The purpose of this study was to determine if time-limited cross-functional teams socially constructed a perception of efficacy and cohesiveness through inquiry into best practices and peak experiences relative to teams focused on organizational problems and gap analysis. In a short-duration, alternative treatment, quantitative, quasi-experiment, six cross-functional teams, each with 6 participants, completed an ambiguous human-relationship-oriented task. Three teams employed appreciative inquiry (AI), and three teams employed creative problem solving (CPS). The findings supported the efficacy of AI. Aggregated results of individuals in teams employing AI reported higher levels of midtask group identification and posttask group potency than teams employing CPS. In this study, inquiry had an immediate effect on team member affective responses.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
3.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
5.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
6.
Barge, J. K., & Oliver, C. (2003). Working with appreciation in managerial practice. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 124-142.
7.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research: Methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253-285). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
9.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trotschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
10.
Barrett, F. J., & Cooperrider, D. L. (1988). Using generative metaphor to intervene in a system divided by turfism and competition: Building a common vision. Academy of Management Proceedings, 253-257.
11.
Brittain, J. (2001). Do we really mean it? In S. A. Hammond & C. Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (Rev. ed., pp. 218-229). Plano, TX: Thin Book Publishing.
12.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875-893.
13.
Bushe, G. R. (1995). Advances in appreciative inquiry as an organizational development intervention. Organization Development Journal, 13(3), 14-22.
14.
Bushe, G. R. (1998). Appreciative inquiry with teams. Organization Development Journal, 16(3), 41-50.
15.
Bushe, G. R. (2002). Meaning making with teams: Appreciative inquiry with preidentity and postidentity groups. In R. Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field (pp. 39-63). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
16.
Bushe, G. R., & Coetzer, G. H. (1995). Appreciative inquiry as a team-development intervention: A controlled experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31, 13-30.
17.
Cady, S. H., & Caster, M. A. (2000). A diet for action research: An integrated problem & appreciative focused approach to organizational development. Organizational Development Journal, 18(4), 79-93.
18.
Cameron, K. S. (2003). Organizational virtuousness and performance. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 48-65). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
19.
Cooperrider, D. L. (1999). Positive image, positive action: The affirmative basis of organizing. In S. Srivastva & D. L. Cooperrider (Eds.), Appreciative management and leadership (Rev. ed., pp. 91-125). Euclid, OH: Lakeshore Communications.
20.
Cooperrider, D. L. (2002). Forward: The coming epidemic of positive change. In R. Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field (pp. viii-xi). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
21.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Sekerka, L. E. (2003). Toward a theory of positive organizational change. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 225-240). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
22.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 1, pp. 129-169). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
23.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2001). A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. In D. L. Cooperrider, P. F. Sorensen Jr., T. F. Yaeger, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organizational development (pp. 5-29). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.
24.
Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. (2003). Appreciative inquiry handbook: The first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change. Bedford Heights, OH: Lakeshore Communications.
25.
Cunningham, G. B., & Chelladurai, P. (2004). Affective reactions to cross-functional teams: The impact of size, relative performance, and common in-group identity. Group Dynamics, 8(2), 83-97.
26.
Dooley, R. S., Fryxell, G. E., & Judge, W. Q. (2000). Belaboring the not-so-obvious: Consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. Journal of Management, 26, 1237-1257.
27.
Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Framing for learning: Lessons in successful technology. California Management Review, 45(2), 34-54.
28.
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273.
29.
Fox, J. M., & Fox, R. L. (2000). Exploring the nature of creativity. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
30.
Fry, R., & Barrett, F. (2002). Conclusion: Rethinking what gives life to positive change. In R. Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field (pp. 263-278). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
31.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K. M., & McGlynn, E. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics, 4(1), 98-114.
32.
George, M., & McLean, A. (2002). Putting the client before the horse: Working with appreciative inquiry in a small business. In R. Fry, F. Barrett, J. Seiling, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field (pp. 27-38). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
33.
Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barrett, F. J. (2004). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 39-60). London: Sage.
34.
Gergen, K. J., McNamee, S., & Barrett, F. J. (2001). Toward transformative dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 679-707.
35.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
36.
Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
37.
Gilbert, C., & Bower, J. L. (2002). Disruptive change: When trying harder is part of the problem. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 95-101.
38.
Glynn, M. A., & Barr, P. S. (2003). Team decision making in organizations. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. G. Smith (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative learning (pp. 211-228). New York: John Wiley.
39.
Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., Elliott, E. K., & Mathis, A. (2003). Promoting creativity in temporary problem-solving groups: The effects of positive mood and autonomy in problem definition on idea-generating performance. Group Dynamics, 7, 200-213.
40.
Gully, S., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
41.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Psychology, 32, 87-106.
42.
Head, R. L. (2000). Appreciative inquiry as a team-development intervention for newly formed heterogeneous groups. OD Practitioner, 32(1), 59-66.
43.
Head, T. C., Sorensen, P. F., Jr., Preston, J. C., & Yaeger, T. F. (2001). Is appreciative inquiry OD’s philosopher’s stone. In D. L. Cooperrider, P. F. Sorensen Jr., T. F. Yaeger, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organizational development (pp. 363-378). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.
44.
Hecht, T. D., Allen, N. J., Klammer, J. D., & Kelly, E. C. (2002). Group beliefs, ability, and performance: The potency of group potency. Group Dynamics, 6, 143-152.
45.
Henry, K. B., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group development: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558-581.
46.
Holland, S., Gaston, K., & Gomes, J. (2000). Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 231-259.
47.
Isaksen, S. G. (2000). Managing clients and resource groups. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Facilitative leadership: Making a difference with creative problem solving (pp. 103-118). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
48.
Isaksen, S. G., & De Schryver, L. (2000). Making a difference with CPS: A summary of the evidence. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Facilitative leadership: Making a difference with creative problem solving (pp. 187-248). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
49.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
50.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
51.
Jackson, P. Z., & McKergow, M. (2002). The solutions focus: The simple way to positive change. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
52.
Jones, D. A. (1998). A field experiment in Appreciative Inquiry. Organizational Development Journal, 16(4), 69-78.
53.
Kelm, J. (2001). Introducing the AI philosophy. In S. A. Hammond & C. Royal (Eds.), Lessons from the field: Applying appreciative inquiry (Rev. ed., pp. 160-174). Plano, TX: Thin Book Publishing.
54.
Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual-level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personal Psychology, 54, 645-667.
55.
Klein, S. (1995). Teams under stress. IIE Solutions, 27(5), 34-38.
56.
Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285-294.
57.
Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
58.
Li, J. T., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794-813.
59.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
60.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1999). Increasing the salience of one’s best selves can undermine inspiration of outstanding role models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 214-228.
61.
Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740-765.
62.
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communication perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779-793.
63.
Ludema, J. D. (2001). From deficit discourse to vocabularies of hope: The power of appreciation. In D. L. Cooperrider, P. F. Sorensen Jr., T. F. Yaeger, & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organizational development (pp. 443-465). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.
64.
Ludema, J. D., Cooperrider, D. L., & Barrett, F. J. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: The power of the unconditional positive question. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 189-199). London: Sage.
65.
Ludema, J. D., Whitney, D., Mohr, B. J., & Griffin, T. J. (2003). The appreciative inquiry summit. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
66.
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 19-72.
67.
Mayo, J. A. (2001). Using analogies to teach conceptual applications of development theories. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14, 187-213.
68.
McCluskey, K. W. (2000). Setting the stage for creative problem solving. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Facilitative leadership: Making a difference with creative problem solving (pp. 77-102). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
69.
Meda, A. K. (2003). Tendercare, Inc.: A case study using appreciative inquiry. Organization Development Journal, 21(4), 81-86.
70.
Meyer, J. P. (2003). Four territories of experience: A development action inquiry approach to outdoor-adventure experiential learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 352-363.
71.
Neumann, R. (2000). The causal influence of attributions on emotions: A procedural priming approach. Psychological Science, 11, 179-182.
72.
Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine: A meta-analysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32, 313-341.
73.
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures for creative thinking (Rev. ed.). New York: Scribner.
74.
Pearce, C. L., Gallagher, C. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2002). Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 115-119.
75.
Pescosolido, A. T. (2003). Group efficacy and group effectiveness: The effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research, 34, 20-42.
76.
Peterson, E., Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., & Burr, R. (2000). Collective efficacy and aspects of shared mental models as predictors of performance over time in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 296-316.
77.
Polzer, J., Milton, L. P., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324.
78.
Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do “great minds” think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 107-120.
79.
Sarin, S., & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34, 707-739.
80.
Schlenker, B. R., Pontari, B. A., & Christopher, A. N. (2001). Excuses and character: Personal and social implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 15-32.
81.
Sethi, R. (2000). New product quality and product development teams. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 1-14.
82.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257-276). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
83.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
84.
Swann, W. B., Jr., Milton, L. P., & Polzer, J. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 79, 238-250.
85.
Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2003). Leader and staff role-efficacy as antecedents of collective-efficacy and team performance. Human Performance, 16, 131-156.
86.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
87.
Thomas, M. S. C., & Mareschale, D. (2001). Metaphor as categorization: A connectionist implementation. Metaphor & Symbol, 16(1/2), 5-27.
88.
Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Understanding the history of CPS. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Facilitative leadership: Making a difference with creative problem solving (pp. 35-54). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
89.
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2000). Creative problem solving: An introduction (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
90.
Trochim, W. M. (2001). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
91.
Van der Haar, D., & Hosking, D. M. (2004). Evaluating appreciative inquiry: A relational constructionist perspective. Human Relations, 57, 1017-1036.
92.
van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. H. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
93.
Watkins, J. M., & Mohr, B. J. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: Change at the speed of imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
94.
Webber, S. S. (2002). Leadership and trust: Facilitating cross-functional team success. Journal of Management Development, 21, 201-214.
95.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
96.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
97.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1-14.
98.
Whiteoak, J. W., Chalip, L., & Hort, L. K. (2004). Assessing group efficacy: Comparing three methods of measurement. Small Group Research, 35, 158-173.
99.
Whitney, D., Cooperrider, D. L., Trosten-Bloom, A., & Kaplin, B. S. (2002). Encyclopedia of positive questions—Volume One: Using appreciative inquiry to bring out the best in your organization. Euclid, OH: Lakeshore Communications.
100.
Whitney, D., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2003). The power of appreciative inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
101.
Zaccaro, S. J., Gualtieri, J., & Minionis, D. (1995). Team cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology, 7(2), 77-93.
