Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-6
A novel particle-filled carbon-fibre reinforced polymer model composite tailored for the application of digital volume correlation and computed tomography
This paper presents the development of novel Carbon-Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) laminates, tailored for the application of Digital Volume Correlation (DVC) and Computed Tomography (CT) to experimental mechanics analyses of these materials. Analogous to surface-based Digital Image Correlation (DIC), DVC is a relatively novel volumetric method that utilizes CT data to quantify internal three-dimensional (3D) displacements and implicit strain fields. The highly anisotropic and somewhat regular/self-similar microstructures found in well-aligned unidirectional (UD) materials at high fibre volume fractions are intrinsically challenging for DVC, especially along the fibre direction at microstructural length-scales on the order of a few fibre diameters. To permit the application of DVC to displacement and/or strain measurements parallel to the fibre orientation, the matrix was doped with a sparse population of sub-micrometre particles to act as displacement trackers (i.e. fiducial markers). Barium titanate particles (400 nm, ∼1.44 vol. %) were found to offer the most favourable compromise between contrast in CT images and the ability to obtain a homogeneous distribution in 3D space with sufficient particle compactness for local DVC analyses. This property combination was selected following an extensive Micro-focus Computed Tomography (µCT)-based qualitative assessment on a wide test matrix, that included 38 materials manufactured with a range of possible particle compositions, mean sizes and concentrations. By comparing the tensile behaviour of the particle-adapted material alongside its particle-free counterpart, we demonstrate through the application of in situ Synchrotron Radiation Computed Tomography (SRCT) that the macro- and micromechanical responses of the newly developed CFRP are consistent with standard production materials indicating its suitability as a model system for mechanistic investigations.
SwolfsYMortonHScottAE, et al.
Synchrotron radiation computed tomography for experimental validation of a tensile strength model for unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites. Composites Part A2015;
77: 106–113.
2.
BohseJ.Acoustic emission characteristics of micro-failure processes in polymer blends and composites. Compos Sci Technol2000;
60: 1213–1226.
3.
De GreefNGorbatikhLGodaraA, et al.
The effect of carbon nanotubes on the damage development in carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Carbon2011;
49: 4650–4664.
4.
ScottAEMavrogordatoMNWrightP, et al.
In situ fibre fracture measurement in carbon-epoxy laminates using high resolution computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol2011;
71: 1471–1477.
5.
ScottAESinclairISpearingSM, et al.
Damage accumulation in a carbon/epoxy composite: comparison between a multiscale model and computed tomography experimental results. Composites Part A2012;
43: 1514–1522.
6.
BlassiauSBunsellARThionnetA.Damage accumulation processes and life prediction in unidirectional composites. Proc R Soc A2007;
463: 1135–1152.
7.
SchöberlEMavrogordatoMNSinclairI, et al.
Fibre-direction strain measurement in a composite ply under pure bending using digital volume correlation and micro-focus computed tomography. J Compos Mater2020;
54: 1889–1912.
8.
SchöberlEBreiteCMelnikovA, et al.
Fibre-direction strain measurement in a composite ply under quasi-static tensile loading using digital volume correlation and in situ synchrotron radiation computed tomography. Composites Part A2020; 137: 105935.
9.
SwolfsYVerpoestIGorbatikhL.A review of input data and modelling assumptions in longitudinal strength models for unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites. Compos Struct2016;
150: 153–172.
10.
WatanabeJTanakaFOkudaH, et al.
Tensile strength distribution of carbon fibers at short gauge lengths. Adv Compos Mater2014;
23: 535–550.
11.
PhoenixSLBeyerleinIJ. Chapter 1.19 – statistical strength theory for fibrous composite materials. In: Kelly A and Zweben C (eds) Comprehensive composite materials. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 2000, pp. 559–639.
12.
RosenBW.Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA J1964;
2: 1985–1991.
13.
SwolfsYGorbatikhLRomanovV, et al.
Stress concentrations in an impregnated fibre bundle with random fibre packing. Compos Sci Technol2013;
74: 113–120.
14.
SwolfsYMcMeekingRMVerpoestI, et al.
Matrix cracks around fibre breaks and their effect on stress redistribution and failure development in unidirectional composites. Compos Sci Technol2015;
108: 16–22.
15.
NedeleMRWisnomMR.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress concentration at a single fibre break. Compos Sci Technol1994;
51: 517–524.
16.
NedeleMRWisnomMR.Stress concentration factors around a broken fibre in a unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy. Composites1994;
25: 549–557.
17.
ThionnetAChouHYBunsellAR.Fibre break processes in unidirectional composites. Composites Part A2014;
65: 148–160.
18.
SwolfsYVerpoestIGorbatikhL.Issues in strength models for unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites related to Weibull distributions, fibre packings and boundary effects. Compos Sci Technol2015;
114: 42–49.
19.
GarceaSCSinclairISpearingSM, et al.
Mapping fibre failure in situ in carbon fibre reinforced polymers by fast synchrotron X-ray computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol2017;
149: 81–89.
20.
RosiniSMavrogordatoMNEgorovaO, et al.
In situ statistical measurement of local morphology in carbon-epoxy composites using synchrotron X-ray computed tomography. Composites Part A2019;
125: 1–14.
21.
PickeringKLBaderMGKimberAC.Damage accumulation during the failure of uniaxial carbon fibre composites. Composites Part A1998;
29: 435–441.
22.
PaganoNJ.On the micromechanical failure modes in a class of ideal brittle matrix composites. Part 1 – coated-fiber composites. Composites Part B1998;
29: 93–119.
BunsellARThionnetA.Failure processes governing long term reliability of carbon fibre composites structures. Compos Nanostruct2015;
7: 216–224.
27.
MoffatAJWrightPBuffiereJ-Y, et al.
Micromechanisms of damage in 0° splits in a [90/0]s composite material using synchrotron radiation computed tomography. Scripta Mater2008;
59: 1043–1046.
28.
WrightPMoffatAJSinclairI, et al.
High resolution tomographic imaging and modelling of notch tip damage in a laminated composite. Compos Sci Technol2010;
70: 1444–1452.
29.
BunsellAGorbatikhLMortonH, et al.
Benchmarking of strength models for unidirectional composites under longitudinal tension. Composites Part A2018;
111: 138–150.
30.
HuangYYoungRJ.Analysis of the fragmentation test for carbon-fibre/epoxy model composites by means of Raman spectroscopy. Compos Sci Technol1994;
52: 505–517.
31.
HuangYYoungRJ.Interfacial behaviour in high temperature cured carbon fibre/epoxy resin model composite. Composites1995;
26: 541–550.
32.
van den HeuvelPWJPeijsTYoungRJ.Analysis of stress concentrations in multi-fibre microcomposites by means of Raman spectroscopy. J Mater Sci Lett1996;
15: 1908–1911.
33.
van den HeuvelPWJPeijsTYoungRJ.Failure phenomena in two-dimensional multi-fibre microcomposites. Part 4 – a Raman spectroscopic study on the influence of the matrix yield stress on stress concentrations. Composites Part A2000;
31: 165–171.
34.
PanBQianKXieH, et al.
Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol2009;
20: 062001–062017.
35.
BayBKSmithTSFyhrieDP, et al.
Digital volume correlation: three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography. Exp Mech1999;
39: 217–226.
36.
AdamJKlinkmüllerMSchreursG, et al.
Quantitative 3D strain analysis in analogue experiments simulating tectonic deformation: integration of X-ray computed tomography and digital volume correlation techniques. J Struct Geol2013;
55: 127–149.
37.
XuF.Quantitative characterization of deformation and damage process by digital volume correlation: a review. Theoret Appl Mech Lett2018;
8: 83–96.
38.
BayBK.Methods and applications of digital volume correlation. J Strain Anal Eng Des2008;
43: 745–760.
39.
WangLLimodinNBartaliAE, et al.
Influence of pores on crack initiation in monotonic tensile and cyclicloadings in lost foam casting A319 alloy by using 3D in-situ analysis. Mater Sci Eng A2016;
673: 362–372.
40.
BorstnarGGillardFMavrogordatoMN, et al.
Three-dimensional deformation mapping of mode I interlaminar crack extension in particle-toughened interlayers. Acta Mater2016;
103: 63–70.
41.
BraultRGermaneauADupréJC, et al.
In-situ analysis of laminated composite materials by X-ray micro-computed tomography and digital volume correlation. Exp Mech2013;
53: 1143–1151.
42.
McGrathLMParnasRSKingSH, et al.
Investigation of the thermal, mechanical, and fracture properties of alumina-epoxy composites. Polymer2008;
49: 999–1014.
43.
ChenCJusticeRSSchaeferDW, et al.
Highly dispersed nanosilica-epoxy resins with enhanced mechanical properties. Polymer2008;
49: 3805–3815.
44.
Toray Industries Inc. Toraycomposite materials. Tokyo, Japan: Author, 2019.
US Research Nanomaterials Inc.Micron powders. Houston, TX: Author,
2019.
47.
LandisENKeaneDT.X-ray microtomography. Mater Character2010;
61: 1305–1316.
48.
MaireEBuffièreJ-YSalvoL, et al.
On the application of X-ray microtomography in the field of materials science. Adv Eng Mater2001;
3: 539–546.
49.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). X-ray mass attenuation coefficients, Physical Measurement Laboratory (PML), www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients. (accessed 1 June 2017).
Carl ZeissAG.Xradia 510 versa.
Oberkochen,
Germany: Author, 2018.
54.
SchindelinJArganda-CarrerasIFriseE, et al.
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods2012;
9: 676–682.
55.
BreiteCGorbatikhLSwolfsY, et al. Benchmarking exercise II for longitudinal strength models of unidirectional composites – instructions for participants. Marie Skłodowska-Curie European training network FiBreMoD.
Leuven,
Belgium, 2018.
56.
SuhotMAChambersAR. The effect of voids on the flexural fatigue performance of unidirectional carbon fibre composites. In: 16th international conference on composite materials, Kyoto, Japan, 8–13 July 2007.
57.
ScottAESinclairISpearingSM, et al.
Influence of voids on damage mechanisms in carbon/epoxy composites determined via high resolution computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol2014;
90: 147–153.
58.
TanakaFOkabeTOkudaH, et al.
Factors controlling the strength of carbon fibres in tension. Composites Part A2014;
57: 88–94.
59.
OkabeTTakedaN.Size effect on tensile strength of unidirectional CFRP composites – experiment and simulation. Compos Sci Technol2002;
62: 2053–2064.
60.
ScottAE.Analysis of a hybrid composite pressure vessel using multi-scale computed tomography techniques. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2011.
61.
MortonH.3D Imaging of the tensile failure mechanisms of carbon fibre composites. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2014.
