. Fairmont Press, 1998.
23.
ZyoudSHFuchs-HanuschD. A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 78. Elsevier, 2017. 151–181.
24.
HasanzadehRRashahmadiSMemariH. Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Nanocomposites Containing Various Contents of Prevalent Nanofillers from Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Point of View. J Mech2018; 34(4): 461–468.
25.
YousefpourMRahimiA. Characterization and selection of optimal parameters to achieve the best tribological performance of the electrodeposited Cr nanocomposite coating. Mater Design, 54. Elsevier, 2014, pp. 382–389.
26.
SaatyTL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res1990; 48(1): 9–26.
27.
AthawaleVMChakrabortyS. Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study. J Mater: Design Appl2012; 226: 266–285.
28.
HwangC-LYoonK. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer; 1981, pp. 58–191.
29.
SinghHSinghJ. Attribute Based Analysis, Evaluation and Selection of Nanocomposite Using MADM-TOPSIS Approach. J Acad Industrial Res2014; 3(1): 21.
30.
SiotALegerRLonguetC, et al.Dispersion control of raw and modified silica particles in PMMA. Impact on mechanical properties, from experiments to modelling. In: Composites Part B: Engineering, 157. Elsevier, 2019, pp. 163–172.
31.
ZareYRheeKYHuiD. Influences of nanoparticles aggregation/agglomeration on the interfacial/interphase and tensile properties of nanocomposites. Composites B: Eng2017; 122: 41–46.
32.
CurtisARShortallACMarquisPM, et al.Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite. J Dentistry2008; 36(3): 186–193.
33.
DhanpalPYiuCKYKingNM, et al.Effect of temperature on water sorption and solubility of dental adhesive resins. J Dentistry2009; 37(2): 122–132.
34.
ZhuravlevLT. The surface chemistry of amorphous silicaZhuravlev model. Colloid Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects2000; 173(1–3): 1–38.
35.
ValekRHellJ. Impact properties of polymeric nanocomposites with different shape of nanoparticles. Nanocon2011; 9: 21–23.
36.
JahanZNiaziMBKGregersenØW. Mechanical, thermal and swelling properties of cellulose nanocrystals/PVA nanocomposites membranes. J Indust Eng Chem2018; 57: 113–124.
37.
RashahmadiSHasanzadehRMosalmanS. Improving of Mechanical Properties of Poly Methyl Methacrylate Nanocomposites for Dentistry Applications Reinforced with Different Nanoparticles. Polymer-Plastics Tech Eng2017.
38.
KarimzadehAAyatollahiMRShiraziHA. Mechanical properties of a dental nano-composite in moist media determined by nano-scale measurement. Int J Mater Mech Manuf2014; 2(1): 67–72.
39.
RoySNarasimhanK. Characterization and modelling of hygrothermal effects in thermoplastic nanocompositesPolymers & Polymer Composites. Smithers Rapra Tech Limited2011; 19(7): 527.
40.
SaharudinMAtifRInamF. Effect of short-term water exposure on the mechanical properties of halloysite nanotube-multi layer graphene reinforced polyester nanocomposites. Polymers2017; 9(1): 27.
41.
SharmaBMahajanSChhibberR, et al.Glass fiber reinforced polymer-clay nanocomposites: processing, structure and hygrothermal effects on mechanical properties. Procedia Chem2012; 4: 39–46.
42.
AlamriHLowIM. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of n-SiC fi lled recycled cellulose fi bre reinforced epoxy eco-nanocomposites. Polym Test. 2012; 31: 810–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.001.
