Carbon particulate and controlled-hydrolysis assisted extrusion foaming of semi-crystalline polyethylene terephthalate for the enhanced thermal insulation property
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2021
Carbon particulate and controlled-hydrolysis assisted extrusion foaming of semi-crystalline polyethylene terephthalate for the enhanced thermal insulation property
This work presents a facile method to produce low-density PET foams using pristine semi-crystalline resin by moisture-induced controlled-hydrolysis in a tight processing window (moisture content ∼ 0.12 wt.%). We investigated the effect of moisture and moisture containing activated carbon (AC) on the foam expansion ratio, cell morphology, and PET resin degradation and crystallization properties. Controlled-hydrolysis increased the melt-flow rate of PET resin (intrinsic viscosity: 0.52 to 0.54 dL/g) without losing crystallinity, and thus the PET foams possess better tensile properties (∼2 MPa stress and ∼100% strain) and higher thermal stability (>200°C) than chemically modified PET foams. The foam density could be made as low as ∼ 0.15 g/cm3 using a lab scale twin-screw extruder. A strand array die was also designed to produce plate-shaped foam samples. AC allowed easier control of the moisture content and delayed resin degradation in extrusion. Both AC and micrographite (mGr) could stabilize the PET foam morphology in extrusion and serve as good infrared attenuation agents (IAAs) in a simulated housing thermal insulation experiment.
McKinsey & Company. Pathways to a low-carbon economy – version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/pathways-to-a-low-carbon-economy (2009, accessed 1 September 2013).
2.
RizviAChuRKMParkCB.Scalable fabrication of thermally insulating mechanically resilient hierarchically porous polymer foams. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 38410–38417.
3.
QinYPengQZhuY, et al. Lightweight, mechanically flexible and thermally superinsulating rGO/polyimide nanocomposite foam with an anisotropic microstructure. Nanoscale Adv2019; 1: 4895–4903.
4.
NotarioBPintoJSolorzanoE, et al. Experimental validation of the Knudsen effect in nanocellular polymeric foams. Polymer2015; 56: 57–67.
SchuetzMAGlicksmanLR.A basic study of heat transfer through foam insulation. J Cell Plast1984; 20: 114–121.
7.
GlicksmanLSchuetzMSinofskyM.Radiation heat transfer in foam insulation. Int J Heat Mass Transfer1987; 30: 187–197.
8.
CoquardRBaillisDQuenardD.Numerical and experimental study of the IR opacification of polystyrene foams for thermal insulation enhancement. Energy Build2019; 183: 54–63.
9.
SuhKWParkCPMaurerMJ, et al. Lightweight cellular plastics. Adv Mater2000; 12: 1779–1789.
10.
SuhKWYamadaMShmidtCD, et al. The Dow Chemical Company. Microcellular foams containing an infrared attenuating agent and a method of using. US Patent 5679718A, USA, 1997.
11.
LohRRFabianBABargabosSL, et al. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc. Asphalt-filled polymer foams. US Patent 7166646B2, USA, 2007.
12.
VoCVHoodLS. Dow Global Technologies LLC. Styrene acrylonitrile copolymer foam with infrared attenuating agents. US Patent 7919538B2, USA, 2011.
13.
LohRRPolaskyMERyndJP, et al. Owens Corning Intellectual Capital LLC. Polymer foams containing multi-functional layered nano-graphite. US Patent 7605188 B2, USA, 2009.
14.
KairytėAVaitkusSPundienėI, et al. Effect of propylene glycol, rapeseed glycerine, and corn starch modified polyol blends parameters on the properties of thermal insulating polyurethane foams. J Cell Plast2019; 55: 365–384.
15.
GuoZYangJWingertMJ, et al. Comparison of carbon nanofibers and activated carbon on carbon dioxide foaming of polystyrene. J Cell Plast2008; 44: 453–468.
16.
ZhangCZhuBLeeLJ.Extrusion foaming of polystyrene/carbon particles using carbon dioxide and water as co-blowing agents. Polymer2011; 52: 1847–1855.
17.
ZhangCZhuBLiD, et al. Extruded polystyrene foams with bimodal cell morphology. Polymer2012; 53: 2435–2442.
18.
GongPWangGTranM-P, et al. Advanced bimodal polystyrene/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams for thermal insulation. Carbon2017; 120: 1–10.
19.
GuoSR.The application and developmental trend of exterior wall external insulation. AMM2012; 174–177: 1367–1371.
20.
JankauskaitVMacijauskasG. Polyethylene terephthalate waste recycling and application possibilities: a review. Mater Sci (Medžiagotyra) 2008; 14(2): 119–127.
21.
GuoHNadellaKKumarV.Effect of intrinsic viscosity on solid-state microcellular foaming of polyethylene terephthalate. J Mater Res2013; 28: 2374–2379.
22.
ZhengWGLeePCParkCB. Extrusion foaming behavior of PET with CO2. In: Annual technical conference – ANTEC, conference proceedings, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 6-11 May 2007.
23.
BarzegariMRHossienyNKeshkarM, et al. Extrusion foaming behavior of PET. In: Annual technical conference – ANTEC, conference proceedings 3, Orlando, FL, United States, 2-4 April 2012, pp.2389–2393.
24.
Paul HandaYWongBZhangZ, et al. Some thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the system PETG-CO2, and morphological characteristics of the CO2-blown PETG foams. Polym Eng Sci1999; 39: 55–61.
Gómez-GómezFJArencónDSánchez-SotoMÁ, et al. Influence of the injection moulding parameters on the microstructure and thermal properties of microcellular polyethylene terephthalate glycol foams. J Cell Plast2013; 49: 47–63.
27.
XanthosMZhangQDeySK, et al. Effects of resin rheology on the extrusion foaming characteristics of PET. J Cell Plast1998; 34: 498–510.
28.
XanthosMDeySKZhangQ, et al. Parameters affecting extrusion foaming of PET by gas injection. J Cell Plast2000; 36: 102–111.
29.
XanthosMYoungM-WKarayanndisGP, et al. Reactive modification of polyethylene terephthalate with polyepoxides. Polym Eng Sci2001; 41: 643–655.
30.
DhavalikarRYamaguchiMXanthosM.Molecular and structural analysis of a triepoxide-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) from rheological data. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem2003; 41: 958–969.
31.
XanthosMWanCDhavalikarR, et al. Identification of rheological and structural characteristics of foamable poly(ethylene terephthalate) by reactive extrusion. Polym Int2004; 53: 1161–1168.
32.
YangZXinCMughalW, et al. High-melt-elasticity poly(ethylene terephthalate) produced by reactive extrusion with a multi-functional epoxide for foaming. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135: 45805.
33.
XiaTXiZYiX, et al. Melt foamability of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/clay nanocomposites prepared by extrusion blending in the presence of pyromellitic dianhydride. Ind Eng Chem Res2015; 54: 6922–6931.
34.
ZhongHXiZLiuT, et al. In-situ polymerization-modification process and foaming of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Chin J Chem Eng2013; 21: 1410–1418.
35.
XiaTXiZLiuT, et al. Melt foamability of reactive extrusion-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) with pyromellitic dianhydride using supercritical carbon dioxide as blowing agent. Polym Eng Sci2015; 55: 1528–1535.
36.
YanHYuanHGaoF, et al. Modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) by combination of reactive extrusion and followed solid-state polycondensation for melt foaming. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132: 42708.
37.
SorrentinoLIannaceSMaioED, et al. Isothermal crystallization kinetics of chain-extended PET. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys2005; 43: 1966–1972.
38.
LeeS-T.Foam extrusion: principles and practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014.
39.
HosseiniSSTaheriSZadhoushA, et al. Hydrolytic degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate). J Appl Polym Sci2007; 103: 2304–2309.
40.
LiaoRYuWZhouC.Rheological control in foaming polymeric materials: II. Semi-Crystal Polym, Polymer2010; 51: 6334–6345.
41.
ShafiMAJoshiKFlumerfeltRW.Bubble size distributions in freely expanded polymer foams. Chem Eng Sci1997; 52: 635–644.
42.
YehS-KYangJChiouN-R, et al. Introducing water as a coblowing agent in the carbon dioxide extrusion foaming process for polystyrene thermal insulation foams. Polym Eng Sci2010; 50: 1577–1584.
43.
KimJYKimSHKangSW, et al. Crystallization and melting behavior of silica nanoparticles and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) hybrid nanocomposites. Macromol Res2006; 14: 146–154.
44.
HeYFanZHuY, et al. DSC analysis of isothermal melt-crystallization, glass transition and melting behavior of poly(L-lactide) with different molecular weights. Eur Polym J2007; 43: 4431–4439.
45.
JenkinsMJHarrisonKL.The effect of molecular weight on the crystallization kinetics of polycaprolactone. Polym Adv Technol2006; 17: 474–478.
46.
HanXZengCLeeLJ, et al. Extrusion of polystyrene nanocomposite foams with supercritical CO2. Polym Eng Sci2003; 43: 1261–1275.
47.
ZengCHanXLeeLJ, et al. Polymer–clay nanocomposite foams prepared using carbon dioxide. Adv Mater2003; 15: 1743–1747.
48.
ShenJZengCLeeLJ.Synthesis of polystyrene–carbon nanofibers nanocomposite foams. Polymer2005; 46: 5218–5224.
49.
ChenLOzisikRSchadlerLS.The influence of carbon nanotube aspect ratio on the foam morphology of MWNT/PMMA nanocomposite foams. Polymer2010; 51: 2368–2375.
50.
OkamotoMNamPHMaitiP, et al. Biaxial flow-induced alignment of silicate layers in polypropylene/clay nanocomposite foam. Nano Lett2001; 1: 503–505.
51.
MacoskoCW.Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications. New York: VCH, 1994.
