The paper attempts to investigate the origin of inequality in educational participation across Indian social groups in terms of inequality in the expected monetary educational returns and other demand-side factors responsible behind educational decision. We employ the binary logit model of regression for the accomplishment of the objective of this study. In addition, we decompose the discrepancy in educational participation into ‘response effect’ and ‘attribute effect’ to examine whether there is any discrimination in educational participation against the members of the disadvantaged social groups.
ArnesonRJ (1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies56: 77–93.
2.
BaldwinMLButlerRJJohnsonWG (2001) A hierarchical theory of occupational segregation and wage discrimination. Economic Inquiry39(1): 94–110.
3.
BanerjeeAVDufloE (2011) Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.
4.
BeckerGS (1975) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 2nd ed.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
5.
BlinderAS (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources8: 436–455.
6.
BorooahVKIyerS (2005) The decomposition of inter-group differences in a logit model: extending the Oaxaca-Blinder approach with an application to school enrolment in India. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement30(4): 279–293.
7.
BourguignonFFerreiraFHGMenéndezM (2007) Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. The Review of Income and Wealth53(4): 585–618.
8.
ChecchiDDardanoniV (2002) Mobility comparisons: does using different measures matter?Research on Economic Inequality9: 113–145.
9.
ChecchiDPeragineV (2010) Inequality of opportunity in Italy. Journal of Economic Inequality8: 429–450.
10.
ChecchiDPeragineVSerlengaL (2010) Fair and unfair income inequalities in Europe. Working paper no. 174. Rome: Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ECINEQ).
DeshpandeA (2001) Caste at birth? Redefining disparity in India. Review of Development Economics5(1): 130–144.
13.
DrèzeJKingdonGG (1999) School participation in rural India. The Development Economics Discussion Paper Series (DEDPS), working paper no. 18, August. London: DEDPS.
14.
DuraisamyM (2002) Child schooling and child work in India. National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) working paper no. 84, April. New Delhi, India: NCAER.
15.
DworkinR (1981a) What is equality? Part 1: equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs10: 185–246.
16.
DworkinR (1981b) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs10: 283–345.
17.
FerreiraFHGGignouxJ (2007) Inequality of Economic Opportunity in Latin America. Washington, DC: The World Bank; London: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
FerreiraFHGGignouxJ (2011) The measurement of inequality of opportunity: theory and an application to Latin America. The Review of Income and Wealth57(4): 622–657.
19.
HarperBHaqM (1997) Occupational attainment of men in Britain. Oxford Economic Papers49: 638–650.
20.
HeckmanJJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47(1): 153–161.
21.
HnatkovskaVLahiriAPaulS (2012) Castes and labor mobility. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 274–307.
22.
HuismanAHMSmitsJPJM (2009) Keeping children in school: household and district-level determinants of school dropout in 363 districts of 30 developing countries. NICE working paper no. 09-105, January. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
23.
KijimaY (2006) Caste and tribe inequality: evidence from India, 1983–1999. Economic Development and Cultural Change54(2): 369–404.
24.
KingdonGGTheopoldN (2008) Do returns to education matter to schooling participation? Evidence from India. Education Economics16(4): 329–350.
25.
KocharA (2001) Emerging challenges for Indian Education Policy. Working paper no. 97, March. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Stanford University.
26.
MastersonT (2012) An empirical analysis of gender bias in education spending in Paraguay. World Development40(3): 583–593.
27.
MincerJ (1974) Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy66(4): 281–321.
28.
NielsenHS (1998) Discrimination and detailed decomposition in a logit model. Economics Letters61: 115–120.
29.
OaxacaR (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review14: 693–709.
30.
Ray ChaudhuryA (2013) Interpreting the concept of representational inequality to reckon between-group inequality for different types of data. Economics Bulletin33(4): 2890–2904.
31.
Ray ChaudhuryASinhaM (2020) Does education produce identical labour market outcomes for all? A study on India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research14(3): 309–331.
32.
RoemerJE (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy and Public Affairs22: 146–166.
33.
RoemerJE (1996) Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
RoemerJE (1998) Equality of Opportunity. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
RoemerJE (2006) Economic development as opportunity equalization. Discussion paper no. 1583, 20 September. New Haven, CT: Cowles Foundation.
36.
SarkarSRay ChaudhuryASinhaM (2022) Impact of family background on cognitive skills: an empirical investigation. The Indian Economic Journal70(3): 533–545.
37.
SchultzTW (1975) The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature13(3): 827–846.
38.
SinghA (2012) Inequality of opportunity in earnings and consumption expenditure: the case of Indian men. The Review of Income and Wealth58(1): 79–106.
