Autoclave curing process is one of the most frequently used manufacturing techniques of thermosetting composite materials. An efficient curing process requires good understanding of the thermal behavior of molds and composites during autoclave processing. In this paper, the effect of thermal gradients on curing performance of laminates is investigated through numerical approaches. In the first section, a computational fluid dynamics–finite element method numerical model is established to simulate the temperature field and the process-induced deformation of laminates. Then, a curved composite part with two different structures of mold is introduced to exhibit different temperature and degree of cure gradients during the autoclave process. Furthermore, by analyzing the position errors of measurement points, the deformation of the composite parts in different molds is evaluated. The results suggested that more synchronous curing process and less deformation of the composite part can be achieved by reducing the thermal gradients. In this specific case of a curved part, the range of position errors in X direction (the length direction) is reduced by 86.9% with the redesigned mold.
WucherBMartinyPLaniF, et al.Simulation-driven mold compensation strategy for composites: experimental validation on a doubly-curved part. Compos Part A2017; 102: 96–107.
2.
PusatciogluSYHasslerJCFricheAL, et al.Effect of temperature gradients on cure and stress gradient in thick thermoset composite. J Appl Polym Sci1980; 25: 381–393.
CiriscioliPRWangQSpringerGS. Autoclave curing – comparisons of model and test results. J Compos Mater1992; 26(1): 90–102.
5.
TelikicherlaMKAltanMCLaiFC. Autoclave curing of thermosetting composites: process modeling for the cure assembly. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer1994; 21(6): 785–797.
6.
TelikicherlaMKAltanMCLaiFC. Numerical study of conjugate heat transfer in autoclave curing of thermosetting composites. ASME-PUBLICATIONS-HTD1994; 289: 213–221.
7.
SalagnacPDutourniePGlouannecP. Curing of composites by radiation and natural convection in an autoclave. AICHE J2004; 50(12): 3149–3159.
8.
KlugeNEJLundstromTSWesterbergLG, et al.Modelling heat transfer inside an autoclave: effect of radiation. J Reinf Plast Compos2016; 35: 1126–1142.
9.
JohnstonAHubertPVaziriR, et al.An investigation of autoclave convective heat transfer. Des Manuf Compos1998; 15(1): 106–113.
10.
Hudek M. Examination of heat transfer during autoclave processing of polymer composites. Master's Thesis. University of Manitoba, Canada, 2001.
11.
Slesinger N, Shimizu T, Arafath ARA, et al. Hear transfer coefficient distribution inside an autoclave. In: 17th international conference on composite material ICCM, Edinburgh, 27–31 July 2009.
12.
WeberTAArentJCMunchL, et al.A fast method for the generation of boundary conditions for thermal autoclave simulation. Compos Part A2016; 88: 216–225.
13.
WeberTAArentJCSteffensL, et al.Thermal optimization of composite autoclave molds using the shift factor approach for boundary condition estimation. J Compos Mater2017; 51(12): 1753–1767.
14.
RaiNPitchumaniR. Optimal cure cycle for the fabrication of thermosetting-matrix composites. Polym Compos1997; 18(4): 566–581.
15.
OliverPCottuJP. Optimisation of the co-curing of two different composites with the aim of minimizing residual stresses in composite materials. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(5): 645–651.
16.
LiMZhuQGeubellePH, et al.Optimal curing for thermoset matrix composites: thermochemical considerations. Polym Compos2001; 22: 118–131.
17.
GopalAKAdaliSVerijenkoVE. Optimal temperature profiles for minimum residual stress in the cure process of polymer composites. Compos Struct2000; 48: 99–106.
18.
ShahPHHallsVAZhengJQ, et al.Optimal cure cycle parameters for minimizing residual stresses in fiber-reinforced polymer composite laminates. J Compos Mater2017; 52(6): 773–792.
19.
StruzzieroGSkordosAA. Multi-objective optimisation of the cure of thick components. Compos Part A2017; 93: 126–136.
20.
MaffezzoliAGriecoA. Optimization of parts placement in autoclave processing of composites. Appl Compos Mater2013; 20: 233–248.
21.
DiosMGonzalez-RPLDiosD, et al.A mathematical modeling approach to optimize composite parts placement in autoclave. Int Trans Oper Res2016; 24(1–2): 115–141.
22.
WangQWangLYZhuWD, et al.Design optimization of molds for autoclave process of composite manufacturing. J Reinf Plast Compos2017; 35: 1564–1576.
23.
Johnston A. An integrated model of the development of process-induced deformations in autoclave processing of composite structures. PhD Thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1997.
24.
LeeWILoosACSpringerGS. Heat of reaction, degree of cure, and viscosity of Hercules 3501-6 resin. J Compos Mater1982; 16: 510–520.
25.
BogettiTAGillespieJJW. Process-induced stress and deformation in thick-section thermoset composite laminates. J Compos Mater1992; 26(5): 68.
26.
WangLYZhuWDWangQ, et al.A heat-balance method for autoclave process of composite manufacturing. J Compos Mater. 2018; 53(5): 641–652.
27.
ZhuQGeubellePHLiM, et al.Dimensional accuracy of thermoset composites: simulation of process-induced residual stresses. J Compos Mater2001; 35(24): 2171–2205.
28.
KiasatMS. Curing shrinkage and residual stresses in viscoelastic thermosetting resins and composites. . PhD Thesis. TU Delft, The Netherlands, 2000.
29.
RussellJD. Cure shrinkage of thermoset composites. SAMPE Quart1993; 29: 28–33.
30.
WhiteSRHahnHT. Process modeling of composite materials: residual stress development during cure, part II: experimental validation. J Compos Mater1992; 26(16): 2423–2453.
31.
WhiteSRKimYK. Process-induced residual stresses analysis of AS4/3501-6 composite material. Mech Compos Mater Struct1998; 5(2): 153–186.
32.
UmeyamaS. Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal1991; 13: 376–380.
