The concept of the “effective stiffness” for plies in laminates containing intralaminar cracks is revisited presenting rather accurate fitting expressions for the effective stiffness dependence on crack density in the ply. In this article, the effective stiffness at certain crack density is back-calculated from the stiffness difference between the undamaged and damaged laminate. Earlier finite element method analysis of laminates with cracked 90-plies showed that the effective longitudinal modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the ply do not change during cracking, whereas the transverse modulus reduction can be described by a simple crack density dependent function. In this article, focus is on the remaining effective constant: in-plane shear modulus. Finite element method parametric analysis shows that the dependence on crack density is exponential and the fitting function is almost independent of geometrical and elastic parameters of the surrounding plies. The above independence justifies using the effective ply stiffness in expressions of the classical laminate theory to predict the intralaminar cracking caused stiffness reduction in laminates with off-axis plies. Results are in a very good agreement with (a) finite element method calculations; (b) experimental data, and (c) with the GLOB-LOC model, which gives a very accurate solution in cases where the crack face opening and sliding displacements are accurately described.
ParviziABaileyJE. On multiple transverse cracking in glass fibre epoxy cross-ply laminates. J Mater Sci1978; 13: 2131–2136.
2.
Jamison RD, Schulte K, Reifsnider KL, et al. Characterization and analysis of damage mechanisms in tension-tension fatigue of Graphite/Epoxy laminates. ASTM STP 836, 1984, pp. 21–55.
3.
JoffeRVarnaJ. Analytical modeling of stiffness reduction in symmetric and balanced laminates due to cracks in 90° layers. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 1641–1652.
4.
VarnaJJoffeRAkshantalaNV, et al.Damage in composite laminates with off-axis plies. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 2139–2147.
5.
VarnaJ. Strategies for stiffness analysis of laminates with microdamage: combining average stress and crack face displacement based methods. Z Angew Math Mech2015; 95: 1081–1097.
6.
Nairn J and Hu S. Matrix microcracking. In: Pipes RB and Talreja R (eds) Damage mechanics of composite materials. Composite materials series, vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994, pp. 187–243.
7.
SmithPAWoodJR. Poisson’s ratio as a damage parameter in the static tensile loading of simple cross-ply laminates. Compos Sci Technol1990; 38: 85–93.
8.
KashtalyanMSoutisC. Analysis of composite laminates with intra- and interlaminar damage. Prog Aerosp Sci2005; 41: 152–173.
9.
TanSCNuismerRJ. A theory for progressive matrix cracking in composite laminates. J Compos Mater1989; 23: 1029–1047.
10.
HashinZ. Analysis of cracked laminates: a variational approach. Mech Mater1985; 4: 121–136.
11.
VarnaJBerglundLA. Multiple transverse cracking and stiffness reduction in cross-ply laminates. J Compos Technol Res1991; 13: 97–106.
12.
VarnaJBerglundLA. Thermo-elastic properties of composite laminates with transverse cracks. J Compos Technol Res1994; 16: 77–87.
13.
ZhangJFanJSoutisC. Analysis of multiple matrix cracking in [±θm/90 n]s composite laminates. Part 1. In-plane stiffness properties. Composites1992; 23: 291–304.
McCartneyLNSchoeppnerGABeckerW. Comparison of models for transverse ply cracks in composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 2347–2359.
16.
HajikazemiMMcCartneyNL. Comparison of variational and generalized plane strain approaches for matrix cracking in general symmetric laminates. Int J Damage Mech2018; 27: 507–540.
17.
HajikazemiMSadrMH. A variational model for stress analysis in cracked laminates with arbitrary symmetric lay-up under general in-plane loading. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51: 516–529.
18.
LundmarkPVarnaJ. Constitutive relationships for laminates with ply cracks in in-plane loading. Int J Damage Mech2005; 14: 235–261.
19.
LundmarkPVarnaJ. Crack face sliding effect on stiffness of laminates with ply cracks. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 1444–1454.
GudmundsonPÖstlundS. First order analysis of stiffness reduction due to matrix cracking. J Compos Mater1992; 26: 1009–1030.
22.
GudmundsonPZangW. A universal model for thermoelastic properties of macro cracked composite laminates. Int J Sol Struct1993; 30: 3211–3231.
23.
NuismerRJTanSC. Constitutive relations of a cracked composite lamina. J Compos Mater1988; 22: 306–321.
24.
LundmarkPVarnaJ. Stiffness reduction in laminates at high intralaminar crack density: effect of crack interaction. Int J Damage Mech2011; 20: 279–297.
25.
LoukilMSVarnaJAyadiZ. Engineering expressions for thermo-elastic constants of laminates with high density of transverse cracks. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2013; 48: 37–46.
26.
LoukilMSVarnaJ. Crack face sliding displacement (CSD) in exact expressions for in-plane elastic constants of symmetric damaged laminates. Int J Damage Mech2019.
27.
VarnaJLoukilM. Effective transverse modulus of a damaged layer used in the framework of CLT: sensitivity to used materials and laminate lay-up. Compos Mater2017; 51: 1945–1959.
28.
SmithPAOginSL. On transverse matrix cracking in cross-ply laminates loaded in simple bending. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf1999; 30: 1003–1008.
29.
SmithPAOginSL. Characterization and modelling of matrix cracking in a (0/90)2 s GFRP laminate loaded in flexure. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci2000; 456: 2755–2770.
30.
LadevezePLubineauG. An enhanced mesomodel for laminates based on micromechanics. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 533–541.
31.
LadevezePLubineauG. On a damage mesomodel for laminates: micromechanics basis and improvement. Mech Mater2003; 35: 763–775.
32.
LaurinFCarrereNHuchetteC, et al.A multiscale hybrid approach for damage and final failure predictions of composites structures. J Compos Mater2013; 47: 2713–2747.
33.
PupursAVarnaJLoukilM, et al.Effective stiffness concept in bending modeling of laminates with damage in surface 90-layers. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2016; 82: 244–252.
34.
KaterelosDGKashtalyanMSoutisC, et al.Matrix cracking in polymeric composites laminates: modelling and experiments. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 2310–2317.
35.
Katerelos DG, Galiotis C, Ogin SL, et al. Determination of stiffness reduction and residual strain caused by transverse cracking using an embedded aramid fiber strain sensor. In: ECCM 9. Composites from fundamentals to exploitation. Proceedings of the conference in CD-ROM, 2000.
KnopsM. Analysis of failure in fiber polymer laminates, New York: Springer, 2008.
38.
Kahla HB. Micro-cracking and delaminations of composite laminates under tensile quasi-static and cyclic loading. Doctoral Dissertation, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, 2019.
39.
Varna J. Crack separation based models for microcracking. Comprehensive Composite Materials II. New York: Elsevier, 2018, vol. 2, pp. 192–220.
