The finite difference method is used to solve the time-dependent thermo mechanical response of a layered composite structure subjected to fire. State variables of the composite are chosen whereby the external and internal boundary conditions are derived for an irregular grid through the thickness of the structure. The homogenised mass flux and specific heat capacity of pyrolysis gases over a layered composite is also defined. The formulations are tested against documented results found in the literature.
MouritzAGibsonA. Fire properties of polymer composite materials, The Netherlands: Springer, 2006.
2.
FeihSMathysZGibsonA. Modelling compressice skin failure of sandwich composites in fire. J Sandwich Struct Mater2008; 10: 217–245.
3.
KandareEGriffinGJFeihS. Fire structural modelling of fibre-polymer laminates protected with an intumescent coating. Compos A2012; 43: 793–802.
4.
MouritzAFeihSKandareE. Review of fire structural modelling of polymer composites. Compos A2009; 40: 1800–1814.
5.
FeihSMouritzAMathysZ. Fire structural modeling of polymer composites with passive thermal barrier. J Fire Sci2010; 28: 141–160.
6.
LooyehMPadosKBettesP. Thermochemical response of sandwich panels to fire. Finite Elem Anal Des2001; 37: 913–927.
7.
HenderssonJWiebeltTTantM. A model for the thermal response of polymer composite materials with experimental verification. J Compos Mater1985; 19: 579–595.
8.
LattimerBYOuelletteJTrellesJ. Thermal response of composite materials to elevated temperatures. Fire Technol2011; 47: 823–850.
9.
GibsonAWuYEvansJ. Laminate theory analysis of composites under load in fire. J Compos Mater2006; 40: 639–658.
10.
GibsonAFeihSMouritzA. Development in characterising the structural behaviour of composites in fire. Chapter 8. London: Springer, 2011, pp. 187–218.
11.
FeihSMathysZGibsonA. Modelling the compression strength of polymer laminates in fire. Compos A2007; 38: 2354–2365.
12.
FeihSMouritzAMathysZ. Tensile strength modeling of glass fibre polymer composites in fire. J Compos Mater2007; 14: 2387–2410.
13.
FeihSMathysZGibsonA. Modelling the tension and compression strength of polymer laminates in fire. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 551–564.
14.
WennbergDStichelSWennhageP. Optimisation of sandwich panels for the load carrying structure of high-speed rail vehicles. Int J Aerospace Lightweight Struct (IJALS)2012; 2: 19–40.
15.
BockhornHHornungAHornungU. Mechanisms and kinetics of thermal decomposition of plastics from isothermal and dynamic measurements. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis1999; 50: 77–101.
16.
Federal Aviation Administration. Flammability properties of aircraft carbon-fiber structural composite. Tech. Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
17.
DIAB Group AB. Divinycell H100 specific heat. Tech. Report, Norra Sofieroleden 8, SE-312 22 Laholm, Sweden, 2012.
18.
U.S Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Determination of the heats of gasification of polymers using differential scanning calorimetry. Tech. Report, National Technical Information Services (NTIS), Springfield, VA, USA, 2007.
19.
McGurn M, DesJardin P and Dodd A. Numerical simulation of expansion and charring of carbon-epoxy laminates in fire environments. US Department of Energy Publications paper no. 124, 2012.
20.
TSI C(2008) 648. Commission decision concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system. Tech. Report, Official Journal of the European Union, 2008.
21.
Peacock RD, Averill JD, Madrzykowski D, et al. Fire safety of passenger trains; phase III: Evaluation of fire hazard analysis using full-scale passenger rail car tests. Tech. Report, NISTIR 6563, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2004.
