Towards Automatic Designing of 2D Biaxial Woven and Braided Fabric Reinforced Composites

Abstract

This paper presents a general methodology to automatically analyze the stiffness and strength of a textile composite reinforced with any 2D (twodimensional)biaxial woven or braided preform only using its constituent fiber and matrix properties and limited number of independent textile geometric parameters. The textile composite under consideration can be subjected to an arbitrary load condition. Based on the assumption of a perfect contact between the fill and warp yarns and a microphotographic observation, a geometric model is developed to describe the yarn architecture of the 2D biaxial woven or braided fabric structure. The textile composite is eventually subdivided into small elements, each of which is considered as a unidirectional (UD)fibrous composite in its local coordinate system. The bridging micromechanics model is applied to determine the 3D mechanical properties of the UD composite at each load level up to failure based on the information of the current constituent properties and the fiber volume fraction. The matrix properties have been defined according to the averaged value of the current three principal stresses in the matrix. If this value is positive, the properties obtained from a tensile experiment should be used; otherwise, those from a compression test are employed. This is because the matrix material in the textile composite is usually subjected to 3D stress state, and is because a polymer matrix generally has different properties in a uniaxial tension from those in a uniaxial compression. The resulting properties of all the UD composites are assembled by means of a volume average based on either iso-strain or iso-stress approach, to give the overall stiffness and strength of the textile composite. One significant advantage of the present method is that only minimal input data are required, which can be easily measured before composite fabrication or taken as designing variables. Thus, an automatic design for the required properties of a textile composite can be achieved. Applications have been made to those composites reinforced with plain, 5-harness and 8-harness satin weaves and diamond and regular braids. While limited test results for the woven fabric composites are available from the literature, an extensive experimental program has been carried out to measure stiffnesses, strengths, and stress–strain curves of the braid composites under uniaxial tensile load. Two different material systems, i.e., glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy systems, each with three different braiding angles have been studied. It has been found that the iso-strain assemblage scheme gives grossly better correlation for both the stiffness and strength of all the composites with the experiments.

Keywords

woven composite braided composite textile structure unit cell geometry model mechanical property stiffness strength micromechanics modeling bridging model automatic design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Whitcomb, J.D. (1991). Three-Dimensional stress-analysis of plain weave composites. Composite Materials Fatigue and Fracture (Vol. 3). ASTM STP 1110. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials. pp. 417–438.

2. Woo, K. and Whitcomb, J.D. (1994). Global/local finite element analysis for textile composites. J. Comp. Mater., 28(14): 1305–1321.

3. Srirengan, K. , Whitcomb, J. and Chapman, C. (1997). Modal technique for three-dimensional global/local stress analysis of plain weave composites. Comp. Struct., 39(1–2): 145–156.

4. Foye, R.L. (1993). Approximating the stress field within the unit cell of a fabric reinforced composite using replacement elements, NASA CR-191422. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

5. Coe, B.N. , Carter, W.C. and Fleck, N.A. (1994). A binary model of textile composites-I: formulation. ACTA Metall. Mater., 42: 3463–3479.

6. Blackketter, D.M. , Walrath, D.E. and Hansen, A.C. (1993). Modeling damage in a plain weave fabric-reinforced composite material. J. Comp. Tech. Res. JCTRER, 15(2): 36–142.

7. Ishikawa, T. and Chou, T.W. (1982). Elastic behavior of woven hybrid composites. J. Comp. Mater., 16: 2–19.

8. Ishikawa, T. and Chou, T.W. (1983). In-plane thermal expansion and thermal bending coefficients of fabric composites. J. Comp. Mater., 17: 92–104.

9. Ishikawa, T. and Chou, T.W. (1983). Nonlinear behavior of woven fabric composites. J. Comp. Mater., 17: 399–413.

10.

10. Naik, R.A. , Ifju, P.G. and Masters, J.E. (1994). Effect of fiber architecture parameters on deformation fields and elastic moduli of 2-D braided composites. J. Comp. Mater., B28: 656–681.

11.

11. Naik, R.A. (1994). Analysis of woven and braided fabric reinforced composites, NASA CR-194930. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001. Washington, DC: Langley Research Center.

12.

12. Naik, R.A. (1995). Failure analysis of woven and braided fabric reinforced composites. J. Comp. Mater., 29: 2234–2363.

13.

13. Dow, N.F. and Ramnath, V. (1987). Analysis of woven fabrics for reinforced composite materials, NASA CR-178275. Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

14.

14. Ito, M. and Chou, T.W. (1998). An analytical and experimental study of strength and failure behavior of plain weave composites. J. Comp. Mater., 32(1): 2–30.

15.

15. Philippidis, T.P. and Vassilopoulos, A.P. (1999). Fatigue strength prediction under multiaxial stress. J. Comp. Mater., 33: 1579–1599.

16.

16. Huang, Z.M. (2001). Simulation of the mechanical properties of fibrous composites by the bridging micromechanics model. Composites Part A, 32(2): 143–172.

17.

17. Huang, Z.M. , Ramakrishna, S. and Tay, A.A.O. (1999). A micromechanical approach to the tensile strength of a knitted fabric composite. J. Comp. Mater., 33(19): 1758–1791.

18.

18. Huang, Z.M. (2000). Simulation of inelastic response of multidirectional laminates based on stress failure criteria. Materials Science and Technology, 16(6): 692–698.

19.

19. Huang, Z.M. (2000) The mechanical properties of composites reinforced with woven and braided fabrics. Comp. Sci. Tech., 60(4): 479–498.

20.

20. Masters, J.E. , Foye, R.L. , Pastore, C.M. and Gowayed, Y.A. (1993). Mechanical properties of triaxially braided composites: experimental and analytical results. J. Comp. Tech. Res., 15: 112–122.

21.

21. Adams, D.F. (1974). Elastoplastic behavior of composites. In: Sendeckyj, G.P. (ed.), Mechanics of Composite Materials. New York: Academic Press. pp. 169–208.

22.

22. Reuss, A.Z. (1929). Angew. Math. Mech., 9: 49-49.

23.

23. Voigt, W. (1889). Wied. Ann., 38: 573-573.

24.

24. Huang, Z.M. (2000). A unified micromechanical model for the mechanical properties of two constituent composite materials, part V: laminate strength. J. Therm. Comp. Mater., 13(3): 190–206.

25.

25. Fujita, A. , Maekawa, Z. , Hamada, H. and Yokoyama, A. (1992). Mechanical behavior and fracture mechanism in flat braided composites, part 1: braided flat bar. J. Reinf. Plastics Comp., 2: 600-600.

26.

26. Foye, R.L. (1992). Finite element analysis of the stiffness of fabric reinforced composites, NASA CR-189597. Hampton, Virginia: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

27.

27. Soden, P.D. , Hinton, M.J. and Kaddour, A.S. (1998). Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fiber-reinforced composite laminates. Comp. Sci. Tech., 58: 1011–1022.

28.

28. Huang, Z.M. (1999). Micromechanical strength formulae of unidirectional composites. Materials Letters, 40(4): 164–169.