A commitment to logico-scientific forms of knowing still dominates organization theory. Recently, narrative knowing and sensemaking have emerged as alternatives, but these approaches still identify the past as the locus for knowledge. Athird alternative, linked to concepts such as tacit knowledge, suggests that knowing can happen directly within the present but largely lacks the theoretical grounding that would make its practical implementation possible. To remedy this lack, this article introduces the future as a temporal locus for knowing. It distinguishes the told stories of narrative theory from the lived stories that shape human experience and invites a focus on the dynamic of the lived story rather than its content. A knowing open to the emerging, unknown future can be an invaluable resource for shaping organizational change, responding to a rapidly changing environment, integrating personal with organizational concerns, and exploring the ends that organizations serve.
Abram, D.
(1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Random House.
2.
Arendt, H.
(1959). The human condition. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
3.
Arendt, H.
(1965). On revolution. New York: McMillan Compass.
4.
Argyris, C.
(1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Argyris, C.
, & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Argyris, C.
, & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Bergson, H.
(1944). Creative evolution(A. Mitchell, Trans.). New York: Modern Library. (Original work published 1911)
8.
Bernstein, R.
(1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
Bluedorn, A.
(2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Bohm, D.
(2003). Dialogue as a new creative order. In L. Nichol (Ed.), The essential David Bohm(pp. 289-300). New York: Routledge.
11.
Boje, D.
(1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126.
12.
Bruner, J.
(2002). Making stories: Law, literature, and life. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
13.
Chalmers, A. F.
(1976). What is this thing called science? An assessment of the nature and status of science and its methods. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
14.
Clark, A.
(1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge. MA: MITPress.
15.
Czarniawska, B.
(1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Dennett, D.
(1992). The self as a center of narrative gravity. In F. Kessel, P. Cole, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Self and consciousness: Multiple perspectives(pp. 103-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Depraz, N.
, Varela, F., & Vermesch, P. (2002). On becoming aware. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18.
Dreyfus, H.
(1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Gabriel, Y.
(2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Gadamer, H. G.
(1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury.
21.
Geertz, C.
(1973). Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Hatch, M. J.
(1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Heron, J.
, & Reason, P. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In P. Reason& H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice(pp. 179-188). London: Sage.
24.
Hume, D.
(1978). Atreatise concerninghuman understanding. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1740)
25.
James, W.
(1947). A pluralistic universe. New York: Longman's Green. (Original work published 1909)
26.
Lakoff, G.
,& Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Lewin, K.
(1958). Group decision and social change. In E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb, & E. Hartley (Eds.), Reading in social psychology(pp. 197-211). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28.
Lyotard, J. F.
(1983). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
Mac Intyre, A.
(1984). After virtue(2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
30.
Morgan, G.
(1997). Images of organizations(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Nagel, T.
(1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Park, P.
(2001). Knowledge and participatory research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice(pp. 81-90). London: Sage.
33.
Petranker, J.
(2003). Inhabiting conscious experience: Engaged objectivity in the first-person study of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(12), 1-23.
34.
Polanyi, M.
(1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Polkinghorne, D.
(1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
Purser, R. E.
, Bluedorn, A.,& Petranker, J. (in press). Time and causes of flowin organizational change. In R. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
Purser, R.
, & Petranker, J. (2005). Unfreezing the future: Exploring the dynamic of time in organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(2), 182-203.
38.
Reason, P.
, & Torbert, W. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformations, 6(1), 1-37.
39.
Ricoeur, P.
(1984). Time and narrative(Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Rorty, R.
(1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Schell, J.
(1985). Introduction. In A. Michnik (Ed.), Letters from prison and other essays(pp. xvii-xlii). Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Schön, D.
(1986). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Schutz, A.
(1972). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
44.
Searle, J. (1999). Limits of phenomenology. Retrieved August 24, 2004, from http://philosophy. berkeley.edu/searle/articles/rtf/limits_phenomenology.rtf
45.
Senge, P.
(1994). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
46.
Senge, P.
,& Scharmer, C. O. (2001). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice(pp. 238-249). London: Sage.
47.
Senge, P.
, Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J.,& Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.
48.
Tsoukas, H.
,& Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, 567-584.
49.
Tulku, T.
(1987). Love of knowledge. Berkeley, CA: Dharma Publishing.
50.
Tulku, T.
(1990). Knowledge of time and space. Berkeley, CA: Dharma Publishing.
51.
Tulku, T.
(1994). Dynamics of time and space: Transcending limits on knowledge. Berkeley, CA: Dharma Publishing.
52.
Turetzky, P.
(1998). Time. New York: Routledge.
53.
Varela, F.
, Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
Vermersch, P.
(1999). Introspection as practice. In F. Varela & J. Shear (Eds.), The view from within: Firstperson approaches to the study of consciousness(pp. 17-42). Exeter, England: Imprint Academic.
55.
Watkins, J. M.
, & Mohr, B. (2001). Appreciative inquiry: Change at the speed of imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
Webber, A.
(1999). Learning for a change (interview with Peter Senge). Fast Company, 24, 178-178.
57.
Weick, K.
(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Weick, K.
(2001). Sensemaking as an organizational dimension of global change. In Making sense of the organization(pp. 458-471). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
59.
Weick, K.
,& Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 351-386.
60.
Wheatley, M.
(1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
61.
Wheatley, M., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996). The irresistible future of organizing. Retrieved August 15, 2004, from http://www.margaretwheatley.com/articles/irresistiblefuture.html
62.
Wolfram, S.
(2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
