As non-governmental organizations (NGOs) assume incrementally important roles in global environmental governance, literature regarding their functions also multiplies. Studies are available about their features, structural advantages or impacts. However, very few have sufficiently explained what makes them tick in the international system as non-state actors. In this article, we argue that NGOs’ important position in global governance lies in its authority. We build our analysis on sociological institutionalism and the principal–agent models, arguing that NGOs are independent and autonomous with both inherent authority and granted authority by sovereign states or inter-governmental organizations (IGOs). It is through this authority that NGOs could function independently and autonomously in global governance instead of being the affiliated or appendant actors of parties. To shed some new light on understanding NGOs in the international system from a theoretical perspective, we employ cases from environmental governance domain as evidence for illustration.
BarnettM.FinnemoreM. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics (p. 29). Cornell University Press.
2.
BulkeleyH. (2010). Climate policy and governance: An editorial essay. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 311–313.
3.
ChuanJ. (2006). The influence and role of NGOs in contemporary international relations. Journal of University of International Relations, 24(5), 35–40.
4.
ConcaK. (1995). Greening the United Nations: Environmental organizations and the UN system. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 441–458.
5.
Corporate Sustainability Training. (n.d.). Global Environment Institute official website. http://www.geichina.org/program/oite/corporate-sustainability/
6.
DingliW.LiangZ. (2018). The status and role of NGOs in International Environmental Protection. Social Scientists, 33(2), 110–113.
7.
EstyD. (1998). Non-governmental organizations at the world trade organization: Cooperation, competition, or exclusion. Journal of International Economic Law, 1(1), 123–148.
8.
FocseneanuV. (1993). Walls, sovereignty, and nature: Ecological security in an interdependent world. Teaching strategy. Update on Law-Related Education, 17, 81–84.
9.
FomerandJ. (1996). UN conferences: Media events or genuine diplomacy?Global Governance, 2(3), 361–376.
10.
GemmillB.Bamidele-IzuA. (2002). The role of NGOs and civil society in global environmental governance. Global environmental governance: Options and opportunities (pp. 77–100), Yale Center of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
11.
GepingR. (2005). International organizations in the process of globalization (p. 85). Peking University Press.
12.
GieseL. J. (2017). The role of NGOs in international climate governance: A case study of Indian NGOs (p. 36). All College Thesis Program, Minnesota.
13.
Global Environment Institute (2017). Global Environment Institute official website. http://www.geichina.org/about-us/introduction-to-gei/
14.
Global Environment Institute. (2017). China’s policy banks boost overseas investment. http://www.geichina.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Sustainable_FDI_CN_GEI2017.pdf
15.
HawkinsD. G., LakeD. A., NielsonD. L.TierneyM. J. (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Delegation under anarchy: States, international organizations, and principal-agent theory (Vol. 1, pp. 3–38). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491368
16.
HongsongL. (2006). Autonomy of international organizations: Two theoretical perspectives and comparison. Diplomatic Review, 23(3), 104–110.
IPCC (2019). IPCC official website. http//www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization.shtm
19.
JianhongZ.YiweiZ. (2013). A preliminary study of principal-agent theory in the study of international organizations. Diplomatic Review, 30(4), 143–154.
20.
KaiyunC. (2011). Study on the relationship between the Chinese government and non-governmental organizations in the international institutional environment (pp. 19–23). Nanjing Normal University Press.
21.
KeohaneR., NyeJ.HonghuaM. (trans). (2002). The club model of multilateral cooperation and the World Trade Organization: Problems of democratic legitimacy. World Economics and Politics, 16(12), 58–63.
22.
MillerD., BogdanowV.ZhenglaiD. (trans.) (2002). Blackwell encyclopedia of political science (p. 203). China University of Political Science and Law Press.
23.
MorgansH.XinX. (Trans.). (2005). Political politics—Struggle for power and peace (pp. 407–410). Peking University Press.
24.
O’BrienR., GoetzA. M., ScholteJ. A.WilliamsM. (2000). Contesting global governance, multilateral economic institutions and global social movements (p. 110). Cambridge University Press.
25.
PisarskaK. (2016). The domestic dimension of public diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
PollackM. (2002). Learning from the Americanists (again): Theory and method in the study of delegation. West European Politics, 25(1), 200–219.
27.
QingcaiL.NongshouZ. (2006). The role of NGOs in global governance. International Studies, 48(1), 48–52.
28.
SarooshiD. (1997). The development of collective security: The delegation of chapter VII powers by the United Nations Security Council (p. 25). University College London.
29.
UN. (1992). Agenda 21: The United Nations programme of action for sustainable development. The UN Conference on Environment and Development, New York.
30.
WaltzK.QiangX. (trans.). (2008). International political theory (pp. 135–170). Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
31.
WeiH. (2018). Global climate public governance dual predicament, development trend and China’s response. Environmental Protection, 46(5), 75–79.
32.
XinleiL. (2018). The networking of non-state actors in Global Climate Governance: Models,drivers and impact. International Forum, 20(2),17–26.
33.
XiaoliL. (2013). Research on the role of Chinese NGOs in the field of non-governmental diplomacy. China Governance Review, 2(1), 155–158.
34.
YanB. (2007). International organizations in climate governance: Authority and source—Take the UN environment agency as an example. European Research, 25(1), 87–100.
35.
ZhenyeL. (2005). Non-governmental organizations in international politics: An interactive relationship analysis (p. 112). Tianjin People’s publishing House.
