This study is concerned with the reactivity between SiC particles and 410L stainless steel alloy. An interval of sintering temperatures (900, 1000, 1100, and 1180℃) was scoped in order to study the temperature influence on the interface reaction under different compaction pressures (400, 800, and 1200 MPa). SiCp/410L SS composites were produced by powder metallurgy. Interface area fraction (%) results and microstructural characterization showed that the interface reaction is strongly dependent on temperature. At 900℃ no reaction SiCp/410L SS was found. At 1000℃ SiCp reacts with 410L SS matrix and with increasing temperature the extent of reaction becomes higher. However, at 1180℃ SiCp dissolves completely leading to specimen deformation. The higher interface area fraction was obtained at a sintering temperature of 1100℃ and a compaction pressure of 1200 MPa. This study presents an advantageous and original combination of materials and process that allows combining compaction pressure and sintering temperature in order to control the interface.
KwokCTLoKHChengFT. Effect of processing conditions on the corrosion performance of laser surface-melted AISI 440C martensitic stainless steel. Surf Coat Tech2003; 166: 221–230.
2.
KrishnaBVBandyopadhyayA. Surface modification of AISI 410 stainless steel using laser engineered net shaping. Mater Des2009; 30: 1490–1496.
3.
AbenojarJVelascoFBautistaA. Atmosphere influence in sintering process of stainless steels matrix composites reinforced with hard particles. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 69–79.
4.
AbenojarJVelascoFTorralbaJM. Reinforcing 316L stainless steel with intermetallic and carbide particles. Mater Sci Eng A2002; 335: 1–5.
5.
PellegJ. Reactions in the matrix and interface of the Fe–SiC metal matrix composite system. Mater Sci Eng A1999; 269: 225–241.
BaconDHEdwardsLMoffattJE. Fatigue and fracture of a 316 stainless steel metal matrix composite reinforced with 25% titanium diboride. Int J Fatigue2013; 48: 39–47.
8.
PatankarSNChandrasejaranTanMJ. Matrix reinforcement interaction in SiC/316L stainless steel composite. J Mater Sci Lett2000; 19: 613–615.
9.
TangWMZhengZXDingHF. Control of the interface between silicon carbide and iron. Mater Chem Phys2003; 80: 360–365.
10.
TongSCMaZY. Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of in situ metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng R2000; 29: 49–113.
11.
PerepezkoJHBassaniMHSParkJS. Diffusional reactions in composite synthesis. Mater Sci Eng A1995; 195: 1–11.
12.
WilliamCHarriganJr. Commercial processing of metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A1998; 244: 75–79.
13.
RahimianMEhsaniNParvinN. The effect of particle size, sintering temperature and sintering time on the properties of Al–Al2O3 composites, made by powder metallurgy. J Mater Process Tech2009; 209: 5387–5393.
14.
TangWMZhengZXDingHF. A study of the solid state reaction between silicon carbide and iron. Mater Chem Phys2002; 74: 258–264.
15.
MajumdarJDKumarALiL. Direct laser cladding of SiC dispersed AISI 316L stainless steel. Tribol Int2009; 42: 750–753.
16.
NardoneVCPrewoKM. On the strength of discontinuous silicon carbide reinforced aluminum composites. Scripta Metall1986; 20: 43–48.
17.
PandaSSSinghVUpadhyayaA. Sintering response of austenitic (316L) and ferritic (434L) stainless steel consolidated in conventional and microwave furnaces. Scripta Mater2006; 54: 2179–2183.
18.
KurganN. Effects of sintering atmosphere on microstructure and mechanical and mechanical property of sintered powder metallurgy 316L stainless steel. Mater Des2013; 52: 995–998.
19.
FangZZ. Sintering of Advanced Materials-Fundamentals and Processes, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2010.
20.
EdreesHJSmithACHendryA. A rule-of-mixtures model for sintering of particle-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. J Eur Ceram Soc1998; 18: 275–278.
21.
CobleR. Sintering crystalline solids. I. Intermediate and final state diffusion models. J Appl Phys1961; 32: 787–792.
22.
AshbyMF. A first report on sintering diagrams. Acta Metall1974; 22: 275–289.
23.
KlarESamalKP. Powder metallurgy stainless steel – processing, microstructures and properties, USA: ASM International, 2007, pp. 71–72.
24.
XiangXHong-chaoSJieC. Effect of sintering pressure and temperature on microstructure and tribological characteristic of Cu-based aircraft brake material. T Non Metal Soc2007; 17: 669–675.
25.
KangSJL. Sintering: Densification, Grain Growth and Microstructure, Amsterdam: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heineman, 2004.
26.
GermanR. Sintering: From Empirical Observations to Scientific Principles, Oxford: Elsevier, 2014.
HattaliMLValetteSRopitalF. Study of SiC–nickel alloy bonding for high temperature applications. J Eur Ceram Soc2009; 29: 813–819.
29.
RuchLSainHRYehHLGirifalcoLA. Analysis and diffusion in ferromagnets. J Phys Chem Sol1976; 37: 649–653.
30.
MehrerHEggersmannMGudeA. Diffusion in intermetallic phases of the Fe–Al and Fe–Si systems. Mater Sci Eng A1997; 240: 889–898.
31.
LiJZongBYWangYM. Experiment and modeling of mechanical properties on iron matrix composites reinforced by different type of ceramic particles. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 7545–7551.
32.
MurthyVSRJenaAKGuptaKP. Structure and Properties of Engineering Materials, New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2003, pp. 155–159.
33.
KalogeropoulouSBaudLEustathopoulosN. Relationship between wettability and reactivity in Fe/SiC system. Acta Metall Mater1995; 43: 907–912. .
34.
ClyneTWWithersPJ. An introduction to metal matrix composites, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
35.
CarpinteriA. Size-scale effects in the failure mechanisms of materials and structures, London: E & FN Spon, 2002.
