For most of his working life, Kurt Lewin was known as a pioneering child psychologist. In 1939, Lewin appears suddenly to move his focus from children to adults and from laboratory experiments to changing behavior in the real world. This paper examines when and how, as a supposedly laboratory-based child psychologist, he developed the motivation, skills, knowledge and tools necessary to become the “intellectual father” of social and organizational change. It investigates Lewin's formative years, his education - especially his doctoral studies at the University of Berlin, and his military service in WW1. The paper concludes that rather than seeing Lewin as a pioneering child psychologist, we need to see him as a pioneering and campaigning psychologist, who had been studying human behavior (adult and child) and how to change it since beginning his doctoral studies in 1911, and applying this knowledge to organizations for almost as long.
AchN. (1905). Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Vandenhoeck & Rubprecht.
2.
AlberhaskyE. (2010). The plight of German Jewry: A relationship between emancipation & anti-Semitism. Kean University.
3.
AllportG. W. (1948). Foreword. In LewinG. W. (Ed.), Resolving social conflict (pp. vii–xiv). Harper & Row.
4.
AshM. G. (1998). Gestalt psychology in German culture 1890-1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BennettC. A.MarcellusF. S.ReynoldsJ. F. (1974). Counteracting psychological fatigue effects by stimulus change. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 18(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193127401800223
6.
BergmanW. (2018). A History of Antisemitism in Germany since the 18th Century – Brewminate: A Bold Blend of News and Ideas. Brewminate.
7.
BiestaG. (2002). Bildung and modernity: The future of Bildung in a world of difference. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019874106870
BrownJ. F. (1929). The methods of Kurt Lewin in the psychology of action and affection. Psychological Review, 36(3), 200–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076029
10.
BuckinghamH. W.FingerS. (1997). David Hartley's psychobiological associationism and the legacy of Aristotle. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647049709525683
BurnesB. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306297004
13.
BurnesB. (2020). The origins of Lewin’s three-step model of change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319892685
CrimB. E. (2011). Our most serious enemy: The specter of Judeo-Bolshevism in the German Military Community, 1914–1923. Central European History, 44, 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938911000665
16.
CrouthamelJ.GeheranM.GradyT.KӧhneJ. B. (Eds.). (2019). Beyond inclusion and exclusion: Jewish experiences of the First World War in Central Europe. Berghahn.
17.
CummingsT. G.WorleyC. G. (2015). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Cengage.
18.
DanzigerK. (2000). Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history. Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences, 36(40), 329–347.
19.
DeutschM. (1968). Field theory in social psychology. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 412–487). Addison-Wesley.
20.
EderA. B.DignathD. (2021). Associations do not energize behavior: On the forgotten legacy of Kurt Lewin. Psychological Research, 86, 2341–2351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01631-1
21.
ElonA. (2002). The pity of it all. Metropolitan Book.
22.
EndrejatP. C.BurnesB. (2022). Draw it, check it, change it: Reviving Lewin's topology to facilitate organizational change theory and practice. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 60(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863221122875
GoldM. (Ed.). (1999a). The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader.American Psychological Association.
28.
GoldM. (1999b). The making of a complete social scientist: A brief intellectual biography. In GoldM. (Ed.), The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader (pp. 7–21). American Psychological Association.
29.
GradyT. (2009). “They died for Germany’: Jewish soldiers, the German Army and conservative debates about the Nazi Past in the 1960s. European History Quarterly, 39(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265691408097365
30.
GradyT. (2011). The German-Jewish soldiers of the First World War in history and memory. Liverpool University Press.
JernS. (2005). A renewed reading of Kurt Lewin’s “Kriegslandschaft” (War Landscape): Personal experience, phenomenology and concept construction. The IXth European Congress of Psychology, Granada, Spain, 3–8 July.
33.
JohnM.EckardtG.HiebschH. (1989). Kurt Lewin’s early intentions (dedicated to his 100th birthday). European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420190208
34.
KadarE. E.ShawR. E. (2000). Toward an ecological field theory of perceptual control of locomotion. Ecological Psychology, 12, 141–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1202_02
35.
KampeN. (1985). Jews and Antisemites at universities in Imperial Germany (I): Jewish students: Social history and social conflict. The Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 30(1), 357–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/30.1.357
36.
KaplanM. A. (2002). Redefining Judaism in Imperial Germany: Practices, mentalities, and community. Jewish Social Studies: History, Culture, and Society, 9(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2979/JSS.2002.9.1.1
37.
KaplanM. A. (Ed.). (2005). Jewish daily life in Germany, 1618-1945. OUP.
38.
KatzJ. (1984). German culture and the Jews. Commentary Magazine, 77(2), 54–59.
39.
KeeganJ. (2014). The First World War. Bodley Head.
KonradM. (2015). The European war enthusiasm 1914. In LakitschM.Reitmair-JuárezS.SeidelK. (Eds.), Bellicose entanglements 1914 (pp. 15–42). Lit Verlag.
42.
LewinG. W. (1948a). Preface. In LewinG. W. (Ed.), Resolving social conflict (pp. xv–xviii). Harper & Row.
43.
LewinG. W. (Ed.). (1948b). Resolving social conflicts. Row.
44.
LewinK. (1914). Die Verwechslung von Wissenschaftssubjekt und psychischem Bewußtsein in ihrer Bedeutung für die Psychologie. Erstveröffentlichung in K.LW. Bd. 1. Wissenschaftstheorie I., 1982 (S. 111–125). Bern: Huber, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
45.
LewinK. (1917a). Die psychische Tätigkeit bei der Hemmung von Willensvorgängen und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 77, 212–247.
46.
LewinK. (1917b/2009). Kriegslandschaft. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie, 12(5), 440–447. Translated in Lewin, K., & Blower, J. (Translator). (2009). The Landscape of War. Art in Translation, 1(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.2752/175613109X462672
47.
LewinK. (1919). Die Rationalisierung des landwirtschaftlichen Betriebes mit den Mitteln der angewandten Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie, 15, 400–404. Reprinted in Gestalt Theory, 2009, 31(3/4), 263–268.
48.
LewinK. (1920/1999). Die Sozialisierung des Taylorsystems. Praktischer Sozialismus, 4(3), 3–36. Translated in Gold, M. (Ed.). The Complete Social Scientist: A Kurt Lewin Reader (pp. 297–320). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49.
LewinK. (1922a). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. I. Psychologische Forschung, 1(1), 191–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410391
50.
LewinK. (1922b). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. II. Psychologische Forschung, 2(1), 65–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412947
51.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. McGraw-Hill.
52.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. McGraw-Hill.
LewinK. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/218177
55.
LewinK. (1940). Formalization and progress in psychology. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), (1952) Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin (pp. 1–39). Social Science Paperbacks.
56.
LewinK. (1942). Field theory and learning. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), (1952) Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin (pp. 60–86). Social Science Paperbacks.
57.
LewinK. (1944). Constructs in field theory. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), (1952) Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin (pp. 30–42). Social Science Paperbacks.
58.
LewinK. (1949). Cassirer’s philosophy of science and the social sciences. In GoldM. (Ed.), (1999). The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader (pp. 23–36). American Psychological Association.
MeyerM. A. (1991). Jews as Jews versus Jews as Germans: Two historical perspectives: Introduction to year book XXXVI. The Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 36(1), xv–xxii. https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/36.1.xv
72.
MurrayD. J. (2012). Gestalt psychology. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of psychological theories (pp. 473–489). Springer.
73.
PerlinaA. (2015). Shaping the field: Kurt Lewin and experimental psychology in the interwar period [Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor philosophiae Dr. phil.]. Philosophischen Fakultät I der Humboltt-Universität zu Berlin.
74.
RemarqueE. M. (1929). All quiet on the Western front. Little Brown.
75.
RingerF. K. (1991). Academics in Germany: German and Jew some preliminary remarks. The Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 36(1), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/36.1.207
76.
RoeckeleinJ. (2006). Elsevier’s dictionary of psychological theories. Elsevier.
77.
ScheinE. H. (1988). Organizational psychology (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
78.
SedleyD. (2006). Parmenides and Melissus. In LongA. A. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy (pp. 113–133). CUP.
79.
TaylorA. J. P. (1979). How wars begin. Club Associates.
80.
TeoT. (2000). Ach, Narziss (1871-1946). In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 24–25). American Psychological Association/OUP.
van ElterenM. (1993). From emancipating to domesticating the workers: Lewinian social psychology and the study of the work process till 1947. In StamH. J.MosL. P.WarrenW.KaplanB. (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology selected Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Theoretical Psychology (pp. 335–358). Springer New York.
83.
Virtual Shtetl. (2022). Mogilno – History. sztetl.org.pl
