Despite the unsuccessful outcomes of his policies on economic growth and North Korea, Moon Jae-in at midterm has received relatively high levels of job approval ratings compared to his immediate predecessors. What made it possible for him to maintain these ratings? To analyze this puzzle, we employed the three commonly noted leadership qualities—effective communication, political skill, and organizational capacity—suggested by presidential study scholars. We found that Moon Jae-in’s leadership qualities are not the compelling reason for his relatively high approval ratings. Instead, there are three alternative reasons for Moon Jae-in’s relatively high approval ratings: (a) better handling of the media; (b) collapse of the conservatives; and (c) multiple summit meetings with Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un. The latter two reasons are contextual factors, which are our theoretical contribution to the literature.
Chosun Ilbo (2019b) Reappearance of the Income-Led Growth Policy Based on Select Statistics . . . Moon Claims the Policy Is Effective and Income and Wealth Redistribution Improved, 21November. Available at: http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2019/11/21/2019112102156.html (accessed 21 November 2019).
5.
CohenJE (2015) Presidential leadership of public opinion: An embedded survey experiment. Political Communication32(3): 345–355.
Donga Ilbo (2019c) Percentage of Presidential Appointment Against the National Assembly’s Wish, the Moon Administration 48 Percent, Highest in the History, 3September. Available at: http://www.donga.com/news/Main/article/all/20190903/97240093/1 (accessed 4 September 2019).
9.
DruckmanJNHolmesJW (2004) Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly34(4): 755–778.
GreensteinFI (2004) The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to George W. Bush. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
HahmSD (2020) South Korea in 2019: Little progress in denuclearization of North Korea and poor macroeconomic performance. Asian Survey60(1): 61–68.
14.
HahmSDHeoUk (2018) The first female president in South Korea: Park Geun-hye’s leadership and South Korean democracy. Journal of Asian and African Studies53(5): 649–665.
15.
HahmSDLeeDS (2008) Evaluation of the Roh Moo-hyun administration. Korea Observer39(2): 181–213.
16.
HahmSDJungKLeeSY (2013) Exploring the determinants of the entry and exit of ministers in Korea, 1980–2008. Governance26(4): 657–675.
17.
HargroveEC (1995) Jimmy Carter: The politics of public goods. In: GreensteinFI (ed.) Leadership in the Modern Presidency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.228–259.
18.
HeoUkYunS (2019) South Korea in 2018: Summit meetings for the denuclearization of North Korea. Asian Survey59(1): 54–62.
Joongang Ilbo (2005) Support for Grand National Party more than 40 Percent . . . Achieving the Dream?, 9November. Available at: https://news.joins.com/article/1719037 (accessed 25 November 2019).
21.
Joongang Ilbo (2019) Construction and Manufacturing Jobs Reduced by 130,000; Tax-Supported Jobs in Public Health and Wealth Increased by 80,000, 21March. Available at: https://news.joins.com/article/23417543 (accessed 22 March 2019).
Korea Herald (2019a) Blacklist or checklist? In light of clues to Cheong Wa Dae’s involvement, there should be no sanctuary from investigation, 21February. Available at: http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20190221000508&ACE_SEARCH=1 (accessed 21 February 2019).
LeeY-I (2016) From first daughter to first lady to first woman president: Park Geun-hye’s path to the South Korean presidency. Feminist Media Studies17(3): 377–391.
33.
LowiTJ (1985) The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
34.
Media Today (2019) Cheong Wa Dae should improve appointment system, 9September.
35.
MoeTM (1985) The politicized presidency. In: JohnECPaulEP (eds) The New Direction in American Politics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp.235–271.
RockmanB (1996) Leadership style and the Clinton presidency. In: ColinCBertAR (eds) The Clinton Presidency: First Appraisals. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers, pp.301–322.
WeingastB (2005) Caught in the middle: The president, congress, and the political bureaucratic system. In: JoelAMarkP (eds) The Executive Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.312–328.
