A woven fabric’s compaction in the vacuum infusion process is characterized by applying an initial settling under a minor load, compaction, settling under a major load, decompaction and relaxation. The effects of compaction rate, relaxation pressure, wetting and debulking cycles are all investigated. Although wetting helps by increasing fiber volume fraction insignificantly, its contribution is more significant during debulking cycles by increasing the fiber volume fraction to 57.4% as compared to 55.4% for the debulked dry specimens. Recovery during decompaction is much less than the deformation during compaction, and thinning/thickening of the specimens with time under constant pressure, so called settling/relaxation pressures, indicates that fabric specimens are not elastic materials, but viscoelastic. The experimental data of this study will be valuable to compare different viscoelastic and elastic compaction models in our next study.
BickertonSBuntainMJSomashekarAA. The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding preforms. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2003; 34: 431–444.
2.
SomashekarAABickertonSBhattacharyyaD. Exploring the non-elastic compression deformation of dry glass fibre reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 183–200.
3.
SajnDGersakJFlajsR. Prediction of stress relaxation of fabrics with increased elasticity. Text Res J2006; 76: 742–750.
4.
ChenBChengAHDChouT-W. A nonlinear compaction model for fibrous preforms. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 701–707.
5.
KimYRMcCarthySPFanucciJP. Compressibility and relaxation of fiber reinforcements during composite processing. Polym Compos1991; 12: 13–19.
6.
YenilmezBSenanMSozerEM. Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1710–1719.
7.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process, A: characterization experiments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 499–510.
8.
YangJXiaoJZengJ. Compaction behavior and part thickness variation in vacuum infusion molding process. Appl Compos Mater2011; 19: 443–458.
9.
TackittKWalshSM. Experimental study of thickness gradient formation in the VARTM process. Mater Manuf Process2005; 20: 607–627.
10.
LuoYVerpoestI. Compressibility and relaxation of a new sandwich textile preform for liquid composite molding. Polym Compos1999; 20: 179–191.
11.
ParnasRSWalshSM. Vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding model. Polym Compos2005; 26: 477–485.
12.
HubertPPoursartipA. A method for the direct measurement of the fibre bed compaction curve of composite prepregs. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 179–187.
13.
LiW. Process and performance evaluation of the vacuum-assisted process. J Compos Mater2004; 38: 1803–1814.
14.
GovignonQBickertonSMorrisJ. Full field monitoring of the resin flow and laminate properties during the resin infusion process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 1412–1426.
15.
AnderssonHMLundströmTSGebartBR. Application of digital speckle photography to measure thickness variations in the vacuum infusion process. Polym Compos2003; 24: 448–455.
16.
LiJZhangCLiangR. Modeling and analysis of thickness gradient and variations in vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. Polym Compos2008; 29: 473–482.
17.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. I: Review of experimental results. Polym Compos1998; 19: 198–216.
18.
SomashekarAABickertonSBhattacharyyaD. Modelling the viscoelastic stress relaxation of glass fibre reinforcements under constant compaction strain during composites manufacturing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2012; 43: 1044–1052.
19.
ModiDJohnsonMLongA. Analysis of pressure profile and flow progression in the vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1458–1464.
20.
CorreiaNRobitailleFLongAC. Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36: 1645–1656.
21.
HammamiAGebartBR. Analysis of the vacuum infusion molding process. Polym Compos2000; 21: 28–40.
22.
KellyPAUmerRBickertonS. Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 868–873.
23.
BinétruyCKrawczakPComas-CardonaS. Unidirectional compression of fibre reinforcements. Part 1: a non-linear elastic-plastic behaviour. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 507–514.
24.
SaundersRALekakouCBaderMG. Compression in the processing of polymer composites 1. A mechanical and microstructural study for different glass fabrics and resins. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 983–993.
25.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process: (a) use of characterization database in a model and (b) experiments. J Compos Mater2012; 47: 1959–1975.
26.
GovignonQBickertonSKellyPA. Simulation of the reinforcement compaction and resin flow during the complete resin infusion process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 45–57.
27.
YuexinDZhaoyuanTYanZ. Compression responses of preform in vacuum infusion process. Chinese J Aeronaut2008; 21: 370–377.
28.
YenilmezBAkyolTCaglarB. Minimizing thickness variation in the Vacuum Infusion (VI) process. Adv Compos Lett2011; 20: 157–167.
29.
Grimsley BW, Song X, Hubert P, et al. Flow and compaction during the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. In: International SAMPE technical conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 5–8 November 2001, pp.140–153.
30.
YenilmezBCaglarBSozerEM. Viscoelastic modeling of fiber preform compaction in Vacuum Infusion process. J Compos Mater2016; (submitted).
