In this paper, two kinds of phenolic foams modified with expandable graphite and expanded graphite were prepared and the effect of particles on the mechanical properties and structure of the foams has been discussed. The mechanical properties, density and morphology of reinforced phenolic foams were studied. The images of scanning electron microscope showed that the size of the modified phenolic foams was smaller and more complete. The mean diameter of the expanded graphite-reinforced phenolic foams was smaller than that of the expandable graphite-reinforced phenolic foams due to the specific surface area of the expanded graphite. The compressive test results showed that the expandable graphite and expanded graphite could enhance the mechanical properties of the foams obviously. And the smaller cell size of the expanded graphite-reinforced foams provided them better mechanical properties. When the addition of the reinforcement reached to 0.8 wt%, the reinforced phenolic foams showed the best compression performance. The compressive strength and modulus with the 0.8 wt% expandable graphite were increased by 70% and 48% and that with the 0.8 wt% expanded graphite were increased by 80% and 69%.
AroraKALesserAJMcCarthyTJ. Preparation and characterization of microcellular polystyrene foams processed in supercritical carbon dioxide. Macromolecules1998; 31: 4614–4620.
2.
StaffordCMRussellTPMcCarthyTJ. Expansion of polystyrene using supercritical carbon dioxide: effects of molecular weight, polydispersity, and low molecular weight components. Macromolecules1999; 32: 7610–7616.
3.
Flores-JohnsonEALiQM. Indentation into polymeric foams. Int J Solids Struct2010; 47: 1987–1995.
4.
Del Saz-OrozcoBOlietMAlonsoMVet al.Formulation optimization of unreinforced and lignin nanoparticle-reinforced phenolic foams using an analysis of variance approach. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 667–674.
5.
MutluIOnerCFindikF. Boric acid effect in phenolic composites on tribological properties in brake linings. Mater Design2007; 28: 480–487.
DengDQXuL. Measurements of thermal expansion coefficient of phenolic foam at low temperatures. Cryogenics2003; 43: 465–468.
8.
JohnMJThomasS. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym2008; 71: 343–364.
9.
KuHWangHPattarachaiyakoopNet al.A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B – Eng2011; 42: 856–873.
10.
PerezEFamaLPardoSGet al.Tensile and fracture behaviour of PP/wood flour composites. Compos Part B – Eng2012; 43: 2795–2800.
JiaoLLXiaoHHWangQSet al.Thermal degradation characteristics of rigid polyurethane foam and the volatile products analysis with TG-FTIR-MS. Polym Degrad Stabil2013; 98: 2687–2696.
13.
ZengCCHossienyNZhangCet al.Synthesis and processing of PMMA carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams. Polymer2010; 51: 655–664.
14.
Del Saz-OrozcoBAlonsoMVOlietMet al.Mechanical, thermal and morphological characterization of cellulose fiber-reinforced phenolic foams. Compos Part B – Eng2015; 75: 367–372.
15.
ZhouJTYaoZJChenYXet al.Thermomechanical analyses of phenolic foam reinforced with glass fiber mat. Mater Design2013; 51: 131–135.
16.
Del Saz-OrozcoBAlonsoMVOlietMet al.Effects of formulation variables on density, compressive mechanical properties and morphology of wood flour-reinforced phenolic foams. Compos Part B – Eng2014; 56: 546–552.
17.
SongSAChungYSKimSS. The mechanical and thermal characteristics of phenolic foams reinforced with carbon nanoparticles. Compos Sci Technol2014; 103: 85–93.
18.
ZhaoGDaiCLZhangYHet al.Enhanced foam stability by adding comb polymer gel for in-depth profile control in high temperature reservoirs. Colloid Surf A2015; 482: 115–124.
19.
FockeWWBadenhorstHMhikeWet al.Characterization of commercial expandable graphite fire retardants. Thermochim Acta2014; 584: 8–16.
20.
ChenGHWuCLWengWGet al.Preparation of polystyrene/graphite nanosheet composite. Polymer2003; 44: 1781–1784.
21.
SinghVJoungDZhaiLet al.Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mater Sci2011; 56: 1178–1271.
22.
YunYSBaeYHKimDHet al.Reinforcing effects of adding alkylated graphene oxide to polypropylene. Carbon2011; 49: 3553–3559.
23.
KunPTapasztoOWeberFet al.Determination of structural and mechanical properties of multilayer graphene added silicon nitride-based composites. Ceram Int2012; 38: 211–216.
LiYZouJZhouSTet al.Effect of expandable graphite particle size on the flame retardant, mechanical, and thermal properties of water-blown semi-rigid polyurethane foam. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 131: 39885–39894.
26.
YousefzadeOHemmatiFGarmabiHet al.Assisted heterogeneous multinucleation and bubble growth in semicrystalline ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer/expanded graphite nanocomposite foams: control of morphology and viscoelastic properties. Express Polym Lett2015; 9: 932–944.
27.
LeungSNWongAWangLCet al.Mechanism of extensional stress-induced cell formation in polymeric foaming processes with the presence of nucleating agents. J Supercrit Fluid2012; 63: 187–198.
28.
LiJYuKQianKet al.One-step synthesis of graphene nanoplatelets/SiO2 hybrid materials with excellent toughening performance. Polym Compos2015; 36: 907–912.
29.
YangZJYuanLLGuYZet al.Improvement in mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foam reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 130: 1479–1488.
30.
ZhouJTYaoZJChenYXet al.Fabrication and mechanical properties of phenolic foam reinforced with graphene oxide. Polym Compos2014; 35: 581–586.
31.
ZhuangZHHeBYangZG. Preparation and characterisation of phenolic foam/HTAB-ATP nanocomposites. Plast Rubber Compos2010; 39: 460–464.
