Laminated fiber reinforced polymer composites are known for high specific strength and stiffness in the plane of lamination, yet relatively low out-of-plane impact damage tolerance due to matrix dominated interlaminar mechanical properties. A number of factors including the toughness of the matrix can influence the response of composites to impact. The objective of the current investigation is to evaluate the ballistic impact response of carbon/epoxy tubes with variable amounts of nanosilica particles added to the matrix as a toughening agent. Mass density, elastic modulus, glass transition temperature and Mode I fracture toughness of the matrix materials were measured. Tubes manufactured with these matrix materials were ballistically impacted using a round steel projectile aimed at normal incidence across the major diameter. After impact, the tubes were nondestructively inspected and subjected to mechanical tests to determine the residual shear strength in torsion. Increasing concentrations of nanosilica monotonically increased the modulus and fracture toughness of the matrix materials. Tubes with nanosilica had smaller impact damage area, higher residual shear strength, and higher energy absorbed per unit damage area versus control materials with no nanosilica. Overall, the addition of nanosilica improved the impact damage resistance and tolerance of carbon/epoxy tubes loaded in torsion, with minimal adverse effects on mass density and glass transition temperature.
CantwellWJMortonJ. The impact resistance of composite materials—a review. Composites1991; 22: 347–362.
3.
HusmanGEWhitneyJMHalpinJCResidual strength characterization of laminated composites subjected to impact loading. In: GreszczukL (ed). Foreign object impact damage to composites, West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1975, pp. 92–113.
4.
Guynn EG and O'Brien TK. The influence of lay-up and thickness on composite impact damage and compression strength. In: 26th AIAA structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Orlando, FL, 15–17 April 1985, pp.187–196. Reston, VA: AIAA.
5.
CantwellWJMortonJ. Comparison of the low and high velocity impact response of CFRP. Composites1989; 20: 545–551.
6.
CantwellWJMortonJ. The influence of varying projectile mass on the impact response of CFRP. Compos Struct1989; 13: 101–114.
7.
PrichardJCHoggPJ. The role of impact damage in post-impact compression testing. Composites1990; 21: 503–511.
8.
KistlerLSWaasAM. On the response of curved laminated panels subjected to transverse impact loads. Int J Solids Struct1999; 36: 1311–1327.
9.
Minguet P. Damage tolerance evaluation of new manufacturing techniques for composite helicopter drive shafts. In: 34th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, La Jolla, CA, 19–22 April 1993, pp.867–876. Reston, VA: AIAA.
10.
MinakGAbrateSGhelliDet al.Residual torsional strength after impact of CFRP tubes. Compos Part B: Eng2010; 41: 637–645.
11.
DenizMEKarakuzuRSariMet al.On the residual compressive strength of the glass-epoxy tubes subjected to transverse impact loading. J Compos Mater2012; 46: 737–745.
GreenhalghEHileyM. The assessment of novel materials and processes for the impact tolerant design of stiffened composite aerospace structures. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2003; 34: 151–161.
14.
NashNHYoungTMMcGrailPTet al.Inclusion of a thermoplastic phase to improve impact and post-impact performances of carbon fibre reinforced thermosetting composites—a review. Mater Des2015; 85: 582–597.
15.
TangYYeLZhangZet al.Interlaminar fracture toughness and CAI strength of fibre-reinforced composites with nanoparticles – a review. Compos Sci Technol2013; 86: 26–37.
16.
HussainF. Review article: Polymer-matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: an overview. J Compos Mater2006; 40: 1511–1575.
17.
JohnsenBBKinlochAJMohammedRDet al.Toughening mechanisms of nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers. Polymer2007; 48: 530–541.
18.
Hackett SC, Nelson JM, Hine AM, et al. Improved carbon fiber composite compression strength and shear stiffness through matrix modification with nanosilica. In: 25th technical conference of the American Society For Composites and 14th US-Japan conference on composite materials 2010, Dayton, Ohio, 20–22 September 2010, pp.694–710. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
19.
Hackett SC, Nelson JM, Hine AM, et al. The effect of nanosilica concentration on the enhancement of epoxy matrix resins for prepreg composites resin flow. In: Proceedings Of Society For The Advancement Of Materials And Process Engineering, SAMPE 2010, Seattle, WA, 17–20 May 2010, pp.11–14. Diamond Bar, CA: SAMPE.
20.
Nelson JM, Hackett SC, Hine AM, et al. Development of nanosilica-epoxy matrix resins for high temperature prepreg composites. In: Proceedings Of Society For The Advancement Of Materials And Process Engineering. Long Beach, CA, 23–26 May, 2011, pp.23–26. Diamond Bar, CA: SAMPE.
21.
TangYYeLZhangDet al.Characterization of transverse tensile, interlaminar shear and interlaminate fracture in CF/EP laminates with 10 wt% and 20 wt% silica nanoparticles in matrix resins. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1943–1950.
22.
NelsonJMSharmaAGoetzDPet al.Nanosilica-modified epoxy resins for use in filament-wound drive shaft applications. In: The composites and advanced materials expo (CAMX) 2014. Orlando, FL, 13–16 October 2014. Diamond Bar, CA: SAMPE.
23.
PandyaKSAkellaKJoshiMet al.Ballistic impact behavior of carbon nanotube and nanosilica dispersed resin and composites. J Appl Phys2012; 112: 113522.
24.
KühnAMahrholzTMoschJ. Matrix optimization of CFRP parts concerning fire and impact properties with process acceleration. CEAS Aeronaut J2013; 4: 191–201.
25.
LandowskiMStrugałaGBudzikMet al.Impact damage in SiO2 nanoparticle enhanced epoxy – carbon fibre composites. Compos Part B: Eng2017; 113: 91–99.
26.
Wang ML, McAninch IM and La Scala JJ. Materials characterization of high-temperature epoxy resins: SC-79 and SC-15/SC-79 blend. Report No. ARL-TR-5484. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
ASTM D792-13. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2013, pp.1–6.
29.
ASTM D5045-14. Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2014, pp.1–10.
30.
Melis ME, Pereira M, Revilock D, et al. A summary of the NASA Glenn ballistic impact lab contributions to the Columbia accident investigation. In: Annual reliability and maintainability symposium, 24–27 January 2005, Alexandria, VA, pp.284–290. Reston, VA: AIAA.
31.
López-PuenteJZaeraRNavarroC. Experimental and numerical analysis of normal and oblique ballistic impacts on thin carbon/epoxy woven laminates. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 374–387.
32.
Sollenberger SG, Bail JL, Kohlman L, et al. Ballistic impact tolerance of filament-wound composite tubes with rigid and flexible matrix materials. In: 25th Technical conference of the American Society For Composites and 14th US-Japan conference on composite materials 2010. Dayton, Ohio, 20–22 September 2010, pp.1401–1412. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
Nelson JM, Hackett SC, Hine AM, et al. Development of nanosilica-epoxy matrix resins for high temperature prepreg composites. In: POLY division, 242nd American Chemical Society national meeting, Denver, CO, 28 August–1 September 2011. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
36.
SunYZhangZMoonK-Set al.Glass transition and relaxation behavior of epoxy nanocomposites. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys2004; 42: 3849–3858.
PethrickRAMillerCRhoneyI. Influence of nanosilica particles on the cure and physical properties of an epoxy thermoset resin. Polym Int2010; 59: 236–241.
