Understanding the viscoelastic properties of EPP foams is of crucial importance for their use in industrial applications. However, mechanical testing of polymeric foams is challenging due to the difficulties that arise from their morphology. For this reason, here currently available DMA methods using a single drive and a multi-drive rheometer as well as multiple loading directions are investigated in detail. Experimental challenges are highlighted and discussed with regard to foam-specific properties. Special focus is laid on the influence of compressive pre-strain. Based on the results, guidelines to perform reproducible DMA tests on the investigated type of material are derived. In addition, the results give deeper insight into the deformation behavior of bead foams at small strain levels and reveal an early onset of the transition from linear to plateau regime.
RapsDHossienyNParkCB, et al.Past and present developments in polymer bead foams and bead foaming technology. Polymer2015; 56: 5–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.078.
2.
JinFLZhaoMParkM, et al.Recent trends of foaming in polymer processing: a review. Polymers2019; 11(6): 953. DOI: 10.3390/polym11060953.
3.
KuhnigkJStandauTDörrD, et al.Progress in the development of bead foams – a review. J Cell Plast2022; 58(4): 707–735. DOI: 10.1177/0021955X221087603.
4.
GebhartTMJehnichenDKoschichowR, et al.Multi-scale modelling approach to homogenise the mechanical properties of polymeric closed-cell bead foams. Int J Eng Sci2019; 145: 103168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.103168.
5.
AvalleMBelingardiGMontaniniR. Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram. Int J Impact Eng2001; 25(5): 455–472. DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(00)00060-9.
6.
OzturkUEAnlasG. Energy absorption calculations in multiple compressive loading of polymeric foams. Mater Des2009; 30(1): 15–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.054.
7.
MortonDTReyesAClausenAH, et al.Mechanical response of low density expanded polypropylene foams in compression and tension at different loading rates and temperatures. Mater Today Commun2020; 23: 100917. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100917.
8.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. The mechanics of foams: basic results. In: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 175–234
9.
KochIPreißGMüller-PabelM, et al.Analysis of density-dependent bead and cell structure of expanded polypropylene bead foams from x-ray computed tomography of different resolution. J Cell Plast2023; 59(2): 165–184. DOI: 10.1177/0021955X231165343.
10.
ChenYDasRBattleyM. Finite element analysis of the compressive and shear responses of structural foams using computed tomography. Compos Struct2017; 159: 784–799. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.091.
11.
DonnardAGuérardSMaheoL, et al.Multiaxial experiments with radial loading paths on a polymeric foam. Polym Test2018; 67: 441–449. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.003.
12.
RossacciJShivkumarS. Bead fusion in polystyrene foams. J Mater Sci2003; 38(2): 201–206. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021180608531.
13.
LiQMMagkiriadisIHarriganJJ. Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J Cell Plast2006; 42(5): 371–392. DOI: 10.1177/0021955X06063519.
14.
JaouenLRenaultADevergeM. Elastic and damping characterizations of acoustical porous materials: available experimental methods and applications to a melamine foam. Appl Acoust2008; 69(12): 1129–1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.11.008.
15.
KannyKMahfuzHCarlssonLA, et al.Dynamic mechanical analyses and flexural fatigue of pvc foams. Compos Struct2002; 58(2): 175–183. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00160-5.
16.
KellerJHAltstädtV. Influence of mid-stress on the dynamic fatigue of a light weight eps bead foam. E-Polymers2019; 19(1): 349–354. DOI: 10.1515/epoly-2019-0036.
17.
MaheoLGuérardSRioG, et al.Multiaxial behavior of foams – experiments and modeling. EPJ Web Conf2015; 94: 04035. DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20159404035.
18.
BonfiglioPPompoliFHoroshenkovKV, et al.How reproducible are methods to measure the dynamic viscoelastic properties of poroelastic media?J Sound Vib2018; 428: 26–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.05.006.
19.
WeingartNRapsDKuhnigkJ, et al.Expanded polycarbonate (epc)-a new generation of high-temperature engineering bead foams. Polymers2020; 12(10): 2314. DOI: 10.3390/polym12102314.
20.
HenriquesIRRouleauLCastelloDA, et al.Viscoelastic behavior of polymeric foams: experiments and modeling. Mech Mater2020; 148: 103506. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103506.
21.
EtchessaharMSahraouiSBenyahiaL, et al.Frequency dependence of elastic properties of acoustic foams. J Acoust Soc Am2005; 117(3): 1114–1121. DOI: 10.1121/1.1857527.
22.
EhrigTModlerNKostkaP. Compression and frequency dependence of the viscoelastic shear properties of flexible open-cell foams. Polym Test2018; 70: 151–161. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.036.
EhrensteinGWRiedelGTrawielP. Dynamic mechanical analysis (dma). In: EhrensteinGWRiedelGTrawielP (eds). Thermal analysis of plastics. Munich: Hanser, 2004, pp. 236–299. DOI: 10.3139/9783446434141.006.
25.
MezgerT. The rheology handbook: for users of rotational and oscillatory rheometers. 5th revised edition ed. European coatings library, Hannover: Vincentz, 2020.
26.
KuhnigkJKrebsNStandauT, et al.Evaluation of the fusion quality of bead foams made from polybutylene terephthalate (e–pbt) depending on the processing temperature. Macromol Mater Eng2022; 307: 2200419. DOI: 10.1002/mame.202200419.
27.
CzlonkaSStrakowskaAStrzelecK, et al.Composites of rigid polyurethane foams and silica powder filler enhanced with ionic liquid. Polym Test2019; 75: 12–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.021.
28.
Di LandroLSalaGOlivieriD. Deformation mechanisms and energy absorption of polystyrene foams for protective helmets. Polym Test2002; 21(2): 217–228. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00073-3.
29.
EwoldtRHJohnstonMTCarettaLM. Experimental challenges of shear rheology: how to avoid bad data. In: Complex Fluids in Biological Systems. New York, NY: Springer, 2015, pp. 207–241. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2065-5_6
30.
ZouWWanLHanZ, et al.Effect of stress history on compressive and rheological behaviors of eps geofoam. Construct Build Mater2019; 228: 116592. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.318.
31.
DörrDRapsDKirupananthamD, et al.Expanded polyamide 12 bead foams (epa) thermo-mechanical properties of molded parts. AIP Conference Proceedings2205(1): 020037. DOI: 10.1063/1.5142952.
32.
KästnerMObstMBrummundJ, et al.Inelastic material behavior of polymers – experimental characterization, formulation and implementation of a material model. Mech Mater2012; 52: 40–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.04.011.
