This article reports on the communication strategies that sports shoe giant Nike used to successfully protect its corporate social responsibility (CSR) reputation during the late 1990s. The article opens with a brief discussion of CSR and its critical importance to transnationals such as Nike. The opening also includes four research questions guiding this study. The article then discusses why frame analysis offers such a potentially rich approach to analyzing public relations controversies like this one. The Analysis section of the article examines how an anti-Nike coalition initially succeeded in imposing negative frames on two CSR issues and how this framing generated highly negative media coverage. The remainder of this section provides a detailed commentary on eight Web texts from Nikebiz. com and how the framing strategy behind these texts enabled the company ultimately to defend, even to enhance its CSR reputation.
Andsager, J.L. ( 2000). How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly , 77, 577-592.
Arts, W., Hermkens, P., & Van Wijck, P. ( 1991). Income and the idea of justice: Principles, judgments and their framing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 121-143.
4.
Bedbury, S., & Fenichell, S. ( 2002). A new brand world: 8 principles for achieving brand leadership in the 21st century. New York, NY: Viking.
5.
Benford, R.S., & Snow, D.A. ( 2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
6.
Berger, J.K., Hertog, J.K., & Park, D.J. ( 2002). The political role and influence of business organizations: A communication perspective. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 26, pp. 160-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Boje, D.M. ( 2001). The sexual politics of sneakers: "Common ground" and absent referent stories in the Nike debate. Organization & Environment, 40, 356-363.
8.
Bowen, H. ( 1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
9.
Buchholtz, A.K., & Carroll, A.B. ( 2008). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (7th ed.). Mason, OH: Southwestern Cengage Learning.
10.
Carroll, A.B. ( 1991, July-August). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders-Balancing economic, legal, and social responsibilities. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48.
11.
Conaway, R.N., & Wardrope, W.J. (2010). Do their words really matter? Thematic analysis of U.S. and Latin American CEO letters. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 141-168.
12.
Cone Inc. (2004). 2004 Cone Corporate Citizenship Study. Retrieved from http://www.coneinc.com/Pages/pr_30.html
13.
Entman, R.M. ( 1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
14.
Entman, R.M. ( 2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power . Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163-173.
15.
Fairhurst, G.T., & Sarr, R.A. ( 1996). The art of framing: Managing the language of leadership . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
16.
Fiss, P.C., & Hirsch, P.M. ( 2005). The discourse of globalization: Framing and sense-making of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review, 70, 29-52.
17.
Fombrun, C.J., & Van Riel, C. ( 2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gamson, W.A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. Braungart & M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
Gitlin, T. ( 1980). The world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Goffman, E. ( 1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Goldman, R., & Papson, S. ( 1998). Nike culture: The sign of the swoosh. London, England: Sage.
23.
Hall, S. ( 1975). The "structured communication" of events. In S. Hall (Ed.), Getting the message across: An inquiry into success and failures of cross-cultural communication in the contemporary world (pp. 115-145). Paris, France: UNESCO Press.
24.
Hallahan, K. ( 1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations . Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 205-242.
25.
Heath, R.L. ( 2002). Issues management: Its past, present and future . Journal of Public Affairs, 2, 209-214.
26.
Hollender, J., & Fenichell, S. ( 2004). What matters most: How a small group of pioneers is teaching social responsibility to big business, and why big business is listening. New York, NY: Basic Books.
27.
Holtz, S. ( 2002). Public relations on the Net: Winning strategies to inform and influence the media, the investment community, the government, the public, and more. New York, NY: Amacom.
28.
Iyengar, S. ( 1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Johnson-Cartee, K.S. ( 2005). News narratives and news framing: Constructing political reality. London, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
31.
Kang, S. ( 2003, September 15). Nike settles case with an activist for $1.5 million. The Wall Street Journal, p. A10.
32.
Kendall, D. ( 2005). Framing class: Media representations of wealth and poverty in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
Klandermans, B. ( 1992). The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In A. Moriss & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 77-103). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Klein, N. ( 2000). No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies. New York, NY: Picador Press.
35.
Knight, G., & Greenberg, J. ( 2002). Promotionalism and subpolitics. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 541-571.
36.
Levin, I.P., & Chapman, D.P. ( 1990). Risk taking, frame of reference and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 421-434.
37.
Manheim, J.B. ( 2001). The death of a thousand cuts: Corporate campaigns and the attack on the corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
McCaffery, E.J., Kahneman, D.J., & Spitzer, M.L. ( 1995). Framing the jury: Cognitive perspectives on pain and suffering awards. Virginia Law Review, 81, 1341-1405.
39.
McHale, J.P., Zompetti, J.P., & Moffitt, M.A. ( 2007). A hegemonic model of crisis communication: Truthfulness and repercussions for free speech in Kasky v. Nike. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 374-402.
40.
Nike. (n.d.). Investors: Annual report & proxy: Fiscal year 2003 annual report: Chairman’s Letter. Retrieved from www.nike.com/nikebiz
41.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.M. ( 2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation . In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Pavlik, J.V. ( 2001). News framing and new media: Digital tools to re-engage an alienated citizenry. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 311-321), Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Perry, C.R. ( 1987). Union corporate campaigns. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
44.
Pollach, I. ( 2003). Communicating corporate ethics on the World Wide Web . Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang .
45.
Post, J.E., Lawrence, A.T., & Weber, J. ( 2002). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy and ethics (10th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill-Irwin.
46.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. ( 1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research , 24, 481-506.
47.
Reber, B.H., & Berger, B.K. ( 2005). Framing analysis of activist rhetoric: How the Sierra Club succeeds or fails at creating salient messages. Public Relations Review, 31, 185-195.
48.
Schlechtweg, H.P. ( 1996). Media frames and environmental discourse: The case of "Focus: Logjam." In J. Cantrill & C. L. Oravec (Eds.), The symbolic earth: Discourse and our creation of the environment (pp. 257-277). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
49.
Simons, H.W., Morreale, J., & Gronbeck, B. ( 2001). Persuasion in society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Snow, D.A., Worden, S.K., Benford, R.D., & Rochford, E.A. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
51.
Spears, R., Abraham, S.C.S., Abrams, D., & Sheeran, P. ( 1992). Framing in terms of "high risk groups" versus "risky practices" and prognoses of HIV infection. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 195-201.
52.
Tuchman, G. ( 1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality . New York, NY: Free Press.
53.
Witmer, D.F. ( 2000). Spinning the Web: A handbook for public relations on the Internet. New York, NY: Longman .
54.
Zadek, S. ( 2001). The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship . London, England: Earthscan.
55.
Zaller, J.R. ( 1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
