Present work demonstrates the complete numerical modeling and experimental validation of transient incompressible two-phase flow during vacuum infusion (VI) in the presence and absence of high permeability media (HPM) considering gravity effects. Coupled flow modeling based on continuity equations, Darcy’s law for porous media flow, including gravity effects with level set front tracking algorithm, has been developed on the multiblock-structured grid with higher-order finite-difference framework to predict the spatio-temporal preform saturation during infusion with/without HPM on the complex mold configurations. The model-predicted instantaneous change in pressure, thickness elevation, fill time, flow front positions, and influence of gravity have been validated with experiments for horizontal and vertical flat plates using pressure sensors and digital cameras. For the first time, the complete modeling and experimentation of transient VI in the presence or absence of HPM, including gravity, shows the ability to predict realistic preform saturation during VI in different mold geometry.
CastroJMacoskoC. Studies of mold filling and curing in the reaction injection molding process. AIChE J1982; 28(2): 250–260.
2.
HindersmannA. Confusion about infusion: an overview of infusion processes. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2019; 126: 105583.
3.
Van OosteromSAllenTBattleyM, et al.An objective comparison of common vacuum assisted resin infusion processes. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2019; 125: 105528.
4.
AdhikariDGururajaSHemchandraS. Resin infusion in porous preform in the presence of HPM during VARTM: flow simulation using level set and experimental validation. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2021; 151: 106641.
5.
AdhikariDGururajaSHemchandraS. Vacuum infusion in porous preform with different mould configurations: flow simulation and experimental validation. J Reinforced Plastics Composites2021; 40(7-8): 321–338.
6.
CorreiaNRobitailleFLongA, et al.Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. analytical formulation. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2005; 36(12): 1645–1656.
7.
VilaJGonzalezCLlorcaJ. A level set approach for the analysis of flow and compaction during resin infusion in composite materials. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2014; 67: 299–307.
8.
ZenoneCILe GrognecPParkCH. Characterization and modeling of composite vacuum infusion process: influence of fabric type, resin viscosity and strain rate. IOP Conference Series: Mater Scien Engineer2018; 406: 012062.
9.
YenilmezBCaglarBSozerEM. Pressure controlled compaction characterization of fiber preforms suitable for viscoelastic modeling in the vacuum infusion process. J Compos Mater2017; 51(9): 1209–1224.
10.
RubinoFCarloneP. A semi-analytical model to predict infusion time and reinforcement thickness in VARTM and scrimp processes. Polymers2019; 11(1): 20.
11.
AchesonJASimacekPAdvaniSG. The implications of fiber compaction and saturation on fully coupled vartm simulation. Composites A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2004; 35(2): 159–169.
12.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process, a: characterization experiments. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2009; 40(4): 499–510.
13.
SeemannWH. Plastic transfer molding apparatus for the production of fiber reinforced plastic structures. US Patent1991; 5: 52–906.
14.
TariMImbertJLinM, et al.Analysis of resin transfer molding with high permeability layers. J Manufacturing Sci Eng1998; 120(3): 609–616.
15.
LinMHahnHTHuhH. A finite element simulation of resin transfer molding based on partial nodal saturation and implicit time integration. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing1998; 29(5-6): 541–550.
16.
HsiaoKTMathurRAdvaniS, et al.A closed form solution for flow during the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. J Manufacturing Sci Eng2000; 122(3): 463–475.
17.
YoungWB. A two-layer model for the simulation of the vartm process with resin distribution layer. Appl Compos Mater2013; 20(6): 1305–1319.
18.
LoudadRSaouabABeaucheneP, et al.Numerical modeling of vacuum assisted resin transfer molding using multilayer approach. J Compos Mater2017; 51(24): 3441–3452.
19.
VilaJGonzalezCLLorcaJ. Fabric compaction and infiltration during vacuum-assisted resin infusion with and without distribution medium. J Compos Mater2017; 51(5): 687–703.
20.
AdhikariDGururajaS. Transient analysis of in plane and through thickness flow during VARTM in the presence of HPM. 2014; DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2014-37628
21.
LiC. Numerical and experimental study on the gravitation and surface tension effects on flow injection in center-gated disks. J Mater Process Techn2003; 140(1–3): 167–172.
22.
YoonMKBaidooJGillespieJWJr, et al.Vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process incorporating gravitational effects: a closed-form solution. J Compos Mater2005; 39(24): 2227–2242.
23.
BruschkeMAdvaniSG. A finite element/control volume approach to mold filling in anisotropic porous media. Polym Composites1990; 11(6): 398–405.
24.
KangMLeeWHahnH. Analysis of vacuum bag resin transfer molding process. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2001; 32(11): 1553–1560.
25.
GrujicicMChittajalluKWalshS). Non isothermal preform infiltration during the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. Appl Surf Sci2005; 245(1–4): 51–64.
26.
DongCJ. Development of a process model for the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding simulation by the response surface method. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2006; 37(9): 1316–1324.
27.
SimacekPAdvaniSG. Role of acceleration forces in numerical simulation of mold filling processes in fibrous porous media. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2006; 37(11): 1970–1982.
28.
WangCBaiGYueG, et al.Optimization of resin infusion processing for composite pipe key-part and K/T type joints using vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Appl Compos Mater2016; 23(5): 1065–1078.
29.
HanciogluMSozerEMAdvaniSG. Comparison of in-plane resin transfer molding and vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding ‘effective’ permeabilities based on mold filling experiments and simulations. J Reinforced Plastics Composites2020; 39(1-2): 31–44.
30.
AnderssonHLundstromTLanghansN. Computational fluid dynamics applied to the vacuum infusion process. Polym Composites2005; 26(2): 231–239.
31.
YangBJinTBiF, et al.Modeling the resin flow and numerical simulation of the filling stage for vacuum assisted resin infusion process. J Reinforced Plastics Composites2014; 33(21): 1976–1992.
32.
SimacekPAdvaniSG. Resin flow modeling in compliant porous media: an efficient approach for liquid composite molding. Int J Mater Forming2018; 11(4): 503–515.
33.
HemchandraSLieuwenT. Local consumption speed of turbulent premixed flames an analysis of ‘memory effects’. Combustion and Flame2010; 157(5): 955–965.
34.
CaglarBHanciogluMSozerEM. Monitoring and modeling of part thickness evolution in vacuum infusion process. J Compos Mater2021; 55(8): 1053–1072.
35.
SalvatoriDCaglarBTeixidoH, et al.Permeability and capillary effects in a channel-wise non-crimp fabric. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2018; 108: 41–52.
36.
AdhikariD) Resin Flow in Porous Preform During VARTM: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation. PhD Thesis. Bengaluru, India: Indian Institute of Science, 2019.
37.
WeitzenbockJShenoiRWilsonP. Measurement of principal permeability with the channel flow experiment. Polym Composites1999; 20(2): 321–335.
38.
Di FrattaCKoutsoukisGKlunkerF, et al.Characterization of anisotropic permeability from flow front angle measurements. Polym Composites2016; 37(7): 2037–2052.
39.
ZarandiMAFArroyoSPillaiKM. Longitudinal and transverse flows in fiber tows: evaluation of theoretical permeability models through numerical predictions and experimental measurements. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2019; 119: 73–87.
40.
RaizadaAPillaiKM. Erratum to “measurement of principal permeability with the channel flow experiment”. Polym Composites2021; 42(12): 6952–6954.
41.
CaglarBTekinCKarasuF, et al.Assessment of capillary phenomena in liquid composite molding. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2019; 120: 73–83.
42.
GodboleMGGururajaSJoshiM, et al.Semi-analytical formulation of effective permeability of a dual scale unidirectional fabric. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2021; 150: 106630.
43.
VerreyJMichaudVMansonJA. Dynamic capillary effects in liquid composite moulding with non-crimp fabrics. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2006; 37(1): 92–102.
44.
LeclercJSRuizE. Porosity reduction using optimized flow velocity in resin transfer molding. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2008; 39(12): 1859–1868.
45.
GutowskiTGMorigakiTCaiZ. The consolidation of laminate composites. J Compos Mater1987; 21(2): 172–188.
46.
MatuzakiRSetoDNaitoM, et al.Analytical prediction of void formation in geometrically anisotropic woven fabrics during resin transfer molding. Composites Sci Technology2015; 107: 154–161.
47.
GueroultSLebel-LavacryAParkCH, et al.Analytical modeling and in situ measurement of void formation in liquid composite molding processes. Adv Compos Mater2014; 23(1): 31–42.
48.
YeagerMSimacekPAdvaniSG. Role of fiber distribution and air evacuation time on capillary driven flow into fiber tows. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2017; 93: 144–152.
49.
WangYGroveS. Modelling microscopic flow in woven fabric reinforcements and its application in dual-scale resin infusion modelling. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2008; 39(5): 843–855.
50.
SimacekPAdvaniSG. Permeability model for a woven fabric. Polym Composites1996; 17(6): 887–899.
51.
BinetruyCHilaireBPabiotJ. Tow impregnation model and void formation mechanisms during RTM. J Compos Mater1998; 32(3): 223–245.
52.
PucciMFLiotierPJDrapierS. Capillary wicking in a fibrous reinforcement–orthotropic issues to determine the capillary pressure components. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing2015; 77: 133–141.
53.
PatinoIDNieto-LondonoC. Boundary element techniques for multiscale filling simulations in dual-scale fibrous reinforcements using two lumped approaches. Comput Mech2021; 68(6): 1223–1266.
54.
VoHPucciMFDrapierS, et al.Capillary pressure contribution in fabrics as a function of fibre volume fraction for liquid composite moulding processes. Colloids Surf A: Physicochemical Eng Aspects2022; 635: 128120.
55.
OsherSSethianJA. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on hamilton-jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys1988; 79(1): 12–49.
56.
SussmanMSmerekaPOsherS. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J Comput Physics1994; 114(1): 146–159.
57.
OsherSFedkiwR. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006, pp. 153.
58.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. I: review of experimental results. Polym Composites1998; 19(2): 198–216.
59.
LaiYHKhomamiBKardosJL. Accurate permeability characterization of preforms used in polymer matrix composite fabrication processes. Polym Composites1997; 18(3): 368–377.
60.
MoinP. Fundamentals of Engineering Numerical Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
61.
AdhikariDGururajaS. Characterization of permeability and compaction behavior for different fiber layups during VARTM. In: Proceedings of the ICCMS – International Conference on Composite Materials and Structures, Hyderabad, India, December 2017. Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, pp. ID–380.
62.
LawrenceJMSimacekPFreyP, et al.The compaction behavior of fibrous preform materials during the VARTM infusion. AIP Conference Proceedings2007; 907(1): 1039–1045.
63.
ArulappanCDuraisamyAAdhikariD, et al.Investigations on pressure and thickness profiles in carbon fiber-reinforced polymers during vacuum assisted resin transfer molding. J Reinforced Plastics Composites2015; 34(1): 3–18.
64.
AktasAKrishnanLKandolaB, et al.A cure modelling study of an unsaturated polyester resin system for the simulation of curing of fibre-reinforced composites during the vacuum infusion process. J Compos Mater2015; 49(20): 2529–2540.
65.
BogettiTAGillespieJWJr. Process-induced stress and deformation in thick-section thermoset composite laminates. J Compos Mater1992; 26(5): 626–660.
66.
PothnisJ. Electric Field-Guided Alignment of Carbon Nanotubes in Polymer Matrix Composites for Structural Applications. PhD Thesis. Bengaluru, India: Indian Institute of Science, 2021.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
