The government of Botswana enacted the Tribal Land Act in 1968, which created statutory land boards in 1970. They replaced dikgosi (chiefs) from the administration of tribal land. However, from 1970 to 1984, dikgosi wielded considerable power in these five to six member boards then, as the only ex officio members. They had the legal authority to appoint one member, of their choice, to the land board. In most instances, the kgosi (chief), or his appointee, became the board’s chair and influenced its decisions. The Tribal Land (Amendment of Schedule) Order of 1984 introduced a major change by removing dikgosi’s powers to appoint anyone to the land board. It introduced the democratic elections of members of the land boards by communities. However, this has since been discontinued also in favour of the controversial ‘direct’ appointment by the Minister. Dikgosi remain ceremonial ex officio members of the land boards, with no voting rights, a situation they strongly abhor. This article critically analyses the status and role of dikgosi as ex officio members of the land boards within the framework of the Tribal Land Act since 1968. It also draws from other relevant legislations, secondary sources, and the views of some former land board members.
AinslieAKepeT (2016) Understanding the resurgence of traditional authorities in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies42(1): 19–33.
2.
Antwi-BediakoR (2018) Chiefs and nexus of challenges in land deals: An insight into blame perspectives, exonerating chiefs during and after Jatropha investment in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences4(1): 1–20.
3.
BaldwinK (2019) Elected MPs, traditional chiefs, and local public goods: evidence on the role of leaders in co-production from rural Zambia. Comparative Political Studies52(2): 1925–1936.
BauerG (2016) ‘What is wrong with a woman being chief?’ Women chiefs and symbolic and substantive representation in Botswana. Journal of Asian and African Studies51(2): 222–237.
7.
BeachDN (1998) An innocent woman, unjustly accused? Charwe, medium of the Nehanda Mhondoro spirit, and the 1896–97 central Shona rising in Zimbabwe. History in Africa25: 27–54.
8.
BennettJAinslieADavisJ (2013) Contested institutions? Traditional leaders and land access and control in communal areas of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Land Use Policy32: 27–38.
9.
BergstrandN (2003) Traditional authority in Mozambique: a potential resource in the implementation of a rural development project? MA dissertation, Lund University, Lund.
10.
BerryS (2001) Chiefs Know Their Boundaries: Essays on Property and the past in Asante, 1896–1996. Postmouth: Heinemann.
11.
BjerkP (2013) The allocation of land as a historical discourse of political authority in Tanzania. The International Journal of African Historical Studies46(21): 225–282.
12.
BolligerL (2018) Chiefs, terror, and propaganda: the motivations of Namibian loyalists to fight in South Africa’s security forces, 1975–1989. South African Historical Journal70(1): 124–151.
13.
BooneC (2007) Property and constitutional order: land tenure reform and the future of the African state. African Affairs106(425): 557–586.
14.
BooneCNyemeL (2015) Land institutions and political ethnicity in Africa: evidence from Tanzania. Comparative Politics48(1): 67–86.
BuurLKyedHM (2005) State recognition of traditional authority in Mozambique: the nexus of community representation and state assistance. Discussion Paper 28. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/96053/28.pdf
17.
ChigwataT (2016) The role of traditional leaders in Zimbabwe: are they still relevant?Law and Democracy Development20: 69–89.
18.
ComaroffJL (1980) Class and culture in a peasant economy: the transformation of land tenure in Barolong. Journal of African Law24(1): 85–113.
19.
DandeIMujereJ (2019) Contested histories and contested land claims: traditional authorities and the fast track land reform programme in Zimbabwe, 2000–2017. Review of African Political Economy46(159): 86–100.
20.
EggenO (2011) Chiefs and everyday governance: parallel state organisation in Malawi. Journal of Southern African Studies37(2): 313–331.
21.
FindlayJSTwineWC (2018) Chiefs in a democracy: a case study of the ‘new’ systems of regulating firewood harvesting in post-apartheid South Africa. Land7(35): 1–21.
22.
FriedmanJT (2005) Making politics, making history: chiefship and the post-apartheid state in Namibia. Journal of Southern African Studies31(1): 23–52.
23.
GermanLShoneveldGMwangiE (2011) Processes of large-scale land acquisition by investors: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, Brighton.
GonçalvesE (2006) Local powers and decentralisation: recognition of community leaders in Mocumbi, southern Mozambique. Journal of Contemporary African Studies24(1): 29–52.
26.
HallR (2011) Land grabbing in Southern Africa: the many faces of the investor rush. Review of African Political Economy38(128): 193–214.
27.
HendricksFNtsebezaL (1999) Chiefs and rural government in post-apartheid South Africa. African Journal of Political Science4(1): 99–126.
28.
HolmenH (2015) Is land grabbing always what it is supposed to be? Large-scale land investments in sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review33(4): 457–478.
29.
IfezueGO (2015) Understanding chieftainship in Botswana: the status and powers of chiefs in present day Botswana. Journal of African Law59(2): 271–293.
30.
KalabamuFT (2011) Limits of incremental land tenure reform in Botswana. In: HomeR (ed.) Local Case Studies in African Land Law. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, pp.117–136.
31.
KepeTHallR (2018) Land redistribution in South Africa: towards decolonisation or recolonisation?Politikon45(1): 128–137.
32.
KirstS (2020) ‘Chiefs do not talk law, most of them talk power’: traditional authorities in conflicts over land grabbing in Ghana. Canadian Journal of African Studies54(3): 519–539.
33.
KuusaanaED (2017) Winners and losers in large-scale transactions in Ghana: opportunities for win-win outcomes. Africa Review of Economics and Finance9(1): 62–95.
34.
KyedHMBuurL (2006) New sites of citizenship: recognition of traditional authority and group-based citizenship in Mozambique. Journal of Southern African Studies22(3): 563–581.
35.
LanzKGerberJDHallerT (2018) Land grabbing, the state and chiefs: the politics of extending commercial agriculture in Ghana. Development and Change49(6): 1526–1552.
36.
MakgalaCJ (2001) The policy of indirect rule in Bechuanaland Protectorate, 1926–1957. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
37.
MamdaniM (1996) Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. London: James Currey.
38.
ManatshaBT (2019) Reflections on Botswana’s Tribal Land Act no.1 of 2018. Journal of African Geospatial Sciences and Land Policy2(3): 73–84.
39.
ManatshaBT (2020a) Chiefs and the politics of land reform in the North East District, Botswana, 2005–2008. Journal of Asian and African Studies55(1): 111–127.
40.
ManatshaBT (2020b) Reflections on the acquisition of land by non-citizens in Botswana. Journal of Land and Rural Studies8(2): 185–204.
41.
ManatshaBTMorapediWG (2022) Reflections on a quota system for tribal land allocation in peri-urban areas in Botswana. Journal of Contemporary African Studies40(1): 63–77.
42.
MasireQKJ (2006) Very Brave or Very Foolish? Memoirs of an African Democrat. Gaborone, Botswana: Macmillan Botswana.
43.
MathisSM (2007) The politics of land reform: tenure and political authority in rural Kwazulu-Natal. Journal of Agrarian Change7(1): 99–120.
44.
MgadlaPT (1998) The kgosi in a traditional Tswana setting. In: EdgeWLekorweMH (eds) Botswana: Politics and Society. Pretoria, South Africa: JL Van Shaik, pp.3–10.
45.
MillerNNSkinnerEP (1968) The political survival of traditional leadership: the ‘paradox’ of rural leadership: a comment. The Journal of Modern African Studies16(2): 183–201.
46.
MkodzongiG (2016) ‘I am a paramount chief, this land belongs to my ancestors’: the reconfiguration of rural authority after Zimbabwe’s land reforms. Review of African Political Economy43(1): 99–114.
47.
MogaeFG (2013) Keynote address at the annual World Bank conference on land and poverty. Washington, DC.
48.
MorapediWG (2010) Demise or resilience? Customary law and chieftaincy in twenty-first century Botswana. Journal of Contemporary African Studies28(2): 215–230.
49.
MuriaasRL (2009) Local perspectives on the ‘neutrality’ of traditional authorities in Malawi, South Africa and Uganda. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics47(1): 28–51.
50.
Ng’ombeAKeivaniR (2013) Customary land reform to facilitate private investment in Zambia: achievements, potential and limitations. Urban Forum24: 33–48.
51.
Ng’ong’olaC (1992) Land problems in some peri-urban villages in Botswana and problems of conception, description and transformation of ‘tribal’ land tenure. Journal of African Law36(2): 140–167.
52.
Ng’ong’olaC (2019) Botswana’s Tribal Land Act of 2018: confounding innovations with congenital and other defects. University of Botswana Law Journal27: 3–35.
53.
NtsebezaL (2003) Land rights and democratisation: rural tenure reform in South Africa’s former Bantustans. Transformation52: 68–95.
54.
NtsebezaL (2004) Democratic decentralisation and traditional authority: dilemmas of land administration in rural South Africa. European Journal of Development Research16(1): 71–89.
55.
NtsebezaL (2005) Democracy Compromised: Chiefs and the Politics of the Land in South Africa. Leiden: Brill Academic Publication.
56.
OrluAJAchinuloEC (2017) Traditional administrative system and the politics of land management in Akpor Kingdom, in Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Political Science and Leadership Research3(2): 56–73.
57.
OtubuA (2018) The Land Use Act and land administration in 21st century Nigeria: need for reforms. Journal of Sustainable Development, Law and Policy19(1): 80–108.
58.
QuigleyJ (1992) Perestroika African style: one-party government and human rights in Tanzania. Michigan Journal of International Law13(3): 611–652.
59.
RathboneR (2000) Nkrumah and the Chiefs: The Politics of Chieftaincy in Ghana, 1951–1960. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
60.
Republic of Botswana (1968) The Tribal Land Act No. 54 of 1968. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
61.
Republic of Botswana (1975) Land Control Act No. 23 of 1975. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
62.
Republic of Botswana (1984) Tribal Land (Amendment of Schedule) Order, 1984: Statutory Instrument No. 91 of 1984. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
63.
Republic of Botswana (1986) Tribal Land (Amendment of Schedule) Order, 1986: Statutory Instrument No. 35 of 1986. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
64.
Republic of Botswana (1993) Tribal Land (Amendment) Act No. 14 of 1993. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
65.
Republic of Botswana (1994) Tribal Land Act. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
66.
Republic of Botswana (2008a) Bogosi Act. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
67.
Republic of Botswana (2008b) Report of the Joint Advisory Committee of Ntlo ya Dikgosi and Botswana Council of Churches on Social Values. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
68.
Republic of Botswana (2010) Fourth Meeting of the 2nd Ntlo ya Dikgosi Sitting from 25 October to 5 November 2010. Gaborone, Botswana: Ntlo ya Dikgosi.
69.
Republic of Botswana (2018) Tribal Land Act No.1 of 2018. Gaborone, Botswana: Government.
70.
Republic of Botswana (2019) Revised Botswana Land Policy. Gaborone, Botswana: Government Printer.
71.
Republic of Botswana (2020) Press Release: Land Boards Selection Process to be Uniform/Standardised. Gaborone, Botswana: Ministry of Land Management, Water Affairs and Sanitation.
72.
Republic of Botswana (2022) Press Release: Commencement of Tribal Land Act of 2018. Gaborone, Botswana: Ministry of Lands and Water Affairs.
73.
Republic of Zambia (2021) Report of the Committee on Local Governance, Housing and Chiefs’ Affairs for the Fifth Session of the Twelfth National Assembly. Lusaka, Zambia: National Assembly of Zambia.
TlouTCampbellA (1997) History of Botswana. Gaborone, Botswana: Macmillan.
80.
UbinkJ (2013) Traditional authority revisited: popular perceptions of chiefs and chieftaincy in peri-urban Kumasi. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law39(55): 123–161.
81.
USAID (2013) South Sudan rural land governance (SRLG) project: annual report, April 2012–31 March 2013. USAID: Tetra Tech ARD. Available at: https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JKFS.pdf
82.
WilyLA (2011) ‘The law is to blame’: the vulnerability status of common property rights in sub-Saharan Africa. Development and Change42(3): 733–757.
