In South Asia, the movement of people and goods across borders is strictly controlled by states. However, there are some exceptions to these factors. India–Nepal border, for instance, is peaceful and porous with minimal restrictions on the movement of goods and people. Albeit there are times when border issues between these two friendly neighbours have taken a critical turn. One such recent border-related problem between India and Nepal was witnessed during the Madheshi movement. In 2015, an agitating section of the Madheshi community blocked the India–Nepal border. Due to the sociocultural proximity of Madheshi community with India, the blockade of the Indo-Nepal border has had repercussions on the bilateral ties. Conceptually, this article argues how border shapes relations between neighbours in South Asia. Empirically the recent blockade of the India–Nepal border is presented as an example to substantiate the primary argument of this article. There is also an attempt in this article to study the recent changes in the India–Nepal relations from the perspective of border studies.
ChaturvedyR. R. (2016). Structure and resilience in India–Nepal relations. Singapore: Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore.
9.
DabhadeM.PantH. V. (2004). Coping with challenges to sovereignty: Sino-Indian rivalry and Nepal’s foreign policy. Contemporary South Asia, 13(2), 157–169.
Government of India. (2016). Ministry of home affairs annual report 2015–2016. New Delhi: Government of India.
17.
HachhethuK. (2007, August22–24). Madheshi nationalism and restructuring the Nepali state. Paper presented at an international seminar on constitutionalism and diversity in Nepal. Retrieved from http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/midea/pdf/Hachhethu.pdf
HoutumH. V. (2011). The mask of the border. In Wastl-WalterD. (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 49–62). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Company.
JonesR. (2018). Spaces of refusal rethinking sovereign power and resistance at the border. In JonesR.FerdoushM. A. (Eds.), Borders and mobility in South Asia and beyond (pp. 31–58). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
KarkiR.PaudelL. (2015). Challenges to the revision of the Nepal–India 1950 peace and friendship treaty. Strategic Analysis, 39(4), 402–416.
26.
KonradV. (2015). Toward a theory of borders in motion. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(1), 1–17.
27.
LaineJ. P. (2015). A historical view on the study of borders. In SevastianovS. V.LaineJ. P.KireevA. A. (Eds.), Introduction to border studies (pp. 14–32). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Federal University.
NayakH. R. (2016). Landlocked and transit developing countries: Nepal’s transit route negotiations with India. Strategic Analysis, 40(2), 101–121.
33.
NewmanD. (2011). Contemporary research agendas in border studies: An overview. In Wastl-WalterD. (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 33–48). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Company.
PrasadJ. (2016). India–Nepal relations: On the threshold. In BhatnagarA.PassiR. (Eds.) Neighbourhood first (pp. 96–105). New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.
40.
SahuA. K. (2015). Future of India–Nepal relations: Is China a factor?Strategic Analysis, 39(2), 197–204.
41.
SchendelW. V.MaakerE. D. (2014). Asian borderlands: Introducing their permeability, strategic uses and meanings. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(1), 3–9.
TripathiD. (2015). Interrogating linkages between borders, regions, border studies. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(2), 189–201.
52.
TripathiD. (2016). Creating borders in young minds: A case study Indian and Pakistani school textbooks. Regions and Cohesion, 6(1), 52–71.
53.
TripathiD. (2019). Regional integration: The European model and the South Asian experience. In SachdevaG. (Ed.), Challenges in Europe: Indian perspectives (pp. 341–357). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
ValletE.DavidC. P. (2012). Introduction: The (re)building of the wall in international relations. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27(2), 111–119.
55.
Wastl-WalterD.KoflerA. C. (2000). European integration and border related institutions: A practical guide. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 15(1), 85–106.
