Mechanical Behavior of Hybrid Composite Phenolic Foam

Abstract

Hybrid composite phenolic foams are reinforced with chopped glass and aramid fibers in varied proportions. The mechanical properties are measured and compared with those of foams reinforced with only aramid and glass fibers. The compression and shear properties of the hybrid reinforced foams are also compared with those of commercial polyurethane foams. The reinforced hybrid phenolic foams exhibit greater resistance to cracking and are significantly stiffer and stronger than foams with only glass and Nomex^® fibers. In general, the mechanical properties of reinforced hybrid phenolic foams are comparable to that of commercial polyurethane foam of equivalent density. The experimentally observed compressive properties (compression modulus) of reinforced phenolic foam with different fiber loading have been compared with existing theories of reinforcement. Composite models such as parallel, series, Halpin—Tsai, and the Hirsch model have been evaluated to fit the experimental data. The findings presented here, coupled with earlier results, demonstrate the potential use of hybrid composite foams as a low-cost engineering material that is tough, strong, and fire retardant.

Keywords

foams glass fibers aramid fibers mechanical properties.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Martin, Y.M.C. , Wang, X. , Schultheisz , C.R. and He , J. (2005). Prediction and Three-dimensional Monte-Carlo Simulation for Tensile Properties of Unidirectional Hybrid Composites , Comp. Sci. Tech., 65(11—12): 1719— 1727.

Prem, E.J.B. , Savithri, S. , Pillai , U.T.S. and Pai , B.C. (2005). Micromechanical Modeling of Hybrid Composites, Polymer, 46(18): 7478—7484.

Shan, Y. and Liao, K. (2002). Environmental Fatigue Behavior and Life Prediction of Unidirectional Glass—carbon/epoxy Hybrid Composites, Int. J. Fatigue, 24(8): 847—859.

Idicula, M. , Neelakantan, N.R. , Oommen, Z. , Joseph, K. and Thomas, S. (2005). A Study of the Mechanical Properties of Randomly Oriented Short Banana and Sisal Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Polyester Composites , J. App. Poly. Science, 96(5): 1699—1709.

Shao-Yun, F. , Yiu-Wing, M. , Lauke , B. and Chee-Yoon, Y. (2002). Synergistic Effect on the Fracture Toughness of Hybrid Short Glass Fiber and Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. (A), 323(1—2): 326—335.

Mao, J. , Chang, J. , Chen, Y. and Fang, D. (1998). Review of Phenolic Foam, Chem. Ind. Eng., 15(3): 38—43.

Shen, H. , Lavoie, A.J. and Nutt, S.R. (2003). Enhanced Peel Resistance of Fiber Reinforced Phenolic Foams, Comp. A: Appl. Sci. Manufact., 34(10): 941—948.

Knop, A. and Scheip, W. (1979). Chemistry and Application of Phenolic Resins, Springer, New York.

Takanori, K. (1993). JP 05-286069.

10.

Manabu, H. (1993). JP 05-318506.

11.

Halpin, J.C. and Kardos, J.L. (1972). Moduli of Crystalline Polymers Employing Composite Theory, J. Appl. Phys., 43(5): 2235—2241.

12.

Cohen, M.I. (1994). WO 94/04604.

13.

Nutt, S.R. and Shen, H. (2005). US Patent 6,841,584.

14.

Boeing Part Specification (BPS) D124. (1991 ). Air, Panels and Plenum Insulation, Rigid Plastic Foam, for Low Pressure Systems, Boeing.

15.

Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Cambridge, UK.

16.

Technical Guide of Nomex® Brand Fiber (2002 ). Technical information, DuPont.

17.

Lauscha Fiber International (2002). Technical data sheet.

18.

Shen, H. , Nutt, S.R. and Hull, D. (2004). Direct Observation and Measurement of Fiber Architecture in Short Fiber-polymer Composite Foam through Micro-CT Imaging, Comp. Sci. Tech., 64(13—14): 2113—2120.

19.

Zenkert, D. (1995). An Introduction to Sandwich Construction, Chamelon , London.

20.

Shen, H. and Nutt, S.R. (2003). Mechanical Characterization of Short Fiber Reinforced Phenolic Foam, Comp. Part A, 34(9): 899—906.

21.

Kaynak, C. , Arikan, A. and Tincer, T. (2003). Flexibility Improvement of Short Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy by using a Liquid Elastomer, Polymer, 44(8): 2433—2439.

22.

Vaikhanski, L. and Nutt, S.R. (2003). Fiber-reinforced Composite Foam from Expandable PVC Microspheres, Comp. Part A, 34(12): 1245—1253.

23.

Broek, D. (1982). Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 469.

24.

FR-6700® Series Foam Product (2004 ). General Plastics Manufacturing Company.

25.

Robinson, I.M. and Robinson, J.M. (1994). The Influence of Fiber Aspect Ratio on the Deformation of Discontinuous Fiber-reinforced Composites , J. Mater. Sci., 29(18): 4663—4677.

26.

Sarasua, J.R. , Remiro, P.M. and Pouyet, J. (1995). The Mechanical Behavior of PEEK Short Fiber Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 30(13): 3501—3508.

27.

Radesh Kumar, C. , George, K.E. and Thomas, S. (1996). Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Elastomers from Nylon-nitrile Rubber Blends, J. Appl. Poly. Sci., 61(13): 2383—2396.

28.

Halpin, J.C. and Tsai, S.W. (1967). Effects of Environmental Factors on Composite Materials, Rep. No: AFML-TR-67-423, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

29.

Rosen, B.W. (1965). Fiber Composite Materials , American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, p. 58.

30.

Hirsch, T.J. (1962). J. Am. Con. Inst., 59: 427—451.

31.

Kalaprasad, G. , Joseph, K. and Thomas, S. (1997). Theoretical Modelling of Tensile Properties of Short Sisal Fiber-reinforced Low-density Polyethylene Composites, J. Mat. Sci., 32(16): 4261—4267.

32.

Hyer, M.W. and White, S.R. (1998). Stress Analysis of Fiber-reinforced Composite Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York .

33.

Mendez, P. and Ordonez, F. (2005), Scaling Laws from Statistical Data and Dimensional Analysis, J. Appl. Mech., 72: 648—657.