The Revival of ‘Big Government’ Discourse in South Korea,2017

Abstract

After the democratisation of South Korea in 1987, political discourse on ‘big government’ nearly disappeared, largely because it recalled past authoritarianism. Authoritarian states are highly likely to employ ‘big government’ – exerting policy influence over the distribution of private resources – to sustain their political power, and Korea’s authoritarian state was no exception. Thus, newly inaugurated President Moon Jae-in’s official implication that he would pursue big government is notable, because he claimed to represent pro-democracy groups that opposed both historical authoritarianism and the former president’s undemocratic governance. In this context, this study examines external and internal political-economic factors behind the revival of big government discourse in Korea. Results show that critical factors included the lack of pressure in the global capitalist market and the dominance of governmentalists over marketists in the political-economic discourse influencing the administration’s maintenance and expansion of its political foundation.

Keywords

Big government governmentalists marketists income inequality Moon Jae-in administration South Korea

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

(2006) Approval rate of President Roh. Chosun Daily, 5 June. Available at: http://news.chosun.com/politics/news/200606/200606050001.html (accessed 20 March 2018).

Allan

Scruggs

(2004) Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496–512.

Bae

(2010) Efficiency and limit of Kim Dae-jung government’s organisational reforms with the idea of small government. Korean Political Science Review 44(4): 73–95.

Bobbio

(2006) Left and Right. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Borre

Viegas

(1995) Government intervention in the economy. In: Borre

Scarbrough

(eds) The Scope of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.234–280.

Carnoy

Shearer

(2016) Economic Democracy. London: Routledge.

Cha

(2017) Transition to big government. Korea JoongAng Daily, 29 August. Available at: https://news.joins.com/article/21883751 (accessed 8 May 2018).

Chen

Lee

(2005) Government size and economic growth in Taiwan. Journal of Policy Modeling 27(9): 1051–1066.

Cho

(2017) Moon government succeeded the ‘candlelight spirit’. Sisapress News, 23 November. Available at: http://www.sisapress.com/journal/article/172343 (accessed 8 May 2018).

10.

Cho

(2018) Creating jobs depends on the National Finance Strategy Meeting. Hankyoreh, 21 March. Available at: http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201803212103005&code=990100&utm_campaign=share_btn_click&utm_source=naverblog&utm_medium=social_share&utm_content=khan_view (accessed 22 January 2019).

11.

Choi

(2017) Economic effects of the renegotiation of US-Korea free trade agreement on Korean industry. IR Focus 198: 1–3. Available at: http://www.kirs.or.kr/download/irfocus/i201703.pdf (accessed 10 June 2018).

12.

Choi

(2018a) Park Yong-man demanded de-regulation. SBS News, 6 November. Available at: http://sbscnbc.sbs.co.kr/read.jsp?pmArticleId=10000920154 (accessed 10 June 2018).

13.

Choi

(2018b) Energy enterprises in Thailand. Asia Today, 12 April. Available at: http://www.asiatoday.co.kr/view.php?key=20180412010007070 (accessed 15 June 2018).

14.

Chosun Daily (2018) Park’s sentence? Chosun Daily, 7 April. Available at: http://news.chosun.com (accessed 15 June 2018).

15.

Chung

(1999) Small government in Korea? Academy of Korean Studies 22(1): 193–224.

16.

Dar

Khalkhali

(2002) Government size, factor accumulation, and economic growth. Journal of Policy Modeling 24(7–8): 679–692.

17.

Dicken

(2007) Global Shift. London: SAGE.

18.

Economic Reform Research Institute (n.d.) Home page. Available at: http://www.erri.or.kr/ (accessed 10 June 2018).

19.

Economic Reform Research Institute (2013) Evaluation on Lee Myung-bak government and its implications on Park Geun-hye government. Economy Reform Report 208: 1–29.

20.

Gamble

(1994) The Free Economy and the Strong State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

21.

Gamble

(2016) Can the Welfare State Survive? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

22.

Giroux

(2011) Neoliberalism and the death of the social state. Social Identities 17(4): 587–601.

23.

Government Information Agency (2003) State Vision of Participatory Government. Seoul: Government Information Agency.

24.

(2016) Park’s 78.2% and Roh’s 78.2%. Ohmynews, 8 October. Available at: http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002268897 (accessed 17 May 2018).

25.

Hoa

(2018) FDI giants – a success story. Viet Nam News, 9 November. Available at: https://vietnamnews.vn/economy/465241/fdi-giants-a-success-story.html#0jsvpk8luDm0AQmy.97 (accessed 20 December 2018).

26.

Hodges

(1963) Pro-governmentalism in Virginia. The Journal of Politics 25(2): 333–360.

27.

Hong

(2017) Top income shares until 2015. Labour Review 143: 81–83.

28.

Iversen

Stephens

(2008) Partisan politics, the welfare state and the three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies 41(4–5): 600–637.

29.

Jeon

(2017) Statement of pledge. Available at: http://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2017/08/18/2017081801150.html (accessed 11 June 2018).

30.

JoongAng Ilbo (2010) Occupy Yeouido. JoongAng Ilbo, 11 October. Available at: http://news.joins.com/article/6392774 (accessed 11 June 2018).

31.

Kang

(2016) The party that presents solutions for polarisation issue will win. JoongAng Ilbo, 12 February. Available at: https://news.joins.com/article/19555980 (accessed 10 June 2018).

32.

Kang

(2009) Ideology and Thoughts of Korean Politics. Seoul: Humanitas.

33.

Kang

(2006) Is Korean government big or small? JoongAng Ilbo, 5 April. Available at: https://news.joins.com/article/2255053 (accessed 11 August 2018).

34.

Kim

(2011) The ideological identity of Korean conservatism. Critical Review of History 95(5): 8–35.

35.

Kim

(2018) Asking Samsung to invest. Asia Economy, 13 August. Available at: http://view.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2018081311553411725 (accessed 15 May 2018).

36.

Kim

(1995) The analysis and evaluation of politico-economic development under the Park regime. Korean Political Science Review 29(2): 181–215.

37.

Kim

Kwon

(1997) Small government? Korean Public Administration Review 31(3): 275–293.

38.

Kim

(2007) Small government theory. Proceedings of the Winter Meeting of Seoul Association for Public Administration 75–95.

39.

Kim

(2013) Social polarisation in Korea and the multi-dimensional theory of justice. Society and Philosophy 26: 223–250.

40.

Kim

(2018) Samsung responded to President Moon’s request. Business Post, 8 August. Available at: http://www.businesspost.co.kr/BP?command=article_view&num=91947 (accessed 15 August 2018).

41.

Korea Development Institute (2016) Economic Outlook. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.

42.

Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (2018) Data. Available at: http://nodong.org/data (accessed 8 June 2018).

43.

KOSIS (2018) Economically active general population by age. Available at: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1DA7002S&conn_path=I3 (accessed 6 August 2018).

44.

Kwon

Holliday

(2007) The Korean welfare state. International Journal of Social Welfare 16(3): 241–248.

45.

Lee

Lim

(2009) A study on government reorganisation after democratisation in Korea. Korean Policy Science Review 13(4): 1–17.

46.

Lee

(2018a) There is a long way to go to accomplish zero irregular employment. Business Post, 9 May. Available at: http://www.businesspost.co.kr/BP?command=article_view&num=81860 (accessed 9 May 2018).

47.

Lee

(2017) Who participated in the 2017 candlelight protest and why? Korean Political Studies 26(2): 75–103.

48.

Lee

(2018b) Economists’ criticisms of Moon government’s income-led growth theory. Hankyung, 4 June. Available at: http://news.hankyung.com/article/2018060182401 (accessed 15 June 2018).

49.

Lee

(2006) Social polarisation. Progressive Ideas Review 29: 196–215.

50.

Lee

(2009) The role of think tanks to make a smaller and more effective government. Korean Journal of International Studies 49(2): 129–153.

51.

Madrick

(2009) The Case for Big Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

52.

Manin

Przeworski

Stokes

(1999) Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Martin

Schumann

(2003) Die Globalisierungsfalle. Kang

(trans). Seoul: Youngrim.

54.

Minimum Wage Commission (2017) Minimum Wage of 2018. Available at: www.minimumwage.go.kr (accessed 5 December 2017).

55.

Ministry of Economy and Finance (2018) Supplementary budget in 2018 [press release]. Seoul: Ministry of Economy and Finance.

56.

Ministry of Employment and Labor (2017) Guideline to accomplish zero irregular employment at public institutions. Available at: http://www.moel.go.kr (accessed 10 December 2017).

57.

Minjoo Party (2015) Code of conduct. Available at: http://www.theminjoo.kr/platform.do#n (accessed 20 January 2019).

58.

Moran

(2001) The rise of the regulatory state in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 54(1): 19–34.

59.

National Assembly Research Service (2017) Key issues related to income-led growth. Available at: www.nars.go.kr (accessed 15 December 2017).

60.

National Planning Advisory Committee (2017) Five-year plan of the Moon government, 15 December. Seoul: National Planning Advisory Committee.

61.

News Big Data and Analysis (2019) Home page. Available at: www.kinds.or.kr (accessed 21 January 2019).

62.

Noh

Lee

Kim

(2017) Governmental management philosophy reflected in the president’s remarks. Yonhap News, 10 May. Available at: http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2017/05/10/0200000000AKR20170510173300001.HTML (accessed 22 June 2018).

63.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010) Trade and the Economic Recovery: Why Open Markets Matter. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/trade/45293795.pdf (accessed 10 December 2017).

64.

Park

(2013) What is the problem of a ‘big government?’ Chosun News, 13 December. Available at: http://pub.chosun.com/client/news/viw.asp?cate=C06&mcate=M1025&nNewsNumb=20131213672&nidx=13673 (accessed 12 June 2018).

65.

Park

Choi

Lee

, et al. (1992) The concept of ‘small government’. Korean Public Administration Review 26(1): 39–55.

66.

Park

Wang

(2004) Big government vs. small government. Korean Public Administration Review 38(4): 466–482.

67.

Persson

Tabellini

(1999) The size and scope of government: Comparative politics with rational politicians. European Economic Review 43: 699–735.

68.

Peters

(1996) The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

69.

Poole

(2017) The Origins of Economic Democracy. London: Routledge.

70.

Porter

(2014) In new tack, I.M.F. aims at income inequality. New York Times, 8 April. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/09/business/economy/in-new-tack-imf-aims-at-income-inequality.html?ref=business&_r=0 (accessed 1 May 2018).

71.

Presidential Transition Committee (2008) The 17th Presidential Transition Committee White Paper: Success and Sharing. Seoul: Presidential Transition Committee.

72.

Rasmussen

(2001) ‘Nations’ or ‘states’ an attempt at definition. Global Policy Forum, 20 July. Available at: https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/172/30341.html (accessed 21 January 2019).

73.

Realmeter (2018) Chart of approval ratings. Available at: http://www.realmeter.net/category/chart/ (accessed 7 June 2018).

74.

Republic of Korea (n.d.) Webpage of Cheong Wa Dae. Available at: http://www.president.go.kr (accessed 11 June 2018).

75.

Rogowski

(1989) Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

76.

Saenuri Party (n.d.) Home page. Available at: http://www.libertykoreaparty.kr (accessed 8 September 2016).

77.

Schedler

(2002) The nested game of democratization by elections. International Political Science Review 23(1): 103–122.

78.

Seo

(2018) Finance minister visits Samsung, meets with Lee. Korea JoongAng Daily, 7 August. Available at: http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=3051565 (accessed 11 May 2018).

79.

Seo

(2017) Moon criticised by Korea Employers’ Federation. Hankyoreh Daily, 27 May. Available at: http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/796421.html (accessed 23 May 2018).

80.

SisaIN News (2017) People rallied around Moon. SisaIN News, 20 January. Available at: http://www.sisain.co.kr (accessed 12 June 2018).

81.

Smith

(1998) Laclau and Mouffe. London: Routledge.

82.

Son

(2005) Characteristics of Kim Dae-Jung government’s welfare reform. Korean Political Science Review 39(1): 213–231.

83.

Statistics Korea (2018) Home page. Available at: http://kostat.go.kr (accessed 10 May 2018).

84.

Stillman

(1997) American vs. European public administration. Public Administration Review 57(4): 332–338.

85.

Suleiman

(2003) Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

86.

Supreme Court of Korea (n.d.) Home page. Available at: https://www.scourt.go.kr (accessed 10 May 2018).

87.

Vedder

Gallaway

(1998) Government Size and Economic Growth. Paper prepared for the Joint Economic Committee. Available at: https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/da82f715-a9d3-4625-8cf2-264b11153962/government-size-and-economic-growth.pdf (accessed 10 May 2018).

88.

Walter

(2010) Globalisation and the welfare state. International Studies Quarterly 54(2): 403–426.

89.

Yang

(2006) Sixty years of welfare policy in Korea. Korean Public Administration Review 42(2): 327–349.

90.

Yang

(2016) A study on the small welfare state. Journal of Governmental Studies 22(3): 3–28.

91.

Yang

Min

(2013) The political economy of the low tax regime and tax increase in the Korean welfare state. Trend and Prospect 88: 48–96.

92.

Yang

(2017) Interview with a chairman candidate of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions. Maeil Labour News, 24 November. Available at: http://www.labortoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=148175 (accessed 5 June 2018)

93.

Yoon

(2007) What kind of welfare state? Citizen and the World 12: 223–239.

94.

Yoon

Kim

(2013) The comparative leadership potential of the Korean president-elect, Park Geun-Hye. Social Science Research Review 29(1): 71–93.

95.

Young

(2002) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.