The resurgence of the debate on standardization of labor laws via trade has brought into focus the importance of labeling programs, which are seen as a desirable avenue to remedy weak labor laws in the “South.” This study aims to quantify the impact of the Fairtrade labeling program on the welfare position of workers in the football industry. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) is used to calculate the treatment effect of the program. The study finds no treatment effect of labeling upon the welfare condition of workers. It concludes that the overall program has failed to make an impact upon the lives of workers.
BasuKTzannatosZ (2003) The global child labor problem: What do we know and what can we do?The World Bank Economic Review17(2): 147–173.
4.
BecchettiLConstantinoM (2008) The effects of fair trade on affiliated producers: An impact analysis on Kenyan farmers. World Development36(5): 823–842.
5.
BeckerSOIchinoA (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal2(4): 358–377.
6.
BhagwatiJN (1995) Trade liberalization and fair trade demands: Addressing the environmental and labour standards issues. The World Economy18(6): 745–759.
7.
BhagwatiJNHudecRE (1996a) Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade?Vol. 1. USA: MIT Press.
8.
BhagwatiJNHudecRE (1996b) Fair trade and harmonization: Prerequisites for free trade?Vol. 2. USA: MIT Press.
9.
BrownDKDeardorffAVSternRM (1993) International labor standards and trade: A theoretical analysis. USA: Institute of Public Policy Studies, University of Michigan.
10.
BrownDK (2001) Labor standards: Where do they belong on the international trade agenda?The Journal of Economic Perspectives15(3): 89–112.
11.
ChakrabartySGroteU (2009) Child labor in carpet weaving: Impact of social labeling in India and Nepal. World Development37(10): 1683–1693.
12.
ChakrabartySGroteULuchtersG (2011) Does social labelling encourage child schooling and discourage child labour in Nepal?International Journal of Educational Development31(5): 489–495.
13.
DehejiaRHWahbaS (2002) Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics84(1): 151–161.
14.
EasterlyW (2001) The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. USA: MIT Press.
FreemanRB (1996) The world trading system: Challenges ahead. International Labor Standards and World trade: Friends or Foes?Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics, pp. 87–114.
17.
LeviMLintonA (2003) Fair trade: A cup at a time?Politics and Society31(3): 407–432.
18.
MontgomeryMRGragnolatiMBurkeKA, et al. (2000) Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography37(2): 155–174.
19.
ParienteW (2000) The impact of fair trade on a coffee cooperative in Costa Rica: A producers behaviour approach. DEA d’Economie du Développement, Université Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne.
20.
PradhanM (2009) Welfare analysis with a proxy consumption measure: Evidence from a repeated experiment in Indonesia. Fiscal Studies30(3–4): 391–417.
21.
PrasadMKimeldorfHMeyerR, et al. (2004) Consumers of the world unite: A market-based response to sweat- shops. Labor Studies Journal29(3): 57–79.
22.
RaynoldsLT (2000) Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values17(3): 297–309.
23.
RaynoldsLT (2009) Mainstreaming fair trade coffee: From partnership to traceability. World Development37(6): 1083–1093.
24.
RonchiL (2002) The impact of Fair Trade on producers and their organizations: A case study with Coocaf’e in Costa Rica. Policy Research Unit. Sussex: University of Sussex.
25.
RosenbaumPRDonaldBR (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika70(1): 41–55.
26.
RubenRSchendelL van (2008) The impact of Fair Trade in banana plantations in Ghana: Income, ownership and livelihoods of banana workers. The impact of Fair Trade. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp.137–153.
27.
RubenRFortRZúñiga-AriasG (2009) Measuring the impact of fair trade on development. Development in Practice19(6): 777–788.
28.
ScherrerCGrevenTAscolyN (2001) Global rules for trade: Codes of conduct, social labeling, workers’ rights clauses. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Munster, Germany.
29.
ScherrerC (2015) The economic rationale for international labor rights. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Department für Asia and the Pacific.
30.
ShreckA (2005) Resistance, redistribution, and power in the Fair Trade banana initiative. Agriculture and Human Values22(1): 17–29.
31.
Utting-ChamorroK (2005) Does fair trade make a difference? The case of small coffee producers in Nicaragua. Development in Practice15(3–4): 584–599.
32.
Valiente-RiedlE (2012) Is Fairtrade Fair?Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. USA: MIT Press.
34.
YanchusDVanssayX De (2003) The myth of fair prices: A graphical analysis. The Journal of Economic Education34(3): 235–240.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
