Abstract
This study analyzes why political rhetoric fails to translate into policy implementation in Ghana Beyond Aid by comparing it with South Korea’s Five-Year Economic Development Plan through the lens of the Multiple Streams Framework. While both countries experienced a policy window in the decision stage, only Korea sustained implementation through adaptive policy change with attention from policy entrepreneurs. In contrast, Ghana’s agenda regressed into rhetoric and weakened streams, exacerbated by external shocks. The findings offer insights for developing countries pursuing self-reliance strategies, emphasizing the need for flexible policy change and continuous leadership engagement to sustain development initiatives beyond political rhetoric.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
