As the countries of the Global South embark on industrialization, those of the Global North are shifting out their manufacturing units, seeking cheap labour and raw materials while aiming to reduce carbon emissions and natural resource depletion. However, production and processing entail significant water consumption, leading to extensive virtual water trade (VWT). Studies reveal the negative impacts of exporting virtual water (VW) on national sustainability. With India exporting 26,000 million litres of VW between 2006 and 2016, it could be headed for a water scarcity within 300 years. This article examines VW trade using case studies from the Eastern Himalayas, focusing on its impact on local communities. The depletion of freshwater resources has been widely felt across the region, resulting in significant social and economic changes, with the situation further complicated by VWT. This article examines how the VWT market contributes to the disruption of water accessibility for indigenous communities and how their interests can be safeguarded in this context.
Furthermore, the article discusses India’s dilemma as it strives towards its ambitious goal of becoming a $5 trillion economy. It raises important questions about how India can navigate the path of sustainable development while balancing economic growth with the urgent need to limit global temperature rise to below 2°C. The analysis suggests that without careful management, the pursuit of economic development could exacerbate the challenges faced by indigenous communities and further entrench inequities in global water distribution.
AgrawalA. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press.
2.
AllanA. (1993). Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible. In Priorities for water resources allocation and management (pp. 13–26). Overseas Development Administration.
3.
AzócarG., BilliM., CalvoR., HuneeusN., LagosM., & SapiainsR. (2021). Climate change perception, vulnerability, and readiness: Inter-country variability and emerging patterns in Latin America. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00639-0
4.
BaluM. (2020, September23). Mercantilism in the 21st century: An introspection. Asia Power Watch.
5.
BazrafshanO., EtedaliH. R., & MoshiziZ. G. N. (2022). Water footprint of fruits in arid and semi-arid regions. In Environmental footprints of crops (pp. 1–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0534-6_1
6.
BeckerG. S. (1995). Human capital and poverty alleviation[Human resources development and operations policy working paper no. 52]. The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/121791468764735830/pdf/multi0page.pdf
7.
BhattacharyaS. (2022, July19). How to solve the problem of Darjeeling’s water crisis. Outlook.
8.
BistaR. (2021, November29). Exploited for generations, tea garden workers struggle for land rights in Darjeeling hills, Terai, and Dooars. https://www.firstpost.com/politics/exploited-for-generations-tea-garden-workers-struggle-for-land-rights-in-darjeeling-hills-terai-and-dooars-10173161.html
9.
BlaikieP., & BrookfieldH. (1987). Land degradation and society. Routledge.
10.
BrindhaK. (2017). International virtual water flows from agricultural and livestock products of India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 922–930.
11.
ChapagainA., & HoekstraA. (2004). Water footprints of nations—Volume 1: Main report-value of water research report series no. 16. UNESCO IHE Delft.
12.
ChettriA. (2019, April15). Flourishing water markets in Darjeeling. India Water Portal.
13.
CWC. (2011). Water resources at glance.
14.
Department of Social Affairs, UN. (1963). World economic survey.
15.
DittrichM. (2019). The physical dimension of international trade, 1962–2005. InBleischwitzR. W.(Ed.), Sustainable growth and resource productivity. Economic and global policy issues. Greenleaf Publishing.
16.
DolganovaI., MikoschN., BergerM., NúñezM., Müller-FrankA., & FinkbeinerM. (2019). The water footprint of European agricultural imports: Hotspots in the context of water scarcity. Resources, 8, 1–11.
17.
DuarteR., PinillaV., & SerranoA. (2016). Understanding agricultural virtual water flows in the world from an economic perspective: A long-term study. Ecological Indicators, 61, 980–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.056
18.
DurantW. (1930). The case for India. Simon and Schuster.
19.
EhrlichP. (1968). The population bomb. Ballantine Books.
20.
European Commission. (2011). Water scarcity and droughts in the European Union.
FalkenmarkM. (2013). Growing water scarcity in agriculture: Future challenge to global water security. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371, 1–14.
FederD. R. (1997). The political ecology of deforestation in Malawi. East African Geographical Review, 19(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00707961.1997.9756245
25.
GhosalS. (2018, July18). Fresh export demand brews cheer for Darjeeling tea after year of political roil. The Economic Times.
26.
GoswamiP., & NishadS. (2015). Virtual water trade and time scales for loss of water sustainability: A comparative regional analysis. Scientific Report, 5, 1–11.
27.
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
28.
HoekstraA. (2003). Virtual water trade proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. Value of water research report series no. 12 (p. 244). IHE Delft.
29.
HoekstraA., & HungP. (2002). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of water research report series no. 11 (p. 120). IHE Delft.
30.
HoekstraA. Y., & HungP. Q. (2005). Globalisation of water resources: International virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.06.004
31.
HoekstraA. Y., & MekonnenM. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. A Conference Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 3232–3237). PNAS.
32.
HorlemannL., & NeubertS. (2007). Virtual water trade: A realistic concept for resolving the water crisis?Studies/German Development Institute (DIE): Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik and Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ).
33.
IbarraC., JiménezG., O’RyanR., BlancoG., CorderoL., InsunzaX., MoragaP., RojasM., & SapiainsR. (2022). Scientists and climate governance: A view from the South. Environmental Science & Policy, 137, 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.09.012
34.
ISO. (2014). ISO 14046:2014 environmental management—Water footprint—Principles, requirements and guidelines.
35.
KhawasV. (2011). Status of tea garden labourers in eastern Himalaya: A case of Darjeeling tea industry. InDesaiM. & MitraS.(Eds.), Cloud stone and the mind (pp. 98–119). KPB.
36.
KhawasV., & SharmaK. (2022). Depleting water resources and agriculture in Darjeeling hills: A critical nexus. Journal of Indian Water Works Association, 280–288.
37.
KohnH. (1929). History of nationalism in east. Routledge.
38.
KonerK., & SamantaG. (2021). ‘Where does water go’? A critical analysis of nature of water crisis in Darjeeling city, India. Applied Water Sciences, 11, 184.
39.
KumarV., & JainS. (2007). Status of virtual water trade from India. Current Science, 93, 1093–1099.
40.
LeeS.-H., MohtarR. H., & YooS.-H. (2019). Assessment of food trade impacts on water, food, and land security in the MENA region. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(1), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-557-2019
41.
LiuJ., YangH., GoslingS. N., KummuM., FlörkeM., PfisterS., HanasakiN., WadaY., ZhangX., ZhengC., AlcamoJ., & OkiT. (2017). Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future. Earth’s Future, 5(6), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000518
42.
MaddisonA. (2007). The contours of world economy 1-2030. Oxford University Press.
43.
ManiK. A. S. (2021, July15). India’s water is being exported as agri exports: Is there a solution?Down To Earth. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/agriculture/india-s-water-is-being-exported-as-agri-exports-is-there-a-solution-77966
44.
MinchM. (2011). Political ecology. InChatterjeeD.(Ed.), Encyclopedia of global justice (pp. 863–865). Springer.
45.
MoriK. (2003). Virtual water trade in global governance. InHoekstraA. Y.(Ed.), Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade (pp. 119–124). Value of water research report series no. 12. IHE Delft.
46.
MubakoS., LahiriS., & LantC. (2013). Input–output analysis of virtual water transfers: Case study of California and Illinois. Ecological Economics, 93, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.005
47.
MubakoS. T., RuddellB. L., & MayerA. S. (2013). Relationship between water withdrawals and freshwater ecosystem water scarcity quantified at multiple scales for a Great Lakes watershed. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 139, 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000374
48.
NishadS., & KumarN. (2022). Virtual water trade and its implications on water sustainability. Water Supply, 22, 1704–1722.
49.
Niti Aayog. (2019). Assessment of water foot prints of India’s long term energy scenarios.
50.
NovoaV., Ahumada-RudolphR., RojasO., SáezK., de la BarreraF., & ArumíJ. L. (2019). Understanding agricultural water footprint variability to improve water management in Chile. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.127
51.
NustadK. G., & SwansonH. (2021). Political ecology and the Foucault effect: A need to diversify disciplinary approaches to ecological management?EPE: Nature and Space, 5, 924–946.
52.
Ohio University. (2021, February18). How often should you bathe?
53.
ONU. (2018). Sustainable Development Goal 6 synthesis report 2018 on water and sanitation. United Nations.
54.
PadmaT. (2015). Virtual water trade: India loses, China gains water through food trade. The Third Pole.
55.
PandeyK. (2002, April29). No toilet paper? US Health experts say washing may be better than wiping. Times Now.
56.
PTI. (2023, January26). India a ‘bright spot’ in world economy right now: Top UN economist.
57.
RakshitA. (2016, March11). Darjeeling tea to cost more abroad. Business Standard.
58.
RenaultD. (2003). La valeur de l’eau virtuelle dans la gestion de l’alimentation [Virtual water value in food supply management]. La Houille Blanche, 89(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2003013
59.
Reuters. (2023, January6). Indian economy in a relative ‘bright spot’, must leverage exports.
60.
RobbinsP. (2019). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Wiley.
61.
RobertsJ. (2020). Political ecology. InSteinS. L. F.(Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology (pp. 1–17). Cambridge University.
62.
RowlattJ. (2016, July15). The dark history behind India and the UK’s favourite drink. BBC News.
63.
SahidA. (1998). Colonialism and industrialization: Empirical results. Northeastern University Press.
64.
SapiainsR., IbarraC., JiménezG., O’RyanR., BlancoG., & MoragaP. (2020). Exploring the contours of climate governance: An interdisciplinary systematic literature review from a Southern perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1912
65.
SarkarS., & DebR. (2023, April28). The deplorable work conditions behind Harrods 7000 Ambootia Snow Mist Darjeeling tea. The Real News Network.
66.
Science Direct. (2022). Science direct database 2000–2022.
67.
ShankarS. R., & JayasriA. S. (2015). The need for virtual water credits and trading system. Water Supply, 15(5), 933–939. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.047
68.
SharmaK. & KhawasV. (2025, July3). Himalayan springs are drying.It’s a threat to India’s ecological stability and national security. The Indian Express. Retrieved fromhttps://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/himalayan-springs-drying-ecological-(stability-national-security-10103457/
69.
SreeVidhyaK., & ElangoL. (2019). Temporal variation in export and import of virtual water by India through popular crop and livestock products. Ground Water for Sustainable Development, 8, 1–19.
70.
Statista. (2023). Countries with the largest population. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262879/countries-with-the-largest-population/
71.
SunJ. X., YinY. L., SunS. K., WangY. B., YuX., & YanK. (2021). Review on research status of virtual water: The perspective of accounting methods, impact assessment, and limitations. Agricultural Water Management, 243, 106407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106407
72.
Tea Board of India. (1956). Tea statistics 1956. https://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/Tea_Statistics_1956_pdf7024.pdf
73.
Tea Board of India. (2004). Tea statistics 2003–04. https://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/Tea_Statistics_2003_04_pdf321.pdf
74.
Tea Board of India. (2011). 57th annual report 2010–11. https://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/57th_Annual_Report_2010_2011_pdf9026.pdf
75.
Tea Board of India. (2012). 58th annual report 2011–12. https://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/58_English_AR_11_12_pdf7778_pdf2178.pdf
76.
Tea Board of India. (2017). Annual report combined 2016–17. https://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/Annual_Report_Combined_2016_17_Total_Book_27_11_2017_Final_Curve_pdf4622.pdf
77.
Tea Board of India. (2021). Chronology of Indian tea: Area, production, yield, export, and auction data (1938–2021).
78.
Tea Board of India. (2022a). Annual report 2020–21. https://www.teaboard.gov.in/pdf/Annual_Report_2020_2021_pdf1655.pdf
79.
Tea Board of India. (2022b). Tea board of India report 1951–2022.
80.
The Washington Post. (1992, February10). World Bank official’s irony backfires.
81.
TukkerA., BulavskayaT., GiljumS., KoningA., LutterS., SimasM., StadlerK., & WoodR. (2016). Environmental and resource footprints in a global context: Europe’s structural deficit in resource endowments. Global Environmental Change, 40, 171–181.
82.
VaidyaR. (2011). The determinants of trade credit: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. Modern Economy, 2(5), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2011.25079
83.
VaidyanathanG. (2023). How India is battling deadly rain storms as climate change bites. Nature, 210–213.
84.
VanhamD., & BidoglioG. (2013). A review on the indicator water footprint for the EU28. Ecological Indicators, 26, 61–75.
85.
WeingastB. (2018). War, trade, and mercantilism: Reconciling Adam Smith’s three theories of the British empire. Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies, 1–29.
86.
WeiszH., KrausmannF., AmannC., EisenmengerN., ErbK., HubacekK. F., & KowalskiM. (2006). The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption. Ecological Economics, 58, 676–698.
87.
WescoatJ. L., FletcherS., & NovellinoM. (2016). National rural drinking water monitoring: Progress and challenges with India’s IMIS database. Water Policy, 18, 1015–1032.
88.
World Bank. (2023, February14). How is India addressing its water needs?https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/india/brief/world-water-day-2022-how-india-is-addressing-its-water-needs
89.
World Economics Research. (2022). Country size: India. https://www.worldeconomics.com/Country-Size/India.aspx
90.
WWF. (2010). Global footprint network. ZSL (Zoological Society of London).
91.
ZhongR., ChenA., ZhaoD., MaoG., ZhaoX., HuangH., & LiuJ. (2023). Impact of international trade on water scarcity: An assessment by improving the Falkenmark indicator. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135740.
