The aim of this study is to put forth the synergistic effect of carbon fiber reinforcement and ethylene-butyl acrylate compatibilization on the mechanical and wear performance of polypropylene/poly(lactic acid) blend composites and to find an inspiration about their availability for diverse applications as stronger renewable composites. Crystalline morphologies are greatly affected by these concentrations. Synergistic inclusion of both poly(lactic acid) and ethylene-butyl acrylate copolymer in polypropylene matrix was found to effectively enhance the nucleation of β-crystals which may provide secondary mechanism of reinforcement. Despite the island-sea type immiscible morphology, ethylene-butyl acrylate incorporation offered potential toughening effect for polypropylene/poly(lactic acid) system due to its ethylene molecules which have more flexibility and an elongation than poly(lactic acid). As expected, the increase in carbon fiber concentration in the composites indicated a positive correlation with mechanical test results. However, contrary to ethylene-butyl acrylate compatibilization, high rigidity obtained by carbon fiber contribution was not beneficial from the abrasive wear resistance point of view, due to repeated ploughing effect of the counterpart material.
Ebadi-DehaghaniHBarikaniMKhonakdarHAet al.Microstructure and non-isothermal crystallization behavior of PP/PLA/clay hybrid nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim2015; 121: 1321–1332.
2.
YooTWYoonHGChoiSJet al.Effects of compatibilizers on the mechanical properties and interfacial tension of polypropylene and poly(lactic acid) blends. Macromol Res2010; 18: 583–588.
3.
Ebadi-DehaghaniHKhonakdarHABarikaniMet al.Experimental and theoretical analyses of mechanical properties of PP/PLA/clay nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng2015; 69: 133–144.
4.
KangHLuXXuY. Properties of immiscible and ethylene-butyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer compatibilized poly(lactic acid) and polypropylene blends. Polym Test2015; 43: 173–181.
5.
LeeHSKimJD. Effect of a hybrid compatibilizer on the mechanical properties and interfacial tension of a ternary blend with polypropylene, poly(lactic acid), and a toughening modifier. Polym Compos2012; 33: 1154–1161.
6.
ArvidsonSAWongKCGorgaREet al.Structure, molecular orientation, and resultant mechanical properties in core/sheath poly(lactic acid)/polypropylene composites. Polymer2012; 53: 791–800.
7.
Pivsa-ArtSKord-Sa-ArdJPivsa-ArtWet al.Effect of compatibilizer on PLA/PP blend for injection molding. Energy Procedia2016; 89: 353–360.
8.
AbayAKGebeyehuMBLinHKet al.Preparation and characterization of poly(lactic acid)/recycled polypropylene blends with and without the coupling agent, n-(6-aminohexyl)aminomethyltriethoxysilane. J Polym Res2016; 23: 1–12.
9.
BaiZDouQ. Rheology, morphology, crystallization behaviors, mechanical and thermal properties of poly(lactic acid)/polypropylene/maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene blends. J Polym Environ2018; 26: 959–969.
10.
Ebadi-DehaghaniHBarikaniMKhonakdarHAet al.On O2 gas permeability of PP/PLA/clay nanocomposites: a molecular dynamic simulation approach. Polym Test2015; 45: 139–151.
11.
LeeT-WJeongYG. Enhanced electrical conductivity, mechanical modulus, and thermal stability of immiscible polylactide/polypropylene blends by the selective localization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol2014; 103: 78–84.
12.
ReddyNNamaDYangY. Polylactic acid/polypropylene polyblend fibers for better resistance to degradation. Polym Degrad Stabil2008; 93: 233–241.
13.
Ebadi-DehaghaniHKhonakdarHABarikaniMet al.An investigation on compatibilization threshold in the interface of polypropylene/polylactic acid blends using rheological studies. J Vinyl Addit Techn2016; 22: 19–28.
14.
DiYKangMZhaoYet al.Morphology and mechanical properties of blends of thermoplastic polyurethane and polyolefins. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 99: 875–883.
15.
PötschkePWallheinkeK. Blends of thermoplastic polyurethane and maleic-anhydride grafted polyethylene. I. Morphology and mechanical properties. Polym Eng Sci1999; 39: 1035–1048.
16.
LuQ-WMacoskoCW. Comparing the compatibility of various functionalized polypropylenes with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Polymer2004; 45: 1981–1991.
17.
PloypetcharaNSuppakulPAtongDet al.Blend of polypropylene/poly(lactic acid) for medical packaging application: physicochemical, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties. Energy Procedia2014; 56: 201–210.
18.
JariyakulsithPPuajindanetrS. Relationship between compatibilizer and yield strength of PLA/PP blend. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2018; 303: 1–6.
19.
ChoudharyPMohantySNayakSKet al.Poly(L-lactide)/polypropylene blends: evaluation of mechanical, thermal, and morphological characteristics. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 121: 3223–3237.
20.
AghjehMRKazerouniYOtadiMet al.A combined experimental and theoretical approach to quantitative assessment of microstructure in PLA/PP/organo-clay nanocomposites; wide-angle X-ray scattering and rheological analysis. Compos Part B Eng2018; 137: 235–246.
21.
LiYZhengYZhanPet al.Vapor sensing performance as a diagnosis probe to estimate the distribution of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in poly(lactic acid)/polypropylene conductive composites. Sensor Actuat B Chem2018; 255: 2809–2819.
22.
Ying-ChenZHong-YanWYi-PingQ. Morphology and properties of hybrid composites based on polypropylene/polylactic acid blend and bamboo fiber. Bioresource Technol2010; 101: 7944–7950.
23.
HausmannKRiouxBLeeCY. Modifier offers low cost alternative for plastics. Plast Addit Compound2002; 4: 18–19.
HausmannKChouR. Additives with dual function-acrylate ester copolymers as modifiers for engineering polymers and as carrier resin for masterbatches. Polym Polym Compos2003; 11: 91–100.
26.
WacharawichanantSHoysangPRatchawongS. Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of poly(lactic acid)/ethylene-butyl acrylate copolymer nanocomposites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2017; 223: 1–10.
27.
DanielDJPanneerselvamK. Abrasive wear of polypropylene/Cloisite 30B/Elvaloy AC 3427 nanocomposites. J Compos Mater2018; 52: 1833–1843.
28.
DanielDJPanneerselvamK. Mechanical and thermal behaviour of polypropylene/Cloisite 30B/Elvaloy AC 3427 nanocomposites processed by melt intercalation method. Trans Indian Inst Met2017; 70: 1131–1138.
29.
Turner-JonesAAizlewoodJMBeckettDR. Crystalline forms of isotactic polypropylene. Makromol Chem1964; 75: 134–158.
30.
DevarajuAPerumalAEAlphonsaJet al.Sliding wear behavior of plasma nitrided austenitic stainless steel type AISI 316LN in the temperature range from 25 to 400℃ at 10−4 bar. Wear2012; 288: 17–26.
31.
LiuTWoodWLiBet al.Effect of reinforcement on wear debris of carbon nanofiber/high density polyethylene composites: morphological study and quantitative analysis. Wear2012; 294–295: 326–335.
32.
PrasadBK. Sliding wear behaviour of bronzes under varying material composition, microstructure and test conditions. Wear2004; 257: 110–123.
33.
ZhangLCZarudiIXiaoKQ. Novel behaviour of friction and wear of epoxy composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes. Wear2006; 261: 806–811.
34.
LuoGLiWLiangWet al.Coupling effects of glass fiber treatment and matrix modification on the interfacial microstructures and the enhanced mechanical properties of glass fiber/polypropylene composites. Compos Part B Eng2017; 111: 190–199.
35.
AbdouJPReynoldsKJPfauMRet al.Interfacial crystallization of isotactic polypropylene surrounding macroscopic carbon nanotube and graphene fibers. Polymer2016; 91: 136–145.
36.
HanRNieMWangQ. Control over β-form hybrid shish-kebab crystals in polypropylene pipe via coupled effect of self-assembly β nucleating agent and rotation extrusion. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2015; 52: 158–164.
37.
HuangJXuCWuDet al.Transcrystallization of polypropylene in the presence of polyester/cellulose nanocrystal composite fibers. Carbohydr Polym2017; 167: 105–114.
38.
IdumahCIHassanA. Characterization and preparation of conductive exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets kenaf fibre hybrid polypropylene composites. Synth Met2016; 212: 91–104.
39.
BajsićEGŠmitILeskovacM. Blends of thermoplastic polyurethane and polypropylene. I. Mechanical and phase behavior. J Appl Polym Sci2007; 104: 3980–3985.
40.
JiaSZhuYWangZet al.Influences of PP-g-MA on the surface free energy, morphologies and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/polypropylene blends. J Polym Res2015; 22: 1–10.
41.
G'sellCJonasJJ. Determination of the plastic behaviour of solid polymers at constant true strain rate. J Mater Sci1979; 14: 583–591.
42.
XuYDelgadoPToddADet al.Lightweight micro-cellular plastics from polylactide/polyolefin hybrids. Polymer2016; 102: 73–83.
43.
SavasLATayfunUDoganM. The use of polyethylene copolymers as compatibilizers in carbon fiber reinforced high density polyethylene composites. Compos Part B Eng2016; 99: 188–195.
44.
BajsićEGRekVDynamic mechanical study of thermoplastic polyurethane/polypropylene blends. In: AgarwalSGreinerA (eds). e-Polymers, Germany: De Gruyter, 2004, pp. 837–846.
45.
MyshkinNKPetrokovetsMIKovalevAV. Tribology of polymers: adhesion, friction, wear, and mass-transfer. Tribol Int2005; 38: 910–921.
46.
MathewMTNovoJRochaLAet al.Tribological, rheological and mechanical characterization of polymer blends for ropes and nets. Tribol Int2010; 43: 1400–1409.
47.
Da SilvaRCLDa SilvaCHMedeirosJTN. Is there delamination wear in polyurethane?Wear2007; 263: 974–983.
48.
ShalwanAYousifBF. In state of art: mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Design2013; 48: 14–24.
