An experimental investigation into the adhesion of regenerated cellulose fiber lyocell, natural cellulose fiber ramie, and E-glass fiber to the polypropylene (PP) and epoxy matrices, by means of the microbond technique, was conducted. Force–displacement plots indicate a brittle failure of the interface, followed by high frictional forces in the PP matrix and low frictional forces in the epoxy matrix. The interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of lyocell–epoxy system was significantly higher than that measured in the lyocell–PP system. Chemical modification of lyocell fiber with maleic anhydride resulted in a two-fold increase in IFSS with PP. Ramie exhibits better adhesion characteristics, due mainly to the rough surface, than lyocell.
MohantyAKMisraMDrzalLT. Natural fibres, biopolymers and bio-composites. Perma: CRC-Taylor & Francis group, 2005. Chap. 1, 2, 6, 7, and 9,
2.
WallenbergerFTWestonNE. Natural fibres, plastics and composites. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005. Chap. 1, 8, 9, 14–16, and 18,
3.
ThygesenLGBilde-SorensenJBHoffmeyerP. Visualisation of dislocations in hemp fibres: a comparison between scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and polarised light microscopy (PLM). Ind Crops Prod2006; 24: 181–185.
4.
FinkHPWeigelPGeigerOBuschM. Neue Commodity-Verbundmaterialien unter Verwendung von Celluloseregeneratfasern. Tech Text2004; 47: 126–130.
5.
FrankoASeavyKCGumaerJGlasserWG. Continious cellulose fibre-reinforced cellulose ester composites III – commercial matrix and fibre options. Cellulose2001; 8: 171–179.
6.
LützkendorfRMieckKPReußmannTNechwatalAEilersM. Lyocellfasern – ihr Entwicklungsstand unter dem Aspekt des Einsatzes in Composites. In: 3rd international wood and natural fibre composite symposium, Kassel, Germany, 2000, 28–29 June.
7.
FinkHPWeigelPPurjHJGansterJ. Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci2001; 26: 1473–1524.
8.
AdusumalliRBReiffersciedMWeberHRoederTSixtaHGindlW. Mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose fibres for composites. Macromol Symp2006; 244: 119–125.
PitkethlyMJFavreJPGaurU. A round-robin programme on interfacial test methods. Compos Sci Technol1993; 48: 205–214.
11.
MillerBMuriPRebenfeldL. A microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fibre/resin interface. Compos Sci Technol1987; 28: 17–32.
12.
McdonoughWGAntonucciJMDunkersJP. Interfacial shear strengths of dental resin-glass fibres by the microbond test. Dent Mater2001; 17: 492–498.
13.
PisanovaEZhandarovSMäderEAhmadIYoungRJ. Three techniques of interfacial bond strength estimation from direct observation of crack initiation and propagation in polymer-fibre systems. Composites Part A2001; 32: 435–443.
14.
ZhandarovSMäderE. Characterization of fibre/matrix interface strength: applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 149–160.
15.
CravenJPCrippsRVineyC. Evaluating the silk/epoxy interface by means of the microbond test. Composites Part A2000; 31: 653–660.
16.
NamSNetravaliAN. Characterization of ramie fibre/soy protein concentrate (SPN) resin interface. J Adhes Sci Technol2004; 18(9): 1063–1076.
17.
BaleyCBusnelFGrohensYSireO. Influence of chemical treatments on surface properties and adhesion of flax fibre-polyester resin. Composites Part A2006; 37: 1626–1637.
18.
FelixJMGatenholmP. The nature of adhesion in composites of modified cellulose fibres and polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci1991; 42: 609–620.
19.
StamboulisABaillieCSchulzE. Interfacial characterization of flax fibre-thermoplastic polymer composites by the pull-out test. Angew Makromol Chem1999; 272: 117–120.
20.
BledzkiAKReihmaneSGassanJ. Properties and modification methods for vegetable fibres for natural fibre composites. J Appl Polym Sci1996; 59: 1329–1336.
21.
LuoSOoijWJV. Surface modification of textile fibres for improvement of adhesion to polymeric matrices: a review. J Adhes Sci Technol2002; 16(3): 1715–1735.
22.
GeorgeJSreekalaMSThomasS. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fibre reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci2001; 41(9): 1471–1485.
23.
Ünal Ö and Bansal NP. In-plane and Interlaminar shear strength of unidirectional Hi-Nicalon fibre-reinforced celsian matrix composites. NASA report: TM-2000-210608, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, 2000.
AdusumalliRBMüllerURoederTWeberHSixtaHGindlW. Tensile testing of single regenerated cellulose fibres. Macromol Symp2006; 244: 83–88.
26.
PiggottMRXiongYJ. Visualization of debonding of fully and partially embedded E-glass fibres in epoxy resins. Compos Sci Technol1994; 52: 535–540.
27.
Herrera-FrancoPJValadez-GonzalezA. A study of the mechanical properties of short natural fibre reinforced composites. Composites Part B2005; 36: 597–608.
28.
ZinckPWagnerHDSalmonLGerardJF. Are microcomposites realistic models of the fibre/matrix interface? II. Physico-chemical approach. Polymer2001; 42: 6641–6650.
29.
EichhornSJYoungRJ. Composite micromechanics of hemp fibres and epoxy resin microdroplets. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 767–772.
30.
KarlssonJOBlachotJFPeguyAGatenholmP. Improvement of adhesion between polyethylene and regenerated cellulose fibres by surface fibrillation. Polym Compos1996; 17: 300–304.
31.
GansterJFinkHPPinnowM. High-tenacity regenerated cellulose fibre reinforced thermoplastics – injection moulding compounds with polyprophylene and alternative matrices. Composites Part A2006; 37: 1796–1804.
