Effects of variation in autoclave pressure,temperature,and vacuum-application time on porosity and mechanical properties of a carbon fiber/epoxy composite *
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2012
Effects of variation in autoclave pressure,temperature,and vacuum-application time on porosity and mechanical properties of a carbon fiber/epoxy composite *
This article presents results from investigation of the effects of variation in autoclave pressure, temperature, and vacuum-application time on porosity, hot/wet (H/W) and room temperature/dry (RT/D) short beam shear (SBS) strength, and failure mechanism of a commercial carbon fiber/epoxy prepreg, Cycom IM7/977-2 unidirectional tape. Fourteen cure cycles were designed to study a wide range of curing pressures, curing temperatures, and two different vacuum-application durations, including vacuum vented at recommended pressure and vacuum held throughout the cure cycle. The results showed that the SBS strength did not vary significantly over a relatively wide range of curing temperatures and pressures if vacuum was vented at recommended curing pressure; however, after a certain point, a decreasing trend in the SBS strength was observed by reducing the curing temperature and pressure. The C-scan images of panels cured with the vacuum held throughout the cure cycles revealed presence of a high-porosity cross-shaped defect at the center of the panels. The observed defect became larger as the curing pressure decreased. The correlation between the SBS strength and the void content was studied using theoretical models and experimental data. The investigation of the failure modes for each panel showed a change in both the H/W and the RT/D failure mechanism as a result of variation in curing temperature and pressure.
CiriscioliPRSpringerGSLeeWI. An expert system for autoclave curing of composites. J Compos Mater1991; 25(12): 1542–1587.
2.
LeeS-YSpringerGS. Effects of cure on the mechanical properties of composites. J Compos Mater1988; 22(1): 15–29.
3.
PetersPWM. Influence of cure temperature and degree of surface treatment on transverse cracking and fibre/matrix bond strength in CFRP. J Compos Mater1994; 28(6): 507–525.
4.
Gernaat C, Alavi-Soltani S, Guzman M, Rodriguez A, Minaie B and Welch J. Correlation between viscoelastic and mechanical properties for and out-of-autoclave polymer composite. In: International SAMPE Technical Conference, Wichita, KS, USA, 2009.
5.
Alavi-SoltaniSSabzevariSKoushyarHMinaieB. Thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a polymer composite cured at different isothermal cure temperatures. J Compos Mater2011(in press). DOI: 10.1177/0021998311415443.
6.
CaoYCameronJ. The effect of curing conditions on the properties of silica modified glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite. J Reinf Plast Compos2007; 26(1): 41–50.
7.
WhiteSRKimYK. Staged curing of composite materials. Composites Part A1996; 27(3): 219–227.
8.
BowlesKJFrimpongS. Void effects on the interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional graphite-fiber-reinforced composites. J Compos Mater1992; 26(10): 1487–1509.
9.
TangJ-MLeeWISpringerGS. Effects of cure pressure on resin flow, voids, and mechanical properties. J Compos Mater1987; 21(5): 421–440.
10.
BoeyFYCLyeSW. Void reduction in autoclave processing of thermoset composites: part 1: high pressure effects on void reduction. Composites1992; 23(4): 261–265.
11.
LiuLZhangB-MWangD-FWuZ-J. Effects of cure cycles on void content and mechanical properties of composite laminates. Compos Struct2006; 73(3): 303–309.
12.
OlivierPCottuJPFerretB. Effects of cure cycle pressure and voids on some mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy laminates. Composites1995; 26(7): 509–515.
13.
BoeyFYCLyeSW. Effects of vacuum and pressure in an autoclave curing process for a thermosetting fibre-reinforced composite. J Mater Process Technol1990; 23(2): 121–131.
MouritzAP. Ultrasonic and interlaminar properties of highly porous composites. J Compos Mater2000; 34(3): 218–239.
16.
De AlmeidaSFMDe Mas SantacreuAC. Environmental effects in composite laminates with voids. Polym Polym Compos1995; 3(3): 193–204.
17.
CostaMLRezendeMCDe AlmeidaSFM. Strength of hygrothermally conditioned polymer composites with voids. J Compos Mater2005; 39(21): 1943–1961.
18.
BiceranoJ. Prediction of polymer properties, 3rd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2002.
19.
CampbellFCMallowARBrowningCE. Porosity in carbon fiber composites: an overview of causes. J Adv Mater1995; 26(4): 18–33.
20.
WisnomMRReynoldsTGwilliamN. Reduction in interlaminar shear strength by discrete and distributed voids. Compos Sci Technol1996; 56(1): 93–101.
21.
Muller de AlmeidaSFNogueira Neto ZdS. Effect of void content on the strength of composite laminates. Compos Struct1994; 28(2): 139–148.
22.
GuYLiMZhangZSunZ. Void formation model and measuring method of void formation condition during hot pressing process. Polym Compos2010; 31(9): 1562–1571.
23.
GrunenfelderLKNuttSR. Void formation in composite prepregs - effect of dissolved moisture. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(16): 2304–2309.
24.
WhiteSRKimYK. Staged curing of composite materials. Composites Part A1996; 27(3): 219–227.
25.
KardosJLDudukovicMPMcKagueELLehmanMW. Void formation and transport during composite laminate processing: an initial model framework. ASTM Special Technical Publication1983; 797: 96–109.
26.
MurthyPLNChamisCC. Integrated composite analyzer (ICAN)-users and programmers manual. NASA Technical Paper 25151986.
27.
ChamisCCHandlerLMManderscheidJ. Composite nanomechanics: a mechanictic properties prediction. NASA/TM—2007-2146732007.
28.
LeeSM. International encyclopedia of composites, Vol. 1–2. New York: VCH.
29.
HarperBDStaabGHChenRS. A note on the effects of voids upon the hygral and mechanical properties of AS4/3502 graphite/epoxy. J Compos Mater1987; 21(3): 280–289.
30.
BotelhoECPardiniLCRezendeMC. Hygrothermal effects on the shear properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. J Mater Sci2006; 41(21): 7111–7118.
31.
ImazJJRodriguezJLRubioAMondragonI. Hydrothemal environment influence on water diffusion and mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre/epoxy laminates. J Mater Sci Lett1991; 10(11): 662–665.
ASTM International. Standard test method for the assignment of the glass transition temperature by modulated temperature differential scanning calorimetry. ASTM Standard: E2602 - 09, 2009.
34.
DusiMRLeeWCiriscioliPRSpringerGS. Cure kinetics and viscosity of fiberite 976 resin. J Compos Mater1987; 21(3): 243–261.
35.
ASTM International. Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. ASTM Standard: D 2344/D 2344M – 00, 2006.
36.
ASTM International. Standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials. ASTM Standard: D3171 - 09, 2009.
37.
BankLCGentryTRBarkattA. Accelerated test methods to determine the long-term behavior of FRP composite structures: environmental effects. J Reinf Plast Compos1995; 14(6): 559–587.
38.
ASTM International. Standard test methods for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymeric matrix composite materials. ASTM Standard: D5229/D5229M - 92(2010)2010.
39.
PomiesFCarlssonLA. Analysis of modulus and strength of dry and wet thermoset and thermoplastic composites loaded in transverse tension. J Compos Mater1994; 28(1): 22–35.
40.
HuangHTalrejaR. Effects of void geometry on elastic properties of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65(13): 1964–1981.
