Acoustic performances of silicone foams for sound absorption

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the link between the elaboration process, the microstructure and the acoustic behaviour of silicone foams obtained using a two-component silicone. Different parameters such as the ratio of components, the addition of a thinning agent and the curing temperature are varied, with the objective of understanding the influence of each parameter in the foam’s acoustic absorption. The microstructure is analysed using scanning electron microscopy and acoustic properties are measured. Two non-acoustical properties of the porous material are also investigated, namely the porosity and the flow resistivity. Pore cell size and interconnected porosity have great impact on acoustical properties. Significant enhancements of the absorption properties could be obtained in the low-frequency band by increasing the rate of agent B through an increase in the amount of interconnected porous cells. An improvement in absorption is observed in the higher frequency range when a thinning agent is added to the mixture. Representative models of the foam for acoustic simulations are obtained allowing estimation of the tortuosity, viscous and thermal characteristic length from acoustic measurements. These models are able to simulate the acoustic behaviour of the silicone foams when embedded in sound packages.

Keywords

Silicone foams porous materials acoustic properties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nugent

Blanes

Fons

et al.

Noise in Europe 2014. Eur Environ Agency 2014; 10: 1–62.

Pignier N. The impact of traffic noise on economy and environment: a short literature study: performed within the scope of the ECO2 project Noise propagation from sustainable ground vehicles. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2015.

Simon F. Acoustic porous solutions for aircrafts: interior and exterior noises. In: Symposium on the acoustics of poro-elastic materials, Stockholm, 2014. pp. 1–10.

Cherng J. Smart acoustic material for automotive applications. Annual Progress Report. Project #2005/3. Henry W. Patton Center for Engineering Education and Practice, The University of Michigan-Dearborn Henry, 2005.

Allard JF and Atalla N. Propagation of sound in porous media: modelling sound absorbing materials. Chichester: John Wiley, 2009.

Zhu

Cao

Chen

et al.

Glycolysis recycling of rigid waste polyurethane foam from refrigerators. Environ Technol 2014; 35: 2676–2684.

Ignatyev

Thielemans

Vander Beke

. Recycling of polymers: a review. ChemSusChem 2014; 7: 1579–1593.

Ridha

Shim

. Microstructure and tensile mechanical properties of anisotropic rigid polyurethane foam. Exp Mech 2008; 48: 763–776.

Deschanel

Vanel

Godin

et al.

Mechanical response and fracture dynamics of polymeric foams. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2009; 42: 214001–214001.

10.

Luo

Ren

et al.

Studies of polyvinyl alcohol/alkali lignin/silica composite foam material (PLCFM). BioResources 2015; 10: 5961–5973.

11.

Wang

Torng

. Experimental study of the absorption characteristics of some porous fibrous materials. Appl Acoust 2001; 62: 447–459.

12.

Atalla N, Amedin C, Atalla Y, et al. Development of new high acoustical performance sound absorbing materials to decrease noise at low frequencies. Tech rep A-370. Montreal (Quebec): IRSST, 2004.

13.

Doutres

Atalla

Dong

. Effect of the microstructure closed pore content on the acoustic behavior of polyurethane foams. J Appl Phys 2011; 110: 064901–064901.

14.

Zhang

et al.

Correlation between the acoustic and porous cell morphology of polyurethane foam: effect of interconnected porosity. Mater Design 2012; 41: 319–325.

15.

Basso

Pizzi

Delmotte

. A new approach to environmentally friendly protein plastics and foams. BioResources 2015; 10: 8014–8024.

16.

Jimenez

Lesaffre

Bellayer

et al.

Novel flame retardant flexible polyurethane foam: plasma induced graft-polymerization of phosphonates. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 63853–63865.

17.

Tokiwa

Calabia

Ugwu

et al.

Biodegradability of plastics. Int J Mol Sci 2009; 10: 3722–3742.

18.

Coons

McKay

Hamada

. A Bayesian analysis of the compression set and stress–strain behavior in a thermally aged silicone foam. Polym Degrad Stab 2006; 91: 1824–1836.

19.

Perrot

Chevillotte

Panneton

. Bottom-up approach for microstructure optimization of sound absorbing materials. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 124: 940–948.

20.

Matousek T, Ponizil P, Kremen F, et al. Pore size estimation. In: Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference on energy and development – Environment–Biomedicine. GEMESED’11. Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), 2011, pp. 372–377.

21.

Doutres

Atalla

Dong

. A semi-phenomenological model to predict the acoustic behavior of fully and partially reticulated polyurethane foams. J Appl Phys 2013; 113: 054901–054901.

22.

Doutres

Ouisse

Atalla

et al.

Impact of the irregular microgeometry of polyurethane foam on the macroscopic acoustic behavior predicted by a unit-cell model. J Acoust Soc Am 2014; 136: 1666–1681.

23.

Biot

. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. J Appl Phys 1962; 33: 1482–1498.

24.

Dauchez N, Etchessahar M and Sahraoui S. On measurement of mechanical properties of sound absorbing materials. In: 2nd Biot conference on poromechanics, Grenoble (France), 2002, pp. 1–4.

25.

Atalla

Panneton

. Inverse acoustical characterization of open cell porous media using impedance tube measurements. Can Acoust 2005; 33: 11–24.

26.

Lee

Spells

. Sound absorption property of platinum catalyzed silicone RTV foam. J Cell Plast 1982; 18: 174–177.

27.

Kumar

Mollah

Keshri

et al.

Development of macroporous silicone rubber for acoustic applications. Indust Eng Chem Res 2016; 55: 8751–8760.

28.

Delany

Bazley

. Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials. Appl Acoust 1970; 3: 105–116.

29.

Allard

Champoux

. New empirical equations for sound propagation in rigid frame fibrous materials. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 3346–3353.

30.

Schneider

Rasband

Eliceiri

. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 671–675.

31.

Ouisse

Ichchou

Chedly

et al.

On the sensitivity analysis of porous material models. J Sound Vibrat 2012; 331: 5292–5308.

32.

Singer

Nelder

. Nelder-mead algorithm. Scholarpedia 2009; 4: 2928–2928.

33.

Chevillotte

Perrot

Guillon

. A direct link between microstructure and acoustical macro-behavior of real double porosity foams. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 134: 4681–4690.