Test procedures for characterizing the orthotropic behavior of a unidirectional composite at room temperature and quasi-static loading conditions are developed and discussed. The resulting data consisting of 12 stress–strain curves and associated material parameters are used in a newly developed material model—an orthotropic elasto-plastic constitutive model that is driven by tabulated stress–strain curves and other material properties that allow for the elastic and inelastic deformation model to be combined with damage and failure models. A unidirectional composite—T800/F3900, commonly used in the aerospace industry, is used to illustrate how the experimental procedures are developed and used. The generated data are then used to model a dynamic impact test. Results show that the developed framework implemented into a special version of LS-DYNA yields reasonably accurate predictions of the structural behavior.
ChangFKChangKY. Post-failure analysis of bolted composite joints in tension of shear-out mode failure. J Compos Mater1987; 21: 809–833.
3.
ChangFKChangKY. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentration. J Compos Mater1987; 21: 834–855.
4.
Yen CF. Ballistic impact modeling of composite materials. In: Proceedings of 7th international LS-DYNA users conference, Detroit, MI, 19–21 May 2002, pp.6-15–6-26.
5.
ForghaniAZobeiryNPoursartipAet al.A structural modelling framework for prediction of damage development and failure of composite laminates. J Compos Mater2013; 47: 2553–2573.
6.
PinhoSTIannuciLRobinsonP. Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fiber kinking. Part II: FE implementation. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 766–777.
7.
MaimiPCamanhoPPMayugoJAet al.A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part I – Constitutive model. Mech Mater2007; 39: 897–908.
Adams DO, Moriarty JM, Gallegos AM, et al. Development and evaluation of the V-notched rail shear test for composite laminates. FAA Technical Report DOT/FAA/AR-03/63, Office of Aviation Research, Washington DC, 2003.
10.
WaasAMSchultheiszCR. Compressive failure of composites, Part I. Progr Aerosp Sci1996; 32: 1–42.
11.
WaasAMSchultheiszCR. Compressive failure of composites, Part II. Progr Aerosp Sci1996; 32: 43–78.
12.
KachanovLM. Separation failure of composite materials. Polym Mech1976; 6: 812–815.
13.
LuoQTongT. Energy release rates for interlaminar delamination in laminates considering transverse shear effects. Compos Struct2008; 89: 235–244.
14.
WilkinsDJEisenmannJRCaminRAet al.Characterizing delamination growth in graphite – epoxy. Damage Compos Mater ASTM STP 7751982, pp. 168–183.
15.
GonzalezCLlorcaJ. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2795–2806.
16.
Broughton WR and Sims GD. An overview of through-thickness test methods for polymer matrix composites. NLP Report DMM(A)148, National Physical Laboratory, UK, 2001.
17.
BroughtonWRKumosaMHullD. Analysis of the Iosipescu shear test as applied to unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol1989; 38: 299–325.
18.
FergusonRFHintonMJHileyMJ. Determining the through-thickness properties of FRP materials. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1411–1420.
19.
ASTM D 3846/D20.18-08(2015). Standard test method for in-plane shear strength of reinforced plastics.
20.
WalrathDEAdamsDF. The Iosipescu shear test as applied to composite materials. Exp Mech1983; 23: 105–110.
21.
MelinLNNeumeisterJM. Measuring constitutive shear behavior of orthotropic composites and evaluation of the modified Iosipescu test. Compos Struct2006; 76: 106–115.
22.
HawongJSShinDCBaekUC. Validation of pure shear test device using finite element method and experimental methods. Eng Fract Mech2003; 71: 233–243.
23.
Neumeister JM and Melin LN. A modified Iosipescu shear test for anisotropic composite panels. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on composite materials (ICCM/14), San Diego, CA, 14–18 July 2003.
24.
OdegardGKumosaM. Determination of shear strength of unidirectional composite materials with the Iosipescu and 10 degree off-axis shear tests. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 2917–2943.
25.
PierronFVautrinA. Measurement of the in-plane shear strengths of unidirectional composites with the Iosipescu test. Compos Sci Technol1997; 57: 1653–1660.
26.
SwansonSRMessickMToombesGR. Comparison of torsion tube and Iosipescu in-plane shear test results for a carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composite. Composites1997; 16: 220–224.
27.
ASTM D 4255/D4255M-15a. Standard test method for in-plane shear properties of polymer matrix composite materials by the Rail Shear Method.
28.
HussainAKAdamsDF. Analytical evaluation of the two-rail shear test method for composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 221–238.
29.
GoldbergRKCarneyKSDuBoisPet al.Development of an orthotropic elasto-plastic generalized composite material model suitable for impact problems. ASCE J Aerosp Eng2016; 29. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000580.
30.
Hoffarth C. A generalized orthotropic elasto-plastic material model for impact analysis. PhD Thesis, School of Sustainable Engineering & the Built Environment, Arizona State University, 2016.
31.
HoffarthCRajanSDGoldbergRet al.Implementation and validation of a three-dimensional plasticity-based deformation model for orthotropic composites. Composites A2016; 91: 336–350.
32.
Tsai, S.W. and Wu, E.M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J of Composite Materials 1971; 5: 58–80.
33.
HarringtonJHoffarthCRajanSDet al.Using virtual tests to complete the description of a three-dimensional orthotropic material. ASCE J Aerosp Eng2017; 30. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000737.
