Using household surveys for 2008 and 2011, a multidimensional destitution measure is constructed for Pakistan’s most populated province – Punjab. Using a non-monetary framework for dimensions of health, education and standard of living, the study paints a temporal picture of the extremely impoverished households in districts and towns, while highlighting the impact of the destructive 2010 floods. Results reveal the existence of pervasive destitution, with half of the multidimensionally poor households also identified as destitute. Destitution is higher for rural as compared to urban households, while the geography of destitution highlights its concentration in south-west Punjab, providing insights for targeted interventions.
AdairV (2002) Branded with infamy: inscriptions of poverty and class in the United States. Journal of Women in Culture and Society27(2): 451–471.
2.
AlkireSFangY (2019) Dynamics of multidimensional poverty and uni-dimensional income poverty: an evidence of stability analysis from China. Social Indicators Research142: 25–64.
3.
AlkireSFosterJE (2011) Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics95(7–8): 476–487.
4.
AlkireSSantosME (2010) Acute multidimensional poverty: a new index for developing countries. Working paper no. 38. Oxford: OPHI.
5.
AlkireSConconiASethS (2014) Multidimensional destitution: an ordinal counting methodology for constructing linked subsets of the poor. OPHI research in progress 42a. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford.
6.
AlkireSRocheJMVazA (2014) Multidimensional poverty dynamics: methodology and results for 34 countries. OPHI research in progress paper 41a. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Institution, University of Oxford. Available at: https://ophi.org.uk/ophi-research-in-progress-41a-2/
7.
AnguloRDiazYPardoR (2016) The Colombian Multidimensional Poverty Index: measuring poverty in a public policy context. Social Indicators Research127: 1–38.
8.
AppletonS (2001) Changes in poverty and inequality. In: CollierPReinikkaR (eds) Uganda’s Recovery: The Role of Farms, Firms and Government. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp.83–121.
9.
BarahonaI (2018) Poverty in Mexico: its relationship to social and cultural indicators. Social Indicators Research135(2): 599–627.
BattistonDCrucesGLopez-CalvaLF, et al. (2013) Income and beyond: multidimensional poverty in six Latin American countries. Social Indicators Research112(2): 291–314.
ChambersR (2001) The world development report: concepts, content and a chapter 12. Journal of International Development13(3): 299–306.
14.
CheemaAKhalidLPatnamM (2008) The geography of poverty: evidence from the Punjab. The Lahore Journal of Economics: Special Edition13: 163–188.
15.
DasguptaP (1993) An Inquiry into Well-being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
DattG (2013) Making every dimension count: multidimensional poverty without the dual cut off. Monash economics working papers 32–13. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Monash University.
17.
DevereuxS (2003) Conceptualising Destitution, vol. 216. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies, pp.14, 17.
18.
DouglasM (1991) Witchcraft and leprosy: two strategies of exclusion. Man: New Series26(4): 72–736.
GangopadhyayPShankarSRahmanA (2014) Working poverty, social exclusion and destitution: an empirical study. Economic Modelling37: 241–250.
22.
Harriss-WhiteB (2005) Destitution and the poverty of its politics: with special reference to South Asia. World Development33(6): 881–891.
23.
HayatiDKaramiESleeB (2006) Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in the measurement of rural poverty: the case of Iran. Social Indicators Research75(3): 361–394.
24.
JamalHKhanAJ (2007) Trends in regional human development indices. Research report no. 73, Karachi, Pakistan: Social Policy and Development Centre, pp. 1–15.
KirschTDWadhwaniCSauerL, et al. (2012) Impact of the 2010 Pakistan floods on rural and urban populations at six months. PLoS Currents4. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441151/ (accessed 23 October 2017).
27.
LaderchiCRSaithRStewartF (2003) Does it matter that we do not agree on a definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches. Oxford Development Studies31(3): 243–274.
28.
McGeeRBrockK (2001) From poverty assessment to policy change: processes, actors and data. Working paper no. 133. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
29.
MaslowAH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review50(4): 370–396.
30.
MaxwellS (1999) The Meaning and Measurement of Poverty. London: Overseas Development Institute Poverty Briefing.
Planning and Development (2011) Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey: Punjab 2011. Lahore, Pakistan: Planning and Development Department, Bureau of Statistics: Government of Punjab.
35.
Planning and Development (2018) Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey: Punjab 2007–08. Lahore, Pakistan: Planning and Development Department, Bureau of Statistics: Government of Punjab.
36.
RavallionM (2016) Are the world’s poorest being left behind?Journal of Economic Growth21: 139–164.
37.
RowntreeSB (1901) Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
SahnDEStifelDC (2000) Poverty comparisons over time and across countries in Africa. World Development28: 2123–2155.
39.
SenA (1983) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
SenA (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
41.
SharpKDevereuxS (2004) Destitution in Wollo (Ethiopia): chronic poverty as a crisis of household and community livelihoods. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities5(2): 227–247.
42.
TiwariM (2007) Chronic poverty and entitlement theory. Third World Quarterly28(1): 171–191.
43.
TraniJ-FKuhlberjJCanningsT, et al. (2016) Multidimensional poverty in Afghanistan: who are the poorest of the poor?Oxford Development Studies44(2): 220–245.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
