Native and modified starches from non-conventional sources could be used as raw materials that represent appropriate bio-matrices to support diverse bioactive substances when formulating composite edible films or foams. In order to be used as raw materials, the starch and the starch-based films or foams obtained have to be characterized. The goals of this study were first, to isolate the starch from the edible portion of Dioscorea trifida, a sub-utilized agricultural commodity of the Venezuelan Amazons; second, to modify by cross-linking the native starch already isolated with sodium trimetaphosphate; third, to produce edible films with both the native and modified starches; and finally to characterize both while comparing their functional properties and proposing them to be utilized to produce foams. The bio-matrices represented by native and modified starches were used to formulate films with 5% of D. trifida starch and 1.5% glycerol. A native D. trifida starch with high purity was obtained, as well as a cross-linked modified starch with a 0.002% of degree of substitution. Significant statistical differences in the film thickness, color profile, deformation, and stress to puncture were found in both types of films. The modified starch-based films exhibited higher width and opalescence than those formed with native starch. The water vapor permeability, water retention, and water solubility differed also between both bio-matrices. The results suggested, in spite of these differences, that both of them could be proposed for gasification in order to obtain foams.
LópezOVLecotCJZaritzkyNE. Biodegradable packages development from starch based heat sealable films. J Food Eng2011; 105(2): 254–263.
8.
VilladaHSAcostaHAVelascoRJ. Biopolímeros naturales usados en empaques biodegradables Revisión Bibliográfica. Temas Agrarios2007; 12(2): 5–13.
9.
PimpaBMuhammadKGhazaliZ. Optimization of conditions for production of sago starch-based foam. Carbohydr Polym2007; 68(4): 751–760.
10.
BénézetJ-CStanojlovic-DavidovicABergeretA. Mechanical and physical properties of expanded starch, reinforced by natural fibres. Ind Crops Prod2012; 37(1): 435–440.
11.
UsluM-KPolatS. Effects of glyoxal cross-linking on baked starch foam. Carbohydr Polym2012; 87(3): 1994–1999.
12.
HannaJ. Functional properties of extruded foam composites of starch acetate and corn cob fiber. Ind Crops Prod2004; 19: 255–269.
13.
KulinskiZPiorkowskaE. Crystallization, structure and properties of plasticized poly (Lactide). Polymer2005; 46(23): 10290–10300.
14.
GuanJHannaMA. Selected morphological and functional of extruded acetylated starch–cellulose foams. Bioresour Technol2006; 97(14): 1716–1726.
15.
HanJHGennadiosAEdible films and coatings: a review. In: HanJH (ed.) Innovations in food packaging. Food Science and Technology, International Series, San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 2005; 239–259.
16.
HernándezOEmaldiUTovarJ. In vitro digestibility of edible films from various starch sources. Carbohydr Polym2008; 71: 648–655.
17.
Rojas-GraüMATapiaMSMartín-BellosoO. Empleo de recubrimientos comestibles en frutas frescas cortadas: nuevo enfoque de conservación y desarrollo de productos. Alimentaria2007; 38: 105–118.
18.
Pérez SiraEGibertOSabateA. Physicochemical, functional, and macromolecular properties of waxy yam starches discovered from “mapuey” (Dioscorea trifida) genotypes in the venezuelan amazon. J Agric Food Chem2011; 59: 263–273.
19.
LimSSeibPA. Preparation and pasting properties of wheat and corn starch phosphates. Cereal Chem1993; 70(2): 137–143.
20.
Romero-BastidasCBello-PérezLAGarcíaM. Physicochemical and micro-structural characterization of films prepared by thermal and cold gelatinization from non-conventional sources of starches. Carbohydr Polym2005; 60: 235–244.
21.
AACC. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. Methods no. 44-15A, 08-01, 46-13, 02-52 and 02-31, 2003. St Paul, MN, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemists.
22.
SchochTJFatty substances in starch. In: WhistlerRL (ed.) Methods in carbohydrates1964; Vol. IV: New York, NY, USA: Academic Press56–61 and 101–103.
23.
McGranceSJCornellHJRixJC. A simple and rapid colorimetric method for the determination of amylose in starch products. Starch/Stärke1998; 50(4): 158–163.
24.
MestresCMatencioFPonsB. A rapid method for the determination of amylose content by using differential scanning calorimetry. Starch/Stärke1996; 48(1): 2–6.
25.
AmaniN’GGDufourDMestresC. Variability in starch physicochemical and functional properties of yam (Dioscorea sp.) cultivated in Ivory Coast. J Sci Food Agric2004; 84: 2085–2096.Erratum. J Sci Food Agric 2005; 85: 889.
26.
DeetaePShobsngobSVaranyanondW. Preparation, pasting properties and freeze–thaw stability of dual modified crosslink-phosphorylated rice starch. Carbohydr Polym2008; 73: 351–358.
HsuaC-LChenWWengY-M. Chemical composition, physical properties, and antioxidant activities of yam flours as affected by different drying methods. Food Chem2003; 83: 85–92.
Rojas-GraüMATapiaMSMartin-BellosoO. Using polysaccharide-based edible coatings to maintain quality. LWT – Food Sci Technol2008; 41: 139–147.
31.
YangLPaulsonAT. Mechanical and water vapour barrier properties of edible gellan films. Food Res Int2000; 33: 563–570.
32.
ASTM E96-95:1995. Methods for water transmission of materials, ASTM International.
33.
RhimJW. Physical and mechanical properties of water resistant sodium alginate films. Lebensm Wiss u Technol2004; 37: 323–330.
34.
TeitelbaumRCRubySLMarksTJ. A resonance Raman/iodine Moessbauer investigation of the starch-iodine structure. Aqueous solution and iodine vapor preparations. J Am Chem Soc1980; 102(10): 3322–3328.
35.
FDA US Federal Drug Administration. CFR-code of federal regulations. Title 21. Part 172, Food additives permitted for direct addition to food for human consumption. Subpart I: Multipurpose additives. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration, 2011. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=172.892.
36.
MyllärinenPPartanenRSeppälaJ. Effect of glycerol on behavior of amylose and amylopectin films. Carbohydr Polym2002; 50: 355–361.
McHughTHAvena-BustillosRJKrochtaJM. Hydrophilic edible films: modified procedure for water vapor permeability and explanation of thickness effects. J Food Sci1993; 58(4): 899–903.
39.
SwartzbergHGModeling of gas vapor transport through hydrophilic films. In: MathlouthiM (ed.) Food packaging and preservation, New York, NY, USA: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1986; 115–135.
40.
BourtoomT. Edible films and coatings: characteristics and properties (Review article). Int Food Res J2008; 15(3): 237–248.
41.
MaliSGrossmannMVGarciaMA. Barrier, mechanical and optical properties of plasticized yam starch films. Carbohydr Polym2004; 56: 129–135.
42.
LópezOGarcíaMAZaritzkyNE. Film forming capacity of chemically modified corn starches. Carbohydr Polym2008; 73: 573–581.
43.
SothornvitRKrochtaJM. Plasticizer effect on oxygen permeability of β-lactoglobulin films. J Food Eng2000; 50: 149–155.
44.
CooperAKennedyMW. Biofoams and natural protein surfactants. Biophys Chem2010; 151: 96–104.
