The limits and nature of the passive behavior exhibited by modified martensitic stainless steels (MMSS) is studied in brine solutions at different temperatures using electrochemical methods and the point defect model (PDM), in an environment at pH is 3 and temperatures up to 150°C, using autoclaves with CO2 gas up to 2.8 MPa. The results show that passivity on the MMSS is characterized by the metal cation vacancy diffusivity (D) which indicates that the passivity up to temperatures of 75°C is more stable than at higher temperatures up to 150°C. The value of D is used to describe the transition between the passive layers at the threshold temperature of 75°C; at which exhibits the largest stability. MMSS specimens passivated at 75°C exhibit higher passivity stability in experiments performed at 25°C, when compared the pre passivation, suggesting that the change experienced at 75°C is at least partially irreversible.
AI-SiddiqiADaweRA.A review of petroleum engineering aspects of Qatar's oil and gas. Eng J Univ Qatar. 1998; 11: 11–45.
2.
Al-HarthiASMJongJGD.Evaluating the SCC chloride limit for UNS S31603 in sour service. In: CORROSION 2013, paper: 2676. Orlando (FL): NACE International; 2013.
3.
PessuFHuaYBarkerR.An investigation of the overall corrosion behaviour of X65 (UNS K03014) carbon steel in different H2S-CO2-containing environments. In: CORROSION 2016, paper: 7643. Vancouver (CA): NACE International; 2016.
GunaltunYKermaniBSamosirT.Completion tubing optimisation meeting the challenge through prediction and operational experience. In: CORROSION 2011, paper: 11064. Houston (TX): NACE International; 2011.
6.
IkedaAMukaiSUedaM.Corrosion behavior of 9 to 25% Cr steels in wet CO2 environments. Corrosion. 1985; 41 (4): 185–192.
7.
KurahashiHSoneYWadaK.Corrosion and stress corrosion behavior of 13Cr martensitic stainless steels in CO2–H2S–Cl environment. Kawasaki Steel Giho. 1985; 17 (3): 299–305.
8.
CristofaroN. D.Passivity and passivity breakdown of 13%Cr, 15%Cr and 13Cr5Ni2MoN stainless steels in chloride-containing solutions, editors. Advances in corrosion control and materials in oil and gas production. Vol. EFC 26. European Federation of Corrosion; 1999.
9.
SaarinenKHildenJ.Evaluation of 13% chromium martensitic stainless steel in H2S-containing environments by using the contact electric resistance and impedance techniques. In: JackmanPSSmithLM, editors. Advances in corrosion control and materials in oil and gas production. Vol. EFC 26. European Federation of Corrosion; 1999.
10.
RhodesPR.Environment-assisted cracking of corrosion-resistant alloys in oil and gas production environments: a review. Corrosion. 2001; 57 (11): 923–966.
11.
TurnbullAGriffithsA.Corrosion and cracking of weldable 13 wt-% Cr martensitic stainless steels for application in the oil and gas industry. Corros Eng Sci Technol. 2003; 38 (1): 21–50.
UedaMAmayaHOgawaK.Corrosion resistance of weldable super 13Cr stainless steel in H2S containing CO2 environments. In: CORROSION 96, paper: 058. NACE International; 1996.
14.
GodecRPetekADolecekV.Kinetics of passive film formation on martensitic stainless steels. Corrosion. 2000; 56 (7): 694–699.
15.
SunabaTItoTMiyataY. Influence of chloride ions on corrosion of modified martensitic stainless steels at high temperatures under a CO2 environment. Corrosion. 2014; 70 (10): 988–999.
16.
MonnotMNogueiraRPRocheV. Sulfide stress corrosion study of a super martensitic stainless steel in H2S sour environments: metallic sulfides formation and hydrogen embrittlement. Appl Surf Sci. 2017; 394: 132–141.
17.
FeltonPSchofieldMJ.Understanding the high temperature corrosion behaviour of modified 13% Cr martensitic OCTG. In: Corrosion 98, paper: 099. San Diego (CA); 1998.
18.
MarcheboisHAlamiHELeyerJ.Sour service limits of 13% Cr and super 13% Cr stainless steels for OCTG: effect of environmental factors. In: CORROSION 2009, paper: 09084. NACE International; 2009.
19.
ChambersBSkogsbergJMengJ.Evaluation of environmentally assisted cracking resistance of high strength 15Cr steel in sour well environments. In: CORROSION 2012, paper: C2012-0001353. Salt Lake City (UT): NACE International; 2012.
20.
ChambersBDGonzalezMChenY.Sulfide stress cracking of super 13Cr martensitic stainless steel – localized corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement influences. In: CORROSION 2018, paper: 11257. Phoenix (AZ): NACE International; 2018.
21.
ZhangYUrquidi-MacdonaldMEngelhardtGR. Development of localized corrosion damage on low pressure turbine disks and blades: I. Passivity. Electrochim Acta. 2012; 69: 1–11.
22.
MacdonaldDD.The history of the point defect model for the passive state: a brief review of film growth aspects. Electrochim Acta. 2011; 56 (4): 1761–1772.
23.
MacdonaldDD.The point defect model for the passive state. J Electrochem Soc. 1992; 139 (12): 3434–3449.
24.
ZhangYMacdonaldDDUrquidi-MacdonaldM. Passivity breakdown on AISI type 403 stainless steel in chloride-containing borate buffer solution. Corros Sci. 2006; 48 (11): 3812–3823.
25.
BreslinCBMacdonaldDDSikoraE.Photo-inhibition of pitting corrosion on types 304 and 316 stainless steels in chloride-containing solutions. J Elecmchimica Acta. 1997; 42 (1): 137–144.
26.
CaseR.PRinconH.EMcIntyreD.R.Analysis of pit stability in type 316L stainless steel exposed to H2S-saturated dilute chloride solutions above the critical pitting temperature. Corrosion. 2012; 68 (3).
27.
CaseRNewmanRCOlsenS.Pit growth behavior of modified 13 Cr steel in sour environments. In: EUROCORR 2000, paper. London: Institute of Materials; 2000.
28.
LaycockNJNewmanRC.Temperature dependence of pitting potentials for austenitic stainless steels above their critical pitting temperature. Corros Sci. 1998; 40 (6): 887–902.
29.
ErnstPNewmanRC.Pit growth studies in stainless steel foils. I. introduction and pit growth kinetics. Corros Sci. 2002; 44: 927–941.
30.
MoayedMHNewmanRC.The relationship between pit chemistry and pit geometry near the critical pitting temperature. J Electrochem Soc. 2006; 153 (8): B330.
31.
MeckNSKaneRChambersB.Sour service limits of martensitic stainless steels: a review of current knowledge, test methods and development work. In: CORROSION 2013, paper: 2639. Orlando (FL): NACE International; 2013.
32.
PahlavanSMoazenSTajiI. Pitting corrosion of martensitic stainless steel in halide bearing solutions. Corros Sci. 2016; 112: 233–240.
33.
European Federation of Corrosion EFCCorrosion resistant alloys for oil and gas production: guidance on general requirements and test methods for H2S service. Maney; 2002.
34.
AmayaHKondoKHirataH.Effect of chromium and molybdenum on corrosion resistance of super 13Cr martensitic stainless steel in CO2 environment. In: CORROSION 98, paper: 113. San Diego (CA: NACE International; 1998.
35.
RinconHECaseRPTangX.Determination of the critical pitting temperature of stainless steel using electrochemical testing techniques. In: CORROSION 2012, paper: C2012-0001334C2012-0001334. Salt Lake City (UT): NACE International; 2012.
36.
KriksunovLBMacdonaldDDMillettPJ.Tungsten/tungsten oxide pH sensing electrode for high temperature aqueous environments. J Electrochem Soc. 1994; 141 (11): 3002–3005.
37.
ChengC-HNingJCaseR.Development of a reference electrode for study of supercritical Co2 corrosion. In: CORROSION 2018, paper: 11073. Phoenix (AZ): NACE International; 2018.
38.
FrankelGS.Pitting corrosion of metals: a review of the critical factors. J Electrochem Soc. 1998; 145 (6): 2186–2197.
39.
ZhangYUrquidi-MacdonaldMEngelhardtGR. Development of localized corrosion damage on low pressure turbine disks and blades: II. Passivity breakdown. Electrochim Acta. 2012; 69: 12–18.
40.
CaseR.Semiconductor electrochemical study of the passivity limits of austenitic stainless-steel in H2S-containing brines. Corros Eng Sci Technol. 2021; 56 (4): 372–382.
41.
MoayedMHNewmanRC.Evolution of current transients and morphology of metastable and stable pitting on stainless steel near the critical pitting temperature. Corros Sci. 2006; 48 (4): 1004–1018.
42.
SatoN.An overview on the passivity of metals. Corros Sci. 1990; 31: 1–19.
43.
LaycockNJMoayedMHNewmanRC.Metastable pitting and the critical pitting temperature. J Electrochem Soc. 1998; 145 (8): 2622–2628.
44.
GhanbariEKovalovDSaatchiA.The influence of halide ions on the passivity breakdown of carbon steel based on the point defect model. In: CORROSION 2018, paper: 1102511025. Phoenix (NM): NACE International; 2018.
45.
HarunaTMacdonaldDD.Theoretical prediction of the scan rate dependencies of the pitting potential and the probability distribution in the induction time. J Electrochem Soc. 1997; 144 (5): 1574–1581.
46.
YangSMacdonaldDD.Theoretical and experimental studies of the pitting of type 316L stainless steel in borate buffer solution containing nitrate ion. Electrochim Acta. 2007; 52 (5): 1871–1879.
47.
CaseR.Study of the passivity limits of austenitic stainless steel in H2S-containing brines using Mott-Schottky and point defect model analysis. Corrosion. 2021; 77 (7): 764–777.
48.
ErnstPNewmanRC.Pit growth studies in stainless steel foils. II. Effect of temperature, chloride concentration and sulphate addition. Corros Sci. 2002; 44: 943–954.
49.
SikoraESikoraJMacdonaldDD.Nature of the passive film on nickel. Electrochem Acta. 1996; 41 (6): 783–789.
50.
MasamuraKHashizumeSSakaiJ. Polarization behavior of high-alloy OCTG in CO2 environment as affected by chlorides and sulfides. Corrosion. 1987; 43 (6): 359–365.
51.
MacdonaldDDBen-HaimMPallixJ.Sali analysis of passive films on nickel alloys. J Corros Sci. 1990; 31: 223–230.
Sharifi-AslSTaylorMLLuZ. Modeling of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopic behavior of passive iron using a genetic algorithm approach. Electrochim Acta. 2013; 102: 161–173.
