This paper presents a micromechanical analysis of the influence of fiber–matrix interface fracture properties on the transverse tensile response of fiber-reinforced composite. The method combines three-dimensional (3D) computational micromechanics and augmented finite element method to provide high-fidelity results of damage initiation and propagation. Random arrangement of fibers and normal distribution of interface toughness and strength are considered in representative volume elements to capture the stochastic behavior of the composite under loading. Sensitivity analysis with respect to the interface properties distribution, and shape and size of fibers on the representative volume element’s strength are performed. The effect of fiber volume fractions on the strength and elastic modulus of the composite is investigated. Failure path in different representative volume elements are compared. The results show that the response of a representative volume element with identical interface properties overestimates the composite’s transverse strength. It is also shown that the damage initiation and propagation locations are affected by the distributions of fracture properties, and the shape and size of fibers within the representative volume element.
ShaJDaiJLiJet al.Measurement and analysis of fiber–matrix interface strength of carbon fiber-reinforced phenolic resin matrix composites. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 1303–1311.
2.
ShangY-BShiH-J. Micromechanical analysis of stochastic fiber/matrix interface strength effect on transverse tensile property of fiber reinforced composites. J Reinf Plastic Compos2014; 34: 131–144. .
3.
MerodioJOgdenR. Mechanical response of fiber-reinforced incompressible non-linearly elastic solids. Int J Non-Linear Mech2005; 40: 213–227.
4.
QiuGPenceT. Remarks on the behavior of simple directionally reinforced incompressible nonlinearly elastic solids. J Elast1997; 49: 1–30.
5.
CastañedaPPTiberioE. A second-order homogenization method in finite elasticity and applications to black-filled elastomers. J Mech Phys Solid2000; 48: 1389–1411.
6.
AgorasMLopez-PamiesOCastañedaPP. A general hyperelastic model for incompressible fiber-reinforced elastomers. J Mech Phys Solid2009; 57: 268–286.
7.
Lopez-PamiesOCastañedaPP. On the overall behavior, microstructure evolution, and macroscopic stability in reinforced rubbers at large deformations: I—Theory. J Mech Phys Solid2006; 54: 807–830.
8.
FoliasE. On the prediction of failure at a fiber/matrix interface in a composite subjected to a transverse tensile load. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 869–886.
9.
KingTBlackketterDWalrathDet al.Micromechanics prediction of the shear strength of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites: the influence of the matrix and interface strengths. J Compos Mater1992; 26: 558–573.
10.
Van den HeuvelPWubboltsMYoungRet al.Failure phenomena in two-dimensional multi-fibre model composites: 5. a finite element study. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf1998; 29: 1121–1135.
11.
FiedlerBHojoMOchiaiSet al.Finite-element modeling of initial matrix failure in CFRP under static transverse tensile load. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 95–105.
12.
HayesSLaneRJonesF. Fibre/matrix stress transfer through a discrete interphase. Part 1: single-fibre model composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 379–389.
13.
HobbiebrunkenTHojoMAdachiTet al.Evaluation of interfacial strength in CF/epoxies using FEM and in-situ experiments. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 2248–2256.
14.
LaneRHayesSJonesF. Fibre/matrix stress transfer through a discrete interphase: 2. High volume fraction systems. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 565–578.
15.
ZhangYXiaZ. Micromechanical analysis of interphase damage for fiber reinforced composite laminates. CMC-Tech Sci Press2005; 2: 213–213.
16.
ZhangYXiaZEllyinF. Nonlinear viscoelastic micromechanical analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer laminates with damage evolution. Int J Solids Struct2005; 42: 591–604.
17.
MalignoAWarriorNLongA. Effects of interphase material properties in unidirectional fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 36–44.
18.
O’DwyerDO’DowdNMcCarthyC. Micromechanical investigation of damage processes at composite-adhesive interfaces. Compos Sci Technol2013; 86: 61–69.
19.
O’DwyerDO’DowdNMcCarthyC. Numerical micromechanical investigation of interfacial strength parameters in a carbon fibre composite material. J Compos Mater2013; 48: 749–760. .
20.
YangLWuZCaoYet al.Micromechanical modelling and simulation of unidirectional fibre-reinforced composite under shear loading. J Reinf Plastic Compos2014; 34: 72–83. .
21.
YangLYanYLiuYet al.Microscopic failure mechanisms of fiber-reinforced polymer composites under transverse tension and compression. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1818–1825.
22.
VaughanTMcCarthyC. Micromechanical modelling of the transverse damage behaviour in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 388–396.
23.
VaughanTMcCarthyC. A micromechanical study on the effect of intra-ply properties on transverse shear fracture in fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1217–1228.
24.
GonzálezCLLorcaJ. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2795–2806.
25.
GonzálezCSeguradoJLLorcaJ. Numerical simulation of elasto-plastic deformation of composites: evolution of stress microfields and implications for homogenization models. J Mech Phys Solid2004; 52: 1573–1593.
26.
MoraledaJSeguradoJLlorcaJ. Effect of interface fracture on the tensile deformation of fiber-reinforced elastomers. Int J Solid Struct2009; 46: 4287–4297.
27.
MishnaevskyLBrøndstedP. Micromechanical modeling of damage and fracture of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites: a review. Computat Mater Sci2009; 44: 1351–1359.
28.
BayatMAghdamM. A micromechanics based analysis of hollow fiber composites using DQEM. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43: 2921–2929.
29.
SabistonTMohammadiMCherkaouiMet al.Micromechanics for a long fibre reinforced composite model with a functionally graded interphase. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 84: 188–199.
30.
SabistonTMohammadiMCherkaouiMet al.Micromechanics based elasto-visco-plastic response of long fibre composites using functionally graded interphases at quasi-static and moderate strain rates. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 100: 31–43.
31.
HuangYJinKKHaSK. Effects of fiber arrangement on mechanical behavior of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater2008; 42: 1851–1871.
32.
OhJHJinKKHaSK. Interfacial strain distribution of a unidirectional composite with randomly distributed fibers under transverse loading. J Compos Mater2006; 40: 759–778.
33.
JinKKOhJHHaSK. Effect of fiber arrangement on residual thermal stress distributions in a unidirectional composite. J Compos Mater2007; 41: 591–611.
34.
JinK-KHuangYLeeY-Het al.Distribution of micro stresses and interfacial tractions in unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater2008; 42: 1825–1849.
35.
HojoMMizunoMHobbiebrunkenTet al.Effect of fiber array irregularities on microscopic interfacial normal stress states of transversely loaded UD-CFRP from viewpoint of failure initiation. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1726–1734.
36.
HuangYXuLHaSK. Prediction of three-dimensional composite laminate response using micromechanics of failure. J Compos Mater2012; 46: 2431–2442.
37.
HaSKHuangYHanHHet al.Micromechanics of failure for ultimate strength predictions of composite laminates. J Compos Mater2010; 44: 2347–2361.
38.
HaSKJinKKHuangY. Micro-mechanics of failure (MMF) for continuous fiber reinforced composites. J Compos Mater2008; 42: 1873–1895.
39.
VajariDALegarthBNNiordsonCF. Micromechanical modeling of unidirectional composites with uneven interfacial strengths. Eur J Mech-A/Solid2013; 42: 241–250.
40.
TotryEMolina-AldareguíaJMGonzálezCet al.Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 970–980.
41.
FangXYangQCoxBet al.An augmented cohesive zone element for arbitrary crack coalescence and bifurcation in heterogeneous materials. Int J Numer Meth Eng2011; 88: 841–861.
42.
FangXZhouZCoxBet al.High-fidelity simulations of multiple fracture processes in a laminated composite in tension. J Mech Phys Solid2011; 59: 1355–1373.
43.
LiuWYangQMohammadizadehSet al.An efficient augmented finite element method for arbitrary cracking and crack interaction in solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng2014; 99: 438–468.
44.
LiuWYangQMohammadizadehSet al.An accurate and efficient augmented finite element method for arbitrary crack interactions. J Appl Mech2013; 80: 041033–041033.
45.
NaderiMJungJYangQ. A three dimensional augmented finite element for modeling arbitrary cracking in solids. Int J Fract2016; 197: 147–168.
46.
MoësNBelytschkoT. Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech2002; 69: 813–833.
47.
Dias-da-CostaDAlfaiateJSluysLet al.An embedded formulation with conforming finite elements to capture strong discontinuities. Int J Numer Meth Eng2013; 93: 224–244.
48.
LinderCArmeroF. Finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng2007; 72: 1391–1433.
49.
Dias-da-CostaDAlfaiateJSluysLet al.Towards a generalization of a discrete strong discontinuity approach. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng2009; 198: 3670–3681.
50.
ParkKPaulinoGH. Computational implementation of the PPR potential-based cohesive model in ABAQUS: educational perspective. Eng Fract Mech2012; 93: 239–262.
51.
SpringDWPaulinoGH. A growing library of three-dimensional cohesive elements for use in ABAQUS. Eng Fract Mech2014; 126: 190–216.
52.
LucianoRBarberoE. Formulas for the stiffness of composites with periodic microstructure. Int J Solids Struct1994; 31: 2933–2944.
