In this study, silicate 13-93 and borate based 13-93B3 bioactive glass scaffolds with high porosity and interconnected pore structure (pore size 100–500 µm) were prepared by foam replication method. In order to improve the mechanical properties, the scaffolds were coated and infiltrated with a poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) solution at different concentrations (5, 10, and 20 wt%). Results revealed that the mechanical properties of the scaffolds were significantly improved by the PCL coating. The addition of 10% PCL coating led to approximately 10-fold increase of compressive strength in comparison with noncoated scaffolds. The bioactivity of scaffolds upon immersion in simulated body fluid was maintained in the PCL-coated scaffolds at all concentrations; however, a decrease in the formation rate and amount of crystalline hydroxyapatite was observed as the PCL concentration was increased in the coating layer. Degradation rate of the borate-based bioactive glass scaffolds was tailored by the PCL coating. It is concluded that the fabricated bioactive composite scaffolds represent promising candidates for bone tissue engineering applications.
GerhardtL-CBoccacciniAR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials2010; 3: 3867–3910.
2.
HenchLL. Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc1998; 81: 1705–1728.
3.
BrinkMTurunenTHapponenR. Compositional dependence of bioactivity of glasses in the system Na2O-K2O-MgO-CaO-B2O3-P2O5-SiO2. J Mater Sci Mater Med1997; 37: 114–121.
4.
RahamanMNDayDEBalBS. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2011; 7: 2355–2373.
5.
DayDEWhiteJEBrownRF. Transformation of borate glasses into biologically useful materials. Glass Technol Part A2003; 44: 75–81.
6.
YaoAWangDHuangW. In vitro bioactive characteristics of borate-based glasses with controllable degradation behavior. J Am Ceram Soc2007; 90: 303–306.
7.
FuQRahamanMNFuH. Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A2010; 95A: 164–171.
8.
FuQRahamanMNBalS. In vivo evaluation of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds with trabecular and oriented microstructures in a subcutaneous rat implantation model. J Biomed Mater Res Part A2010; 95A: 235–244.
9.
Boccaccini AR, Chatzistavrou X, Mohamad Yunos D, et al. Biodegradable polymer-bioceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on composite structures ICCM17, 2013, pp. 1–9.
10.
Chen Q, Roether JA and Boccaccini AR. Tissue engineering scaffolds from bioactive glass and composite materials. In: Ashammakhi N, Reis R and Chiellin F (eds) Topics in Tissue Engineering. Vol. 4, 2008, pp.3–27. Available at://http://www.aulu.fi/spareparts/eook_topics_in_t_e_vol4/.
11.
ChenQZBoccacciniAR. Poly(D,L-lactic acid) coated 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds: processing and characterization. J Biomed Mater Res2006; 77A: 445–457.
12.
Ibara A, Miyaji H, Fugetsu B, et al. Osteoconductivity and biodegradability of collagen scaffold coated with nano-β-TCP and fibroblast growth factor. J Nanomater 2013; 2013: 1–11.
13.
Xing Z-C, Han S-J, Shin Y-S, et al. Fabrication of biodegradable polyester nanocomposites by electrospinning for tissue engineering. J Nanomater 2011; Article ID 929378: 1–18.
14.
O’Shea TM and Miao X. Preparation and characterization of PLGA-coated porous bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for subchondral bone tissue engineering. Ceramic Transactions. In: The proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Ceramic Mater, and Components for Energy and Environmental Applications, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 2008.
15.
Foroughi MR, Karbasi S and Sassan Sh.S. Bioactivity evaluation of nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite scaffolds coated with poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on nanostructures (ICNS4) Sharif University of Technology, Kish Island, I.R. Iran, 2012, pp.772–774.
16.
ZhaoJLuXDuanK. Improving the mechanical and biological properties of macroporous HA scaffolds through composite coatings. Coll Surf B: Biointerf2009; 74: 159–166.
17.
RoohaniesfahaniSNouri-KhorasaniSLuZAppleyardRZreiqatH. The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite–PCL composites. Biomaterials2010; 31: 5498–5509.
18.
BangLTTsuruKMunarM. Mechanical behavior and cell response of PCL coated α-TCP foam for cancellous-type bone replacement. Ceram Int2013; 39: 5631–5637.
19.
ZhaoJDuanKZhangJW. The influence of polymer concentrations on the structure and mechanical properties of porous polycaprolactone-coated hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Appl Surf Sci2010; 256: 4586–4590.
20.
BretcanuOChenQZMisraSK. Biodegradable polymer coated 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Eur J Glass Sci Technol A2007; 48: 227–227.
21.
ShorLCuceriSWenX. Fabrication of three-dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds and osteoblast-scaffold interactions in vitro. Biomaterials2007; 28: 5291–5297.
22.
KokuboTKushitaniHSakaS. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J Biomed Mater Res1990; 24: 721–734.
23.
KarageorgiouVKaplanD. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials2005; 26: 5474–5491.
24.
GuYHuangWRahamanMN. Bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with fibrous scaffolds composed of a mixture of silicate and borate bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 9126–9136.
25.
LiangWRahamanMNDayDE. Bioactive borate glass scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Non-Cryst Solids2008; 354: 1690–1696.
26.
Wagoner-JohnsonAJHerschlerBA. A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair. Acta Biomaterialia2011; 7: 16–30.
27.
BalgováZPalouMWasserbauerJ. Preparation, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite biphasique membranes. Acta Chimica Slovaca2013; 6: 8–14.
28.
JonesJRSepulvedaPHenchLL. Dose-dependent behavior of bioactive glass dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res A2001; 58: 720–726.
29.
KimH-MHimenoTKawashitaM. The mechanism of biomineralization of bone like apatite on synthetic hydroxyapatite: an in vitro assessment. J R Soc Interf2004; 1: 17–22.
30.
RhoJY. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys1998; 20: 92–102.
HulbertSFYoungFAMathewsRS. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res1970; 4: 433–456.
33.
ChuTMOrtonDGHollisterSJ. Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures. Biomaterials2002; 23: 1283–1293.
34.
GongWAbdelouasALutzeW. Porous bioactive glass and glass-ceramics made by reaction sintering under pressure. J Biomed Mater Res2001; 54: 320–327.
35.
El-GhannamAR. Advanced bioceramic composite for bone tissue engineering: design principles and structure-bioactivity relationship. J Biomed Mater Res A2004; 69: 490–501.
36.
BramMSchieferHBogdanskiD. Implant surgery: how bone bonds to PM titanium. Metal Powd Rep2006; 61: 26–31.
37.
EsenZBorS. Processing of titanium foams using magnesium spacer particles. Scripta Materialia2007; 56: 341–344.
