Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Graphical presentation of quantitative data within corporate annual reports has become one of the techniques used by management to disclose quantitative information. The purposes of the paper are (a) to review the normative advan tages and limitations of graphs in corporate reporting, and (b) to extend our knowledge about the presentation of annual report chart graphics by examining Asian (Hong Kong) data. Two surveys of chart graphics were undertaken: 140 annual reports for 1992-1993 and 114 for 1994-1995. It was found that 38% and 35% of companies respectively for each of the two time periods include chart graphics. However, the second survey found the surprising and disturbing result that the construction techniques used in approximately half of all graphs violate sound principles and are therefore misleading. Because misleading graphs occur across all industrial sectors, violations may be the result of preparer ignorance and carelessness rather than wilful manipulation to deceive. Without objective evidence about this, professional management and accountancy organizations probably need not yet draft construction guidelines for annual report preparers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beattie, V. , & Jones, M.J. (1992). The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports: Theoretical framework and empirical study. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 291-303.

Beattie, V. , & Jones, M. (1994). An empirical study of graphical format choices in charity annual reports. Financial Accountability and Management , 10(3), 215-236.

Blocher, E. , Moffie, R.P. , & Zmud, R.W. (1986). Report format and task complexity: Interaction in risk judgments. Accounting Organizations and Society, 11, 457-470.

Brown, P.A. (1992). The relationship between graphic aids in a business report and decision-making and cognitive style of a report reader. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 34(2), 63-76.

Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants ( 1993). Using ratios and graphics in financial reporting. Research Report, Toronto, Canada, pp. 222+.

Carey, J.M. , & White, E.H. (1991). The effects of graphical versus numerical response on the accuracy of graph-based forecasts. Journal of Management , 17(1), 77-96.

Chan, C.H. , Chan, Y.H. , & Cheng, Y.F. (1996). The incidence and construction propriety of graphical disclosure in Hong Kong annual reports. Unpublished report, Department of Accountancy, City University of Hong Kong.

DeSanctis, G. (1984). Computer graphics as decision aids: Directions for research. Decision Sciences, 15, 463-487.

DeSanctis, G. , & Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1989). Graphical investigation of accounting data for financial forecasting: An experimental investigation . Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 14, 509-525.

10.

Friend, D. (1982). The new promise of graphic information systems . Financial Executive, 50, 20-26.

11.

Gibson, C.H. , & Schroeder, N. (1990). Improving your practice — graphically! CPA Journal, 60(8), 28-37.

12.

Holmes, G. (1984). How to present your message graphically. Accountancy, 95, 64-71.

13.

Johnson, J.R. , Rice, R.R. , & Roemmich, R.A. (1980). Pictures that lie: The use and abuse of graphs in annual reports. Management Accounting , 62, 50-56.

14.

Libby, R. , & Lewis, B.L. (1977). Human information processing research in accounting: The state of the art. Accounting, Organizations, and Society , 2, 245-268.

15.

Smith, L.M. , & Bain, C.E. (1987). Computer graphics for today's accountant. CPA Journal, 57, 18-35.

16.

Steinbart, P.J. (1989). The auditor's responsibility for the accuracy of graphs in annual reports: Some evidence of the need for additional guidance . Accounting Horizons, 3(3), 60-70.

17.

Taylor, B.G. , & Anderson, L.K. (1986). Misleading graphs: guidelines for the accountant. Journal of Accountancy, 162(4), 126-135.

18.

Tufte, E.R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information . Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

19.

Vogel, D. , Lehman, J. , & Dickson, G. (1987). The impact of graphical displays on persuasion: An empirical study. St. Louis: Enertronics Software Company.

Corporate Annual Report Graphical Communication in Hong Kong: Effective or Misleading?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References