Additive manufacturing of lattice structures offers superior lightweight and energy-absorbing properties across aviation, automotive, and biomedical sectors. However, achieving dimensional precision remains a primary obstacle to ensuring design compatibility and product functionality. To address this challenge, this study introduces a novel comparative analysis of BCC, Diamond, and Octet Truss geometries, specifically focusing on the interplay between infill density and strut thickness. By evaluating PLA-fabricated plates with thicknesses of 0.8 mm, 1 mm, and 1.2 mm through microscopic CAD-to-print comparison, the research identifies critical accuracy thresholds. Findings demonstrate that higher infill ratios significantly enhance structural stability; notably, Octet Truss structures exhibited substantially lower dimensional deviations (0.694%–1.923%) compared to BCC structures (1.25%–3.546%). Furthermore, increasing strut thickness to 1.2 mm reduced deviation rates by up to 50% compared to 0.8 mm struts. These results provide a significant resource for optimizing additive manufacturing parameters, offering new insights into achieving high-precision fabrication for complex lattice systems.
AkbayÖCBahçeEUysalA, et al.Production and cleaning of lattice structures used in the space and aerospace industry with metal additive manufacturing method. J Mater Eng Perform2022; 31(8): 6310–6321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06541-2
2.
AbdulhameedOAl-AhmariAAmeenW, et al.Additive manufacturing: challenges, trends, and applications. Adv Mech Eng2019; 11(2): 1687814018822880. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018822880
3.
LiuYZhengGLetovN, et al.A survey of modeling and optimization methods for multi-scale heterogeneous lattice structures. J Mech Des2021; 143(4): 040803. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047917
4.
MorseEDantanJYAnwerN, et al.Tolerancing: managing uncertainty from conceptual design to final product. CIRP Ann2018; 67(2): 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.05.009
FangQXiongGZhouM, et al.Process monitoring, diagnosis and control of additive manufacturing. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2022; 21(1): 1041–1067. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2022.3215258
7.
CaoLLiJHuJ, et al.Optimization of surface roughness and dimensional accuracy in LPBF additive manufacturing. Opt Laser Technol2021; 142: 107246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107246
8.
KechagiasJChaidasDVidakisN, et al.Key parameters controlling surface quality and dimensional accuracy: a critical review of FFF process. Mater Manuf Process2022; 37(9): 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2032144
9.
LiPMaYESunW, et al.Mechanical behaviors and failure modes of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V lattice structures under compressive load. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 180: 109778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109778
10.
AkbayÖCBahçeE. Investigation of mechanical performance of hybrid design porous structures manufactured from CoCr alloy. Progr Addit Manuf2024; 10: 3695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00842-3
11.
IlyasRASapuanSMHarussaniMM, et al.Polylactic acid (PLA) biocomposite: processing, additive manufacturing and advanced applications. Polymers2021; 13(8): 1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081326
12.
MontezMWillisKRendlerH, et al.Fused deposition modeling (FDM): processes, material properties, and applications. In: Tribology of Additively Manufactured Materials. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 137–163.
13.
LivolsiFMayTCaputoD, et al.Multiscale study on effect of humidity on shape memory polymers used in three-dimensional printing. J Manuf Sci Eng2021; 143(9): 091010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050550
14.
SpoerkMHolzerCGonzalez‐GutierrezJ. Material extrusion‐based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: a review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpage. J Appl Polym Sci2020; 137(12): 48545. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.48545
15.
BauerJMezaLRSchaedlerTA, et al.Nanolattices: an emerging class of mechanical metamaterials. Adv Mater2017; 29(40): 1701850. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701850
16.
XinHTangDDangL, et al.Fatigue failure mechanisms and life prediction of additive manufactured metallic lattices: a comprehensive review. Virtual Phys Prototyp2025; 20(1): e2451124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2025.2451124
17.
OjoOOTabanE. Post-processing treatments–microstructure–performance interrelationship of metal additive manufactured aerospace alloys: a review. Mater Sci Technol2023; 39(1): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2022.2130530
18.
NoronhaJQianMLearyM, et al.Additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V horizontal hollow struts with submillimetre wall thickness by laser powder bed fusion. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 179: 109620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109620
19.
MaconachieTLearyMLozanovskiB, et al.SLM lattice structures: properties, performance, applications and challenges. Mater Des2019; 183: 108137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137
20.
ZhangLFeihSDaynesS, et al.Energy absorption characteristics of metallic triply periodic minimal surface sheet structures under compressive loading. Addit Manuf2018; 23: 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.007
21.
AkbayÖCÖzdemirBBahçeE, et al.Mechanical characterization of lattice structure produced by additive manufacturing under torsion and compression. J Cell Plast2024; 60(1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x231224775
22.
EpastoGPalombaGD'AndreaD, et al.Ti-6Al-4V ELI microlattice structures manufactured by electron beam melting: effect of unit cell dimensions and morphology on mechanical behaviour. Mater Sci Eng, A2019; 753: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.03.014
23.
ZhangXZTangHPLearyM, et al.Toward manufacturing quality Ti-6Al-4V lattice struts by selective electron beam melting (SEBM) for lattice design. JOM2018; 70: 1870–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3030-x
24.
GeorgeELiacourasPRybickiFJ, et al.Measuring and establishing the accuracy and reproducibility of 3D printed medical models. Radiographics2017; 37(5): 1424–1450. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160165
25.
DongGTangYZhaoYF. A survey of modeling of lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. J Mech Des2017; 139(10): 100906. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037305
26.
LozanovskiBLearyMTranP, et al.Computational modelling of strut defects in SLM manufactured lattice structures. Mater Des2019; 171: 107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107671
27.
LiuRChenWZhaoJ. A review on factors affecting the mechanical properties of additively-manufactured lattice structures. J Mater Eng Perform2024; 33(10): 4685–4711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-08423-1
28.
AkbayÖCBahçeE. Investigation of the effect of unit cell type on the mechanical properties of lattice structures by dynamic point tracking. J Mater Eng Perform2026, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-026-13363-7
29.
BrennanMCKeistJSPalmerTA. Defects in metal additive manufacturing processes. J Mater Eng Perform2021; 30: 4808.
MoradiMRezayatMRozhbianyFAR, et al.Correlation between infill percentages, layer width, and mechanical properties in fused deposition modelling of poly-lactic acid 3D printing. Machines2023; 11(10): 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11100950
González-NavarreteRVidal-LessoAPlascencia-MoraH, et al.I-WP geometry structural assessment: a theoretical, experimental, and numerical analysis. J Cell Plast2025; 61(1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x241281655
34.
QiuCYueSAdkinsNJ, et al.Influence of processing conditions on strut structure and compressive properties of cellular lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng, A2015; 628: 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.031
