A hybrid numerical-experimental approach is proposed to characterize the macroscopic mechanical behavior of structured polymers. The method is based on capturing the details of the material's microstructure using 3D X-ray Computed Tomography (CT). By employing segmentation and voxel-conversion, the reconstructed volume is automatically converted into a finite element model that is subsequently used for mechanical analyses. The approach is demonstrated on a 2D polycarbonate (PC) honeycomb. An ideal representative volume element (RVE), with a volume equivalent to the volume of the real X-ray CT-based model, is used to determine the dependence of the macroscopic response of the structure on intrinsic material behavior, strain rate, and cell wall thickness. A nonlinear elasto-viscoplastic constitutive model is used to describe the intrinsic behavior of the PC base material and a comparison with a hyperelastic material model reveals that local plastic deformation significantly influences the macroscopic behavior. A cubic relation between the stiffness of the structure and cell wall thickness is found, whereas the strain rate has a minor influence. The ideal RVE shows a different response compared to the real X-ray CT-based model due to local variations of the cell wall thickness in the latter, causing nonhomogeneous deformations. In addition to the geometric imperfections, jagged edges, as a consequence of voxel conversion, contribute to this local variation in cell wall thickness.
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1999). Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties. 2nd edn, University Press, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2.
van Melick, H.G.H., Govaert, L.E., and Meijer, H.E.H. (2003). Localisation Phenomena in Glassy Polymers: Influence of Thermal and Mechanical History, Polymer, 44: 3579-3591.
3.
Meijer, H.E.H. and Govaert, L.E. (2003). Multi-scale Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Amorphous Polymer Systems, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 204: 274-288.
4.
Yang, L.M. and Shim, V.P.W. (2004). A Visco-hyperelastic Constitutive Description of Elastomeric Foam, International Journal of Impact Engineering , 30: 1099-1110.
5.
Ehlers, W. and Markert, B. (2003). A Macroscopic Finite Strain Model for Cellular Polymers, International Journal of Plasticity, 19: 961-976.
6.
Deshpande, V.S. and Fleck, N.A. (2000). Isotropic Constitutive Models for Metallic Foams, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 48: 1253-1283.
7.
Deshpande, V.S. and Fleck, N.A. (2001). Multi-axial Yield Behaviour of Polymer Foams, Acta Materialia, 49: 1859-1866.
8.
Zhang, J., Lin, Z., Wong, A., Kikuchi, N., Li, V.C., Yee, A.F. and Nusholtz, G.S. (1997). Constitutivemodeling and Material Characterization of Polymeric Foams, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology , 119: 284-291.
9.
Zhang, J., Kikuchi, N., Li, V., Yee, A. and Nusholtz, G. (1998). Constitutive modeling of polymeric Foam Material Subjected to Dynamic Crash Loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 21: 369-386.
10.
Gong, L., Kyriakides, S. and Jang, W.Y. (2005). Compressive Response of Open-cell Foams, Part I: Morphology and Elastic Properties, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42: 1355-1379.
11.
Gong, L. and Kyriakides, S. (2005). Compressive Response of Open-cell Foams, Part II: Initiation and Evolution of Crushing, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42: 1381-1399.
12.
Mills, N.J. (2007). The High Strain Mechanical Response of the Wet Kelvin Model for Open-cell Foams, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44: 51-65.
13.
van der Burg, M.W.D., Shulmeister , V., van der Geissen, E. and Marissen, R. (1997). On the Linear Elastic Properties of Regular and Random Open-cell Foam Models, Journal of Cellular Plastics , 33: 31-54.
14.
Harders, H., Hupfer, K. and J. (2005). Rösler, Influence of Cell Wall Shape and Density on the Behaviour of 2d Foam Structures , Acta Materialia, 53: 1335-1345.
15.
Li, K., Gao, X.-L. and Subhash, G. (2005). Effects of Cell Shape and cell Wall Thickness Variations on the Elastic Properties of Two-dimensional Cellular Solids, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42: 1777-1795.
16.
Roberts, A.P. and Garboczi, E.J. (2002). Elastic Properties of Model Random Three-dimensional Open-cell Solids, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 50: 33-55.
17.
Saadatfar, M., Arns, C.H., Knackstedt, M.A. and Senden, T. (2004). Mechanical and Transport Properties of Polymeric Foams Derived from 3d Images, Colloids and Surfaces A, 263: 284-289.
18.
Maire, E., Fazekas, A., Salvo, L., Dendievel, R., Youssef, S., Cloetens, P. and Letang, J.M. (2003). X-Ray Tomography Applied to the Characterization of Cellular Materials, Related Finite Element Modeling Problems, Composites Science and Technology, 63: 2431-2443.
19.
Van Rietbergen, B., Huiskes, R., Eckstein, F. and Rüegsegger, P. (2003). Trabecular Bone Tissue Strains in the Healthy and Osteoporotic Human Femur, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 18: 1781-1788.
20.
Ulrich, D., Van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H. and Rüegsegger, P. (1998). Finite Element Analysis of Trabecular Bone Structure: A Comparison of Image-based Meshing Techniques, Journal of Biomechanics, 31: 1187-1192.
21.
Van Cleynenbreugel, T., Schrooten, J., Van Oosterwyck , H. and Vander Sloten, J. (2006). Micro-ct-based Screening of Biomechanical and Structural Properties of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 44: 517-525.
22.
Babin, P., Della Valle, G., Dendievel, R., Lassoued, N. and Salvo, L. (2005). Mechanical Properties of Bread Crumbs from Tomography Based Finite Element Simulations, Journal of Materials Science , 40: 5867-5873.
23.
Guldberg, R.E. , Hollister, S.J. and Charras, G.T. (1998). The Accuracy of Digital Image-based Finite Element Models, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 120: 289-295.
24.
Boyd, S.K. and Müller, R. (2006). Smooth Surface Meshing for Automated Finite Element Model Generation from 3d Image Data, Journal of Biomechanics , 39: 1287-1295.
25.
Klompen, E.T.J. , Engels, T.A.P., Govaert, L.E. and Meijer, H.E.H. (2005). Modeling of the Postyield Response of Glassy Polymers: Influence of Thermomechanical History, Macromolecules, 38: 6997-7008.
26.
Papka, S.D. and Kyriakides, S. (1998). In-plane Crushing of a Polycarbonate Honeycomb , International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35: 239-267.
27.
Papka, S.D. and Kyriakides, S. (1999). Biaxial Crushing of Honeycombs-Part I: Experiments , International Journal of Solids and Structures, 36: 4367-4396.
28.
Papka, S.D. and Kyriakides, S. (1999). In-plane Biaxial Crushing of Honeycombs-Part II: Analysis, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 36: 4397-4423.
29.
Chung, J. and Waas, A.M. (1999). Compressive Response and Failure of Circular Cell Polycarbonate Honeycombs Under Inplane Uniaxial Stresses, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 121: 494-502.
30.
MSC Marc Volume A: Theory and Userinformation, 2006.
31.
Belytschko, T., Lui, W.K. and Moran, B. (2000). Nonlinear Finite Elements For Continua and Structures , John Willy & Sons Ltd., England.
32.
Kouznetsova, V.G., Brekelmans, W.A.M. and Baaijens , F.P.T. (2001). Approach to Micro-macro Modeling of Heterogeneous Materials, Computational Mechanics, 27: 37-48.
33.
Tervoort, T.A. , Klompen, E.T.J. and Govaert , L.E. (1996). A multi-mode Approach to Finite, Three-Dimensional, Nonlinear Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Glasses, Journal of Rheology, 40: 779-797.
34.
Govaert, L.E. , Timmermans, P.H.M. and Brekelmans , W.A.M. (2000). The Influence of Intrinsicstrain Softening on Strain Localization in Polycarbonate: Modeling and Experimental Validation, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 122: 177-185.
35.
Tervoort, T.A. , Smit, R.J.M., Brekelmans , W.A.M. and Govaert, L.E. (1998). A Constitutive Equation for the Elasto-viscoplastic Deformation of Glassy Polymer, Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 1: 269-291.
36.
Fenner, R.T. (1999). Mechanics of Solids, CRC Press , Florida.
