Whereas most previous studies have focused on improving the penetration resistance of Shear Thickening Fluids (STFs) treated composites, in this study, the dynamic compressive response of single and multi-ply 3 D E-Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composites with the STF matrix was investigated by using a drop-weight low-velocity impact test. The experimental results revealed the STF improved the compressive and cushioning performance of the composites such that with increasing its concentration, further improvement was observed. The five-ply composite containing the STF of 30 wt% silica nanoparticles and 1 wt% carbon nanotubes (CNTs) reduced the applied peak force by 56% and 26% compared to a steel plate and five-ply neat samples, respectively. A series of repeated impacts was performed, and it was found that the performance of high-concentration composites is further decreased under this type of loading.
DomingosYSFelipeRCFelipeRN, et al.
Evaluation of the environmental aging of the glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite when in contact with the effluent of a treatment plant. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 1385–1402.
2.
VetterTMBibingerJZimmerF, et al.
Characterization of one-sided thermal damage of carbon fiber reinforced polymers by means of depth profiles. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 3699–3713.
3.
CaoQLvXLiX, et al.
High strength expansive concrete-encased-steel filled carbon fiber reinforced polymer tubes under axial monotonic and cyclic load. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 4557–4573.
4.
MacDonnellLSadeghianP.Experimental and analytical behaviour of sandwich composites with glass fiber-reinforced polymer facings and layered fiber mat cores. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 4875–4887.
5.
HassanTARangariVKJeelaniS.Synthesis, processing and characterization of shear thickening fluid (STF) impregnated fabric composites. Mater Sci Eng: A2010;
527: 2892–2899.
6.
YangMQiaoP.Analysis of cushion systems for impact protection design of bridges against overheight vehicle collision. Int J Impact Eng2010;
37: 1220–1228.
7.
Bonin M. An Investigation into the properties of starch-based foams. PhD Thesis, Brunel University School of Engineering and Design, 2010.
8.
LiuYHuHLongH, et al.
Impact compressive behavior of warp-knitted spacer fabrics for protective applications. Text Res J2012 May;
82: 773–788.
9.
YangGLiuXLipikV.Evaluation of silica aerogel-reinforced polyurethane foams for footwear applications. J Mater Sci2018;
53: 9463–9472.
10.
FuWFangYGuY, et al.
Shoe cushioning reduces impact and muscle activation during landings from unexpected, but not self-initiated, drops. J Sci Med Sport2017;
20: 915–920.
11.
LiGRouillardVSekMA.Evaluation of static and dynamic cushioning properties of polyethylene foam for determining its cushion curves. Packag Technol Sci2015;
28: 47–57.
12.
ParkJMKimGSKwonSH, et al.
Modeling and analysis of cushioning performance for multi-layered corrugated structures. J Biosyst Eng2016;
41: 221–231.
13.
WangFZhuBShuL, et al.
Flexible pressure sensors for smart protective clothing against impact loading. Smart Mater Struct2014;
23: 015001.
14.
Xuhong MIAO and Mingqiao GE. Indentation force deflection property of cushioning warp-knitted spacer fabric. Journal of Textile Research 2009; 5.
15.
NayakRKanesalingamSVijayanA, et al.
Design of 3D knitted structures for impact absorption in sportswear. Keg2017;
2: 127–134.
16.
LamCKwanJSSuY, et al.
Performance of ethylene-vinyl acetate foam as cushioning material for rigid debris-resisting barriers. Landslides2018;
15: 1779–1786.
17.
RamirezBJMisraUGuptaV.Viscoelastic foam-filled lattice for high energy absorption. Mech Mater2018;
127: 39–47.
18.
SoutrenonMMichaudV.Impact properties of shear thickening fluid impregnated foams. Smart Mater Struct2014;
23: 035022.
19.
UmerRAlhusseinHZhouJ, et al.
The mechanical properties of 3D woven composites. J Compos Mater2017 May;
51: 1703–1716.
20.
UmairMShakerKJavaidMU, et al.
Effect of weaving patterns on damage resistance of 3D woven jointless T and H shaped reinforcements. Mech Adv Mater Struct2020;
16: 1–4.
21.
WanYSunBGuB.Multi-scale structure modeling of damage behaviors of 3D orthogonal woven composite materials subject to quasi-static and high strain rate compressions. Mech Mater2016;
94: 1–25.
22.
LiDSZhaoCQJiangN, et al.
Fabrication, properties and failure of 3D integrated woven spacer composites with thickened face sheets. Mater Lett2015;
148: 103–105.
23.
Wang H, Li TT, Wu L, et al. Spacer fabric/flexible polyurethane foam composite sandwiches: Structural design and quasi-static compressive, bursting and dynamic impact performances. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials 2019; 2019: 1099636219859629.
24.
MihailovicTVAsanovicKACerovicDD.Structural design of face fabrics and the core as a premise for compression behavior of 3D woven sandwich fabric. J Sandw Struct Mater2018;
20: 718–734.
25.
ChuYRahmanMRMinS, et al.
Experimental and numerical study of inter-yarn friction affecting mechanism on ballistic performance of twaron® fabric. Mech Mater2020;
148: 103421.
26.
BarnesHAHuttonJFWaltersK.An introduction to rheology.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 1989.
27.
BenderJWagnerNJ.Reversible shear thickening in monodisperse and bidisperse colloidal dispersions. J Rheol1996;
40: 899–916.
28.
AroraSMajumdarASingh ButolaB.Interplay of fabric structure and shear thickening fluid impregnation in moderating the impact response of high-performance woven fabrics. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 4387–4395.
29.
GongXXuYZhuW, et al.
Study of the knife stab and puncture-resistant performance for shear thickening fluid enhanced fabric. J Compos Mater2014;
48: 641–657. Mar
30.
ZhaoCWangYCaoS, et al.
Conductive shear thickening gel/kevlar wearable fabrics: a flexible body armor with mechano-electric coupling ballistic performance. Compos Sci Technol2019;
182: 107782.
31.
MawkhliengUMajumdarA.Deconstructing the role of shear thickening fluid in enhancing the impact resistance of high-performance fabrics. Compos B: Eng2019;
175: 107167.
32.
LeeYSWetzelEDWagnerNJ.The ballistic impact characteristics of kevlar® woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid. J Mater Sci2003;
38: 2825–2833.
33.
GürgenS.An investigation on composite laminates including shear thickening fluid under stab condition. J Compos Mater2019;
53: 1111–1122.
34.
AbbaszadehAYazdaniMAbbasiF, et al.
Investigating the behavior of silicon-coated kevlar fabric under low-velocity impact: an experimental and numerical study. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2019;
32: 635–656.
35.
GürgenSKuşhanMC.The effect of silicon carbide additives on the stab resistance of shear thickening fluid treated fabrics. Mech Adv Mater Struct2017;
24: 1381–1390.
36.
BajyaMMajumdarAButolaBS, et al.
Design strategy for optimising weight and ballistic performance of soft body armour reinforced with shear thickening fluid. Compos B: Eng2020;
183: 107721.
37.
HasanzadehMMottaghitalabVBabaeiH, et al.
The influence of carbon nanotubes on quasi-static puncture resistance and yarn pull-out behavior of shear-thickening fluids (STFs) impregnated woven fabrics. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2016;
88: 263–271.
38.
SantosTFSantosCMFonsecaRT, et al.
Experimental analysis of the impact protection properties for kevlar® fabrics under different orientation layers and non-Newtonian fluid compositions. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 3515.
39.
GürgenSKuşhanMC.The stab resistance of fabrics impregnated with shear thickening fluids including various particle size of additives. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2017;
94: 50–60.
40.
Hasan-NezhadHYazdaniMSalami-KalajahiM, et al.
Mechanical behavior of 3D GFRP composite with pure and treated shear thickening fluid matrix subject to quasi-static puncture and shear impact loading. J Compos Mater2020 May;
54: 3933–3948.
41.
SrivastavaAMajumdarAButolaBS.Improving the impact resistance performance of kevlar fabrics using silica based shear thickening fluid. Mater Sci Eng: A2011;
529: 224–229.
42.
ParkYKimYBaluchAH, et al.
Empirical study of the high velocity impact energy absorption characteristics of shear thickening fluid (STF) impregnated kevlar fabric. Int J Impact Eng2014;
72: 67–74.
43.
DeckerMJHalbachCJNamCH, et al.
Stab resistance of shear thickening fluid (STF)-treated fabrics. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 565–578.
44.
HasanzadehMMottaghitalabV.The role of shear-thickening fluids (STFs) in ballistic and stab-resistance improvement of flexible armor. J Mater Eng Perform2014;
23: 1182–1196.
45.
FuKWangHChangL, et al.
Low-velocity impact behaviour of a shear thickening fluid (STF) and STF-filled sandwich composite panels. Compos Sci Technol2018;
165: 74–83.
46.
MajumdarALahaABhattacharjeeD, et al.
Tuning the structure of 3D woven aramid fabrics reinforced with shear thickening fluid for developing soft body armour. Compos Struct2017;
178: 415–425.
47.
KimYParkYChaJ, et al.
Behavior of shear thickening fluid (STF) impregnated fabric composite rear wall under hypervelocity impact. Compos Struct2018;
204: 52–62.
48.
HoffmanRL.Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. I. Observation of a flow instability. Trans Soc Rheol1972;
16: 155–173.
49.
HoffmanRL.Explanations for the cause of shear thickening in concentrated colloidal suspensions. J Rheol1998;
42: 111–123.
50.
BossisGBradyJF.The rheology of Brownian suspensions. J Chem Physics1989;
91: 1866–1874.
51.
GürgenSKuşhanMCLiW.Shear thickening fluids in protective applications: a review. Progr Polym Sci2017;
75: 48–72.
52.
LinNYGuyBMHermesM, et al.
Hydrodynamic and contact contributions to continuous shear thickening in colloidal suspensions. Phys Rev Lett2015;
115: 228304.
53.
ShaXYuKCaoH, et al.
Shear thickening behavior of nanoparticle suspensions with carbon nanofillers. J Nanopart Res2013;
15: 1816.
54.
HasanzadehMMottaghitalabV.Tuning of the rheological properties of concentrated silica suspensions using carbon nanotubes. Rheol Acta2016;
55: 759–766.
55.
ObradovićVStojanovićDBJokićB, et al.
Nanomechanical and anti-stabbing properties of kolon fabric composites reinforced with hybrid nanoparticles. Compos B: Eng2017;
108: 143–152. Jan 1
56.
WuEChangLC.Woven glass/epoxy laminates subject to projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng1995;
16: 607–619.
57.
ShenCWuZGaoZ, et al.
Impact protection behavior of NiTi shape memory alloy wires. Mater Sci Eng: A2017;
700: 132–139.
58.
ChenYMayIM.Reinforced concrete members under drop-weight impacts. Proc Instit Civil Eng – Struct Build2009;
162: 45–56.
59.
AymerichFMarcialisPMeiliS, et al.
An instrumented drop-weight machine for low-velocity impact testing. WIT Trans Built Environ1970;
25.
60.
YuJLWangXWeiZG, et al.
Deformation and failure mechanism of dynamically loaded sandwich beams with aluminum-foam core. Int J Impact Eng2003;
28: 331–347.
61.
WangHRamakrishnanKRShankarK.Experimental study of the medium velocity impact response of sandwich panels with different cores. Mater Des2016;
99: 68–82.
FabbrocinoFFarinaIModanoM.Loading noise effects on the system identification of composite structures by dynamic tests with vibrodyne. Compos B: Eng2017;
115: 376–383.
64.
GürgenSKuşhanMCLiW.The effect of carbide particle additives on rheology of shear thickening fluids. Korea-Aust Rheol J2016;
28: 121–128.
65.
Banthia NP. Impact resistance of concrete. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, 1987.
