Developing composites of epoxy resins containing graphite is important for technological and scientific research. The applications of these systems in electronic devices have been seen as a promising research field. To contribute to this field, we evaluated the influence of exfoliated graphite dispersed in two resins with different molecular weights (Mw). The glass transition was estimated by dynamic-mechanic analysis (DMA) and the modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC). We calculated the parameters of the phantom model, Williams–Landel–Ferry (WLF) and Vogel–Fulcher–Tumman (VFT) equations, and the parameters correlated with the Angell fragility. The results demonstrated a strong influence of the Mw on the glass transition and its crosslinking density. A more homogeneous system with lower fluctuations of potential energy was achieved with higher Mw resin suggesting advantageous for the structural stability of crosslinking.
LiBZhongW-H. Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 5595–5614.
4.
PascaultHSVerduJWilliamsRJJ. Thermosetting polymers, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 2002.
5.
VanlandinghamMREduljeeRFGillespieJWJr. Relationships between stoichiometry, microstructure, and properties for amine-cured epoxies. J Appl Polym Sci1999; 71: 699–722.
6.
Giraud M, Nguyen T, Gu X, et al. In: Reprinted from the 24th annual meeting of the adhesion society. Proceedings (ed JA Emerson). The Adhesion Society, Blacksburg, VA, February 2001, p.260.
7.
PistorVBarbosaLGSoaresBG. Relaxation phenomena in the glass transition of epoxy/N-phenylaminopropyl-POSS nanocomposites. Polymer2012; 53: 5798–5805.
8.
PistorVSoaresBGMaulerRS. Influence of different concentrations of N-phenylaminopropyl e POSS on the thermodynamic fragility of the cured epoxy resin. Polymer2013; 54: 2292–2298.
9.
KauzmannW. The nature of the glassy state and the behavior of liquids at low temperatures. Chem Rev1948; 4: 219–256.
10.
GibbsJHDimarzioEA. Nature of the glass transition and the glassy state. J Chem Phys1958; 28: 373–383.
11.
AdamGGibbsJH. On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquids. J Chem Phys1965; 43: 139–146.
12.
AngellCARaoKJ. Configurational excitations in condensed matter, and the ``bond lattice'' model for the liquid-glass transition. J Chem Phys1972; 57: 470–481.
13.
SolunovCA. Cooperative molecular dynamics and strong/fragile behavior of polymers. Eur Polym J1999; 35: 1543–1556.
14.
SaiterASaiterJMGrenetJ. Cooperative rearranging regions in polymeric materials: relationship with the fragility of glass-forming liquids. Eur Polym J2006; 42: 213–219.
15.
WilliamsLMLandelRFFerryJD. The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. J Am Chem Soc1955; 77: 3701–3707.
16.
KovacsAJ. Transition vitreuse dans les polymères amorphes. Etude phénoménologique. Adv Polym Sci1964; 3: 394–507.
17.
AngellCA. Landscapes with megabasins: polyamorphism in liquids and biopolymers and the role of nucleation in folding and folding diseases. Phys D1997; 107: 122–142.
18.
BeckerOVarleyRSimonG. Morphology, thermal relaxations and mechanical properties of layered silicate nanocomposites based upon high-functionality epoxy resins. Polymer2002; 43: 4365–4373.
19.
AgagTKogaTTakeichiT. Studies on thermal and mechanical properties of polyimide–clay nanocomposites. Polymer2001; 42: 3399–3408.
20.
PistorVOrnaghiFGOrnaghiHLJr.. Dynamic mechanical characterization of epoxy/epoxycyclohexyl–POSS nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng: A2012; 532: 339–345.
21.
QazviniNTMohammadiN. Dynamic mechanical analysis of segmental relaxation in unsaturated polyester resin networks: effect of styrene content. Polymer2005; 46: 9088–9096.
PelliceSAFasceDPWilliamsRJJ. Properties of epoxy networks derived from the reaction of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes bearing OH-functionalized organic substituents. J Polym Sci B2003; 41: 1451–1461.
24.
AngellCA. Spectroscopy simulation and scattering, and the medium range order problem in glass. J Non-Crystalline Solid1985; 73: 1–17.
25.
OrnaghiHLJr.PistorVZatteraAJ. Effect of the epoxycyclohexyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane content on the dynamic fragility of an epoxy resin. J Non-Crystalline Solids2012; 358: 427–432.
26.
AngelCA. Formation of glasses from liquids and biopolymers. Science1995; 267: 1924–1935.
27.
YasminADanielIM. Mechanical and thermal properties of graphite platelet/epoxy composites. Polymer2004; 45: 8211–8219.
28.
SokolovAPNovikovVNDingY. Why many polymers are so fragile. J Phys2007; 19: 1–8.
29.
DelbreilhLBernèsALacabanneC. Fragility of a thermoplastic polymer. Influence of main chain rigidity in polycarbonate. Mater Lett2005; 59: 2881–2885.
30.
AngellCA. Water II is a “strong” liquid. J Phys Chem1993; 97: 6339–6341.
31.
SastryS. The relationship between fragility, configurational entropy and the potential energy landscape of glass-forming liquids. Nature2001; 409: 164–167.
32.
AngellCA. Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals—strong/fragile patterns and problems. J Non-Crystalline Solid1991; 131–133: 13–31.
33.
SusinSBPistorVAmicoSC. Investigation of cure kinetics in epoxy/multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 131: 39857–39813.
