Production and characterization of epoxy syntactic foams highly loaded with thermoplastic microballoons

Abstract

Glass microballoon syntactic foams consisting of 60–70 vol% hollow glass microballoons and epoxy resin matrix have gained considerable attention in recent years due to their unique combination of mechanical properties and low density, with applications in the naval and aerospace industries. An important limitation of these materials is the volume fraction ceiling (∼0.74) and subsequent density limit (0.36 g/cm³). Utilizing thermoplastic microballoons, syntactic foams were produced with densities as low as 0.067 g/cm³, achieved by developing a method that produces epoxy/microballoon compositions comprising an unusually high volume fraction of microballoons (0.75–0.95). The resulting morphology features microballoons which, having expanded in a restricted volume, are deformed into irregular shapes that efficiently pack together and are encapsulated by a thin coating of epoxy. The compressive yield strength, tensile strength and initial modulus of these highly loaded syntactic foams exhibit a non-linear decrease with increasing microballoon volume fraction to values typical of highly porous polymers, but display a high degree of recovery, or rebound, from large compressive strain compared with glass microballoon syntactic foams.

Keywords

Thermoset foams mechanical testing foam density compression behaviors syntactic foam

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gupta

Woldesenbet

Sankaran

. Studies on compressive failure features in syntactic foam material. J Mater Sci 2001; 36: 4485–4491.

Gupta

Woldesenbet

. Hygrothermal studies on syntactic foams and compressive strength determination. Compos Struct 2003; 61: 311–320.

Gupta

. A functionally graded syntactic foam material for high energy absorption under compression. Mater Lett 2007; 61: 979–982.

Gupta

Nagorny

. Tensile properties of glass microballoon-epoxy resin syntactic foams. J Appl Polym Sci 2006; 102: 1254–1261.

Colloca

Gupta

Porfiri

. Tensile properties of carbon nanofiber reinforced multiscale syntactic foams. Compos Part B 2013; 44: 584–591.

Karthikeyan

Sankaran

. Elastic behaviour of plain and fibre-reinforced syntactic foams under compression. Mater Lett 2004; 58: 995–999.

d'Almeida

JRM

. An analysis of the effect of the diameters of glass microspheres on the mechanical behavior of glass-microsphere/epoxy-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 1999; 59: 2087–2091.

Hodge AJ. Mechanical property allowables generated for the solid rocket booster composite nose cap. Report no. NASA/TM 2000-210252, NASA, USA, 2000.

Watkins L. Syntactic foam buoyancy for production risers. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on offshore mechanical and artic engineering, Houston, Texas, 7–12 February 1988.

10.

Bibin

Reghunadhan-Nair

Ninan

. Low-density phenolic syntactic foams: Processing and properties. Cell Polym 2007; 26: 229–229.

11.

Gupta

Woldesenbet

Mensah

. Compression properties of syntactic foams: effect of cenosphere radius ratio and specimen aspect ratio. Compos Part A 2004; 35: 103–111.

12.

Wouterson

. Specific properties and fracture toughness of syntactic foam: effect of foam microstructures. Compos Sci Technol 2005; 65: 1840–1850.

13.

Sass JP. Thermal performance comparison of glass microsphere and perlite insulation systems for liquid hydrogen storage tanks. In: AIP conference proceedings, Chattanooga, Tennessee, 16–20 July 2007.

14.

Allen

. Advances in microsphere insulation systems. Adv Cryog Eng 2003; 49: 619–626.

15.

Scholtens BE, Fesmire JE and Sass JP. Cryogenic thermal performance testing of bulk-fill and aerogel insulation materials. In: AIP conference proceedings, Chattanooga, Tennessee, 16–20 July 2007.

16.

Farr

Groot

. Close packing density of polydisperse hard spheres. J Chem Phys 2009; 131: 244104–244104.

17.

Song

Wang

Makse

. A phase diagram for jammed matter. Nature 2008; 453.7195: 629–632.

18.

. Modeling and characterization of two-phase composites by Voronoi diagram in the Laguerre geometry based on random close packing of spheres. Comput Mater Sci 2010; 47: 951–961.

19.

Whinnery L, Goods S and Even B. Expancel foams: fabrication and characterization of a new reduced density cellular material for structural applications. No. SAND2000-8217. Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (US); Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (US), 2000.

20.

Zhang

Wang

Fan

. Study on the preparation of epoxy foam used for electrical sealing compound. J Aeronaut Mater 2003; 23: 186–190.

21.

Wang

. The compressive properties of expandable microspheres/epoxy foams. Compos Part B 2014; 56: 724–732.

22.

ASTM D695-15. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.

23.

ASTM D1623-09. Standard test method for tensile and tensile adhesion properties of rigid cellular plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.

24.

Akzo Nobel. Technical Bulletin, Product Specifications for Expancel Microspheres, 2016.

25.

Stirna

et al.

Structure and properties of polyurethane foams obtained from rapeseed oil polyols. Proc Est Acad Sci 2006; 55: 101–101.

26.

Gupta

. A functionally graded syntactic foam material for high energy absorption under compression. Mater Lett 2007; 61: 979–982.