This study of 261 Black and White participants determined how standard American English and Black English were perceived on 20 credibility measures. Results indicated that although standard American English was preferred by all participants on several key measures (including all measures of competence), speaker dialect did not alter perceived trustworthiness and likability. On measures of social distance, dialect played a secondary role to the race of the speaker, as White participants preferred White speakers and Black participants preferred Black speakers regardless of dialect.
Atkins, C. P. (1993). Do employment recruiters discriminate on the basic of nonstandard dialect?Journal of Employment Counseling, 30, 108-118.
2.
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563-576.
3.
Bock, H., & Pitts, J. (1975). The effects of three levels of Black dialect on perceived speaker image. Communication Education, 24, 218-225.
4.
Buck, J. F. (1968). The effects of Negro and White dialectal variations upon attitudes of college students. Speech Monographs, 35, 181-186.
5.
Cronkhite, G., & Liska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Monographs, 43, 91-107.
6.
Doss, R. C., & Gross, A. M. (1994). The effects of Black English and code-switching on interracial perceptions. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 282-293.
7.
Elwell, C. M., Brown, R. J., & Rutter, D. R. (1984). Effects of accent and visual information on impression formation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 297-299.
8.
Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1993). Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 289-308.
9.
Garner, T., & Rubin, T. L. (1986). Middle class Blacks’ perceptions of dialect and style shifting: The case of southern attorneys. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 33-48.
10.
Giles, H. (1970). Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 22, 211-227.
11.
Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1976). Methodological issues in dialect perception: A social psychological perspective. Anthropological Linguistics, 19, 294-304.
12.
Johnson, F., & Buttny, R. (1982). White listeners’ responses to “sounding Black” and “sounding White”: The effects of message content on judgments about language. Communication Monographs, 49, 33-49.
13.
Koch, L., & Gross, A. (1997). Children’s perceptions of Black English as a variable of interracial perceptions. Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 215-286.
14.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in Black English. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
15.
McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 36, 65-72.
16.
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90-103.
17.
Mulac, A. (1975). Evaluation of the Speech Dialect Attitudinal Scale. Speech Monographs, 42, 184-189.
18.
Nelson, G. (1997, August 4). Gorging on the jam—kubecalls the faithful; “party” is the mantra. The Seattle Times, p. F1.
19.
Seymour, H. N., & Seymour, C. M. (1979). The symbolism of Ebonics: I’d rather switch than fight. Journal of Black Studies, 9, 397-410.
20.
Smitherman, G. (1977). Talkin’ and testifyin’: The language of Black America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Smitherman, G., & Cunningham, S. (1997). Moving beyond resistance: Ebonics and African American youth. Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 227-232.
22.
Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1969). White and Negro listeners’ reactions to various American English dialects. Social Forces, 47, 463-468.
23.
Whitehead, J. L. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, 59-63.
24.
Williams, F. (1976). The exploration of the linguistic attitudes of teachers. Boston: Rowley.
25.
Zahn, C. J., & Hopper, R. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113-123.
