Automated manufacturing defects are new types of composite structure defects induced during fiber deposition by robots. Fiber tow gap is one of the most probable types of defects observed in the Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) technique. This defect can affect the structural integrity of structures by reducing structural strength and stiffness. The effect of this defect on the mechanical response of the composite laminates has been investigated experimentally in the literature. However, there is still no efficient numerical/analytical method for damage assessment of composite structures with distributed induced gaps manufactured by the AFP technique. The present paper aims to develop the Induced Defect Layer Method (IDLM), a new robust meso-macro model for damage analysis of the composite laminates with gaps. In this method, a geometrical parameter, Gap Percentage (GP), is implemented to incorporate the effect of induced-gaps in the elastic, inelastic, and softening behavior at the material points. Thus, while the plasticity and failure of the resin pockets in conjunction with intralaminar composite damages can be evaluated by this method, the defective areas are not required to be defined as resin elements in the Finite Element (FE) models. It can also be applied for any arbitrary distributions of the defects in the multi-layer composite structures, making it a powerful tool for continuum damage analysis of large composite structures. Results indicate that the proposed method can consider the effect of gaps in both elastic and inelastic behavior of the composite laminate with defects. It also provides good agreement with the experimental results.
HeineckeFWillbergC.Manufacturing-Induced imperfections in composite parts manufactured via automated fiber placement. J Compos Sci2019; 3: 56.
2.
BelhajMHojjatiM.Wrinkle formation during steering in automated fiber placement: modeling and experimental verification. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 396–409.
3.
BakhshiNHojjatiM.Effect of compaction roller on layup quality and defects formation in automated fiber placement. J Reinf Plast Compos2020; 39: 3–20.
4.
HarikRSaidyCWilliamsSJ, et al. Automated fiber placement defect identity cards: cause, anticipation, existence, significance, and progression. In: SAMPE 18, Long Beach, 21 May 2018.
5.
NarteyMZhangTGongB, et al. Understanding the impact of fibre wrinkle architectures on composite laminates through tailored gaps and overlaps. Compos Part B Eng2020; 196: 108097.
6.
OromiehieEGarbeUGangadhara PrustyB.Porosity analysis of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer laminates manufactured using automated fibre placement. J Compos Mater2020; 54: 1217–1231.
7.
Nixon-PearsonOBelnoueJ-HIvanovD, et al. An experimental investigation of the consolidation behaviour of uncured prepregs under processing conditions. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 1911–1924.
8.
NguyenMHDavidsonPWaasAM.Experimental and numerical study on the tensile failure behavior of toughened-interlayer composite laminates with automated fiber placement (AFP) induced gap and overlap defects. Int J Mater Form2021; 14: 105–115.
9.
KroghCGludJAJakobsenJ.Modeling the robotic manipulation of woven carbon fiber prepreg plies onto double curved molds: a path-dependent problem. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 2149–2164.
10.
LanMCartiéDDaviesP, et al. Influence of embedded gap and overlap fiber placement defects on the microstructure and shear and compression properties of carbon–epoxy laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2016; 82: 198–207.
11.
CroftKLessardLPasiniD, et al. Experimental study of the effect of automated fiber placement induced defects on performance of composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 484–491.
12.
NguyenMHVijayachandranAADavidsonP, et al. Effect of automated fiber placement (AFP) manufacturing signature on mechanical performance of composite structures. Compos Struct2019; 228: 111335.
13.
GuinWEJacksonJRBosleyCM.Effects of tow-to-tow gaps in composite laminates fabricated via automated fiber placement. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2018; 115: 66–75.
14.
SawickiAJMinguetPJ. Effect of intraply overlaps and gaps upon the compression strength of composite laminates. In: Collection of technical papers – AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, 1998, pp.744–754. USA: AIAA.
15.
NimbalSSBankerMMRoopaA, et al. Effect of gap induced waviness on compressive strength of laminated composites. Mater Today Proc2017; 4: 8355–8369.
16.
MaroueneALegayPBoukhiliR.Experimental and numerical investigation on the open-hole compressive strength of AFP composites containing gaps and overlaps. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 3631–3646.
17.
GhayourMGanesanRHojjatiM.Flexural response of composite beams made by automated fiber placement process: effect of fiber tow gaps. Compos Part B Eng2020; 201: 108368.
18.
GhayourMHojjatiMGanesanR.Effect of tow gaps on impact strength of thin composite laminates made by automated fiber placement: experimental and semi-analytical approaches. Compos Struct2020; 248: 112536.
19.
FalcóOLopesCSMayugoJA, et al. Effect of tow-drop gaps on the damage resistance and tolerance of variable-stiffness panels. Compos Struct2014; 116: 94–103.
20.
ElsherbiniYMHoaSV.Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of gaps on fatigue behavior of unidirectional carbon/epoxy automated fiber placement laminates. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 759–772.
21.
WoigkWHallettSRJonesMI, et al. Experimental investigation of the effect of defects in automated fibre placement produced composite laminates. Compos Struct2018; 201: 1004–1017.
22.
BlomAWLopesCSKromwijkPJ, et al. A theoretical model to study the influence of tow-drop areas on the stiffness and strength of variable-stiffness laminates. J Compos Mater2009; 43: 403–425.
23.
FalcóOLopesCSNayaF, et al. Modelling and simulation of tow-drop effects arising from the manufacturing of steered-fibre composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2017; 93: 59–71.
24.
LiXJonesMIWoigkW, et al. Modelling the effect of interacting gaps and overlaps in automated fibre placement (AFP) manufactured laminates. Sci Eng Compos Mater 2015; 22(2): 115--129.
25.
FayazbakhshKArian NikMPasiniD, et al. Defect layer method to capture effect of gaps and overlaps in variable stiffness laminates made by automated fiber placement. Compos Struct2013; 97: 245–251.
MelroARCamanhoPPAndrade PiresFM, et al. Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: part II – micromechanical analyses. Int J Solids Struct2013; 50: 1906–1915.
28.
AboudiJArnoldSBednarcykB.Micromechanics of composite materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc., 2013.
29.
RaghavanPLiSGhoshS. Two scale response and damage modeling of composite materials. Finite Elem Anal Des 2004; 40: 1619--1640.
30.
NaghdinasabMFarrokhabadiAMadadiH.A numerical method to evaluate the material properties degradation in composite RVEs due to fiber-matrix debonding and induced matrix cracking. Finite Elem Anal Des2018; 146: 84–95.
31.
PaleyMAboudiJ.Micromechanical analysis of composites by the generalized cells model. Mech Mater1992; 14: 127–139.
32.
AboudiJ.The generalized method of cells and high-fidelity generalized method of cells micromechanical models – a review. Mech Adv Mater Struct2004; 11: 329–366.
33.
BednarcykBAAboudiJArnoldSM.Micromechanics modeling of composites subjected to multiaxial progressive damage in the constituents. AIAA J2010; 48: 1367–1378.
34.
Aboudi J, Arnold SM and Bednarcyk BA. Chapter 4 - The Method of Cells Micromechanics. In: Aboudi J, Arnold SM, Bednarcyk BABT-M of CM (eds) Micromechanics of Composite Materials. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 147--226.
35.
MelroARCamanhoPPAndrade PiresFM, et al. Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: part I – constitutive modelling. Int J Solids Struct2013; 50: 1897–1905.
36.
McCarthyCTO’HigginsRMFrizzellRM.A cubic spline implementation of non-linear shear behaviour in three-dimensional progressive damage models for composite laminates. Compos Struct2010; 92: 173–181.
37.
PhamDCCuiXRenX, et al. A discrete crack informed 3D continuum damage model and its application for delamination migration in composite laminates. Compos Part B Eng2019; 165: 554–562.
38.
ABAQUS analysis user's manual, version 6.13, Dassault Systoes Simulia Corp, USA, 2013.
39.
FiedlerBHojoMOchiaiS, et al. Finite-element modeling of initial matrix failure in CFRP under static transverse tensile load. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 95–105.
40.
TschoeglNW.Failure surfaces in principal stress space. J Polym Sci, C Polym Symp2007; 32: 239–267.
41.
JumahatASoutisCJonesFR, et al. Fracture mechanisms and failure analysis of carbon fibre/toughened epoxy composites subjected to compressive loading. Compos Struct2010; 92: 295–305.
42.
ShiYPinnaCSoutisC.Modelling impact damage in composite laminates: a simulation of intra- and inter-laminar cracking. Compos Struct2014; 114: 10–19.
43.
FayazbakhshK.The impact of gaps and overlaps on variable stiffness composites manufactured by automated fiber placement. Montreal: McGill University.
44.
GhayourMHojjatiMGanesanR. Effect of manufacturing flaws on the behavior of composite beams manufactured by automated fibre placement (AFP) process. In: The fourth international symposium on automated composite manufacturing ACM4, Montreal, Canada, May 2019.
